We’re Told the Switch to Workday Isn’t Going So Great at RSM

Posted on by Adrienne Gonzalez
Tom and Jerry computer meme

According to a tip we received yesterday from a very frustrated auditor at RSM, the firm’s recent switch to Workday isn’t working.

The tip:

Effective 8/1/23, RSM’s scheduling, time management, billing and CRM system all merged to one system called Workday. Before the implementation all those modules were handled by a different software. We were happy with the old system. However, this Workday implementation is not going well at all. Now it takes more than double to enter our time, Billing people can’t send out invoice as they used to (used to take them 10 minutes to invoice now 3 hrs), no one knows how and where we can retrieve WIP reports.

Here’s how it was supposed to go according to a 2021 press release from Workday:

With Workday, RSM will:

  • Leverage one system for its global finance, people, and project data to efficiently monitor business performance, engage with its growing workforce, and change at the speed demanded by clients
  • Create an end-to-end project billing process in the cloud, improving efficiency and gaining greater visibility into financial performance
  • Eliminate silos to streamline time tracking for greater operational visibility and performance across the company’s 13,000 employees

“We have ambitious growth and revenue goals and recognized we needed to accelerate our digital transformation initiative to support those goals. With Workday, we can break down data silos, streamline processes, and eliminate inefficiencies in order to better manage our performance as we scale. As important, we expect to elevate our customer service as we continue to focus on being the RSM First Choice Advisor among middle market companies and showing our customers the power of being understood,” said Brian Vickers, controller, RSM US LLP.

How it’s actually going according to our tipster:

We can’t even generate a report to compare budget hours and actual hours. From managers to partners, no one knows the answer as to when and how. Some people call “Workday” “Worst-day.”

Good one. They added:

Many processes now work together (in theory) such as time entry, billing & invoice system, our payroll system etc. As of today, not all functionality of Workday is available to us. RSM has not informed us when the functionality would be available.

Thoughts and prayers to everyone at RSM during this difficult time.

Ron Swanson throwing computer in the trash

Related Posts

During the 1099 Repeal Debate, a Democrat More or Less Called a Bunch of Republicans Liars, Then Took it Back, and Then May Have Called Them Liars Again

The repeal of the 1099 reporting provision of the healthcare reform bill was finally passed by the House today but not before things got a little awkward when Represenative Earl Blumenauer (D-OR) “said Republican claims that the law is a government takeover of healthcare had been deemed ‘the 2010 political lie of the year.’ “

Now, on its surface, this seems like a little bit of tangential grandstanding by the man-child gentleman from Oregon but his colleague Dan Lungren (R-CA) didn’t appreciate the remark and was not about to let this slide:

Blumenauer seemed to gesture toward Lungren, who had just finished speaking, and said the Republican member called the healthcare law a government takeover.

Lungren did not directly say the law is a government takeover, but did criticize the laws in other ways.

After Blumenauer’s “lie of the year” comment, Lungren quickly interrupted to raise a point of order and ask whether Blumenauer should be allowed to say, or imply, that Lungren is a liar.

Blumenauer – not to be outdone – countered this challenge with one of his own:

Asked if he was demanding Blumenauer’s words be “taken down” — a challenge to their propriety — Lungren said no, but did ask the acting Speaker to warn members about referring to colleagues in this way.

The exchange continued: Blumenauer said he was simply citing a Politifact finding that Republican claims of a government healthcare takeover are the political lie of the year. Lungren then immediately asked that Blumenauer’s words be taken down.

Blumenauer, knowing he was beat, then capitulated (he’s a Democrat, after all), “Several minutes later, Blumenauer asked unanimous consent to strike his words,” and then thought better of it, “[he] repeated the Politifact citation again in his explanatory comments.”

“I’m not calling anybody a liar,” Blumenauer said. “What I intended to say … is that as we have repeated talking points about a government takeover of healthcare, this has been judged by an independent undertaking as the political lie of the year.”

It could probably go either way but someone seems to be getting called a liar in there somewhere.

Lawmakers spar over ‘lie of the year’ in debate over healthcare provision [Floor Action/The Hill]

The AICPA’s Leadership Academy Doesn’t Sound So Awful After All

First, I never implied the AICPA Leadership Academy was awful in the first place, I just to make sure we’re clear on that. I only use “awful” because you lot seem like the sort of people who mostly care about money and fulfillment, with neither of those necessarily mutually exclusive. It’s totally fine, we can’t all be leaders.

But one day, you kids are going to inherit the empire (scary, I know). When all the Boomer partners have retired and you’re looking at filing 2025’s tax returns, will you be at the top of the food chain setting the tone or still lingering at the bottom picking up DUIs on Saturday nights? Just think a the following is an account of the AICPA’s recent Leadership Academy in North Carolina by Joshua Partlow. Joshua is a CPA under 40 and a partner at Johnson Lambert & Co. LLP. I share it with you guys only because it’s pretty interesting, which can’t usually be said for a lot of the pro-industry fluff we come across.

Last week, I had the pleasure of attending the AICPA’s Leadership Academy—as a member of its third class—in Durham, NC. I was among 33 participants under the age of 36. The Academy started off like many seminars do in this mobile age, with participants glued to our smartphones and somewhat disconnected from our surroundings. But that disconnection would be short-lived.

The mood transitioned quickly to one of collaboration and engagement as the instructors—Gretchen Pisano, president Sounding Board Ink, LLC, Tom Hood, CPA, executive director and CEO of the Maryland Association of CPAs and Jeannie Patton, AICPA vice president – students, academics & membership—began the Insight to Action process. We broke up into three groups to tackle three challenging real-life scenarios in business, non-profit and personal relationships. These tasks forced us to focus on the strengths of our characters, utilizing the i2A Strength Based Leadership program that we had been introduced to during our preconference workshops. The program coaches participants for leadership, teaching them self-awareness techniques, how to work from a source of natural strength and how to inspire their team to do the same.

My breakout group was tasked with the personal relationship scenario, helping a large, multi-generational family plan an annual vacation. What we learned was classic succession planning: the matriarch and patriarch of the fictional family had always taken the lead on making flight and destination arrangements and planning day-to-day activities. However, with a new dynamic involving grandchildren and in-laws, it was time for their adult children to step up and take the reins. It was a situation we could all relate to. The combination of strategic thought and the high quality of each and every participant’s contribution was amazing.

Strategic planning within the i2A model allowed us to interact, learn from one another and see, in a creative way, how our scenarios directly reflect what many of us are facing in our careers. We are all roughly the same age and coming into our time as leaders in our firms or organizations. Now, it’s not so much about building accounting experience and achievement (although that certainly plays a role). It’s more about finding within ourselves the courage and ability to mentor, guide and inspire. The experience opened my eyes to think differently—to think like a leader.

Why am I not surprised to see Tom Hood’s name show up?

Anyway, it’s too late to get on board for 2011 but if any of this sounds remotely interesting to you (hint: “leadership” = “getting people to do your evil bidding”), details on the 2012 Leadership Academy will be issued by the AICPA in January.

pug cuddled in blankets on a bed, sleeping woman

Tuesday Morning Accounting News Brief: A New Kind of Audit Quality Report; Merger Mania; Skilled Talent, Not Newbies | 5.28.24

Welcome back to the workweek. I trust everyone had a safe and restful Memorial Day […]

7 thoughts on “We’re Told the Switch to Workday Isn’t Going So Great at RSM”

  1. No surprise! Everyone is jumping on the band wagon without realizing that Workday is not the be all end all. It is definitely lacking when it comes to Higher Ed but no one listens. It’s all bells and whistles and little functionality.

  2. most of the times is due to lack of training.
    once you get used to a new system, with proper training as well, it won’t take more than a few mins like before.

  3. It is called change management and I can attest at public accounting firms they don’t like change, they like tradition. I can imagine any change of systems listed by RSM would get the same reaction from users. Not a Workday issue.

  5. The thing that’s killing us on time entry is that the search functionality can only be applied to the entire tree of all elements of a charge code at once. Under the old time entry platform you first selected the client, then selected a chargeable “folder” for that client (and auditors had one more level of specific audit task selection after that).

    Not only is the tree dramatically expanded in Workday (customer > project > phase > task instead of just client > folder), but any search will yield all matching configurations of those parameters – so searching something like “client name tax compliance” might drop 100s of results to dredge through because you get every single phase and task of the project. The tasks are stuff like “prepare” or “review” which might be useful to separately track in theory but result in septuple the number of search results. To make things worse, for reasons beyond comprehension the search actually ignores the “phase” field, which 90% of the time is going to be the most relevant field after the client (things like “Form 1120 preparation” or “Accounting method change”).

    What is frustrating is that it’s not like the platform doesn’t track the right data to be able to do things smoothly, it’s just a crappy UI and search design that was clearly built for SaaS providers where most employees would only be working on a small handful of projects at any given time and not PA where charging time to 6+ different clients or tasks per day is pretty routine. Very much a square peg/round hole issue.

  6. This story reminds me of when PwC went from Lotus Notes to Gmail in 2015-2016. All the change resistant accountants freaked out for months because the change interrupted their day-to-day. I bet if you asked 99% of PwC today, they wouldn’t want to go back to Lotus Notes

Comments are closed.