Apparently they were planning to do a little maintenance on the Tax Pro Account systems from October 13-15. No biggie. This is fine. It’s just like any other weekend. A holiday weekend no less!

but why?!? pic.twitter.com/IpyTDXaAdc

— Andrea Carr CPA (@andreacpa0) October 12, 2024

The notification no tax pro wants to see on the days leading up to 10/15:

Good news though! Thanks to a large number of exhausted tax pros taking time out of their busy emotional breakdowns to complain, the IRS decided not to torture them further with scheduled maintenance after all.

The #IRS Tax Pro Account maintenance this weekend has been postponed. The system will remain open. We appreciate tax pros and especially the long hours they’re putting in to serve taxpayers ahead of the 10/15 deadline. Thank you to #TaxTwitter pros for flagging this!

— IRSnews (@IRSnews) October 12, 2024

Happy 10/15, everyone.

Earlier:

The post The IRS Decided to Troll Tax Pros For 10/15 appeared first on Going Concern.

That IRS press release, for your reading pleasure:

IRS moves forward with Employee Retention Credit claims: Agency accelerates work on complex credit as more payments move into processing; vigilance, monitoring continues on potentially improper claims

The ERC program began as an effort to help businesses during the pandemic, but as time went on the program increasingly became the target of aggressive marketing – and potentially predatory in some cases – well after the pandemic ended. Some promoter groups called the credit by another name, such as a grant, business stimulus payment, government relief or other names besides ERC or the Employee Retention Tax Credit (ERTC).

To counter the flood of claims, the IRS announced last fall a moratorium on processing claims submitted after Sept. 14, 2023, to give the agency time to digitize information on the large study group of ERC claims, which are made on amended paper tax returns. The subsequent analysis of the results during this period helped the IRS evaluate next steps, providing the agency valuable information to improve the accuracy of ERC claims processing going forward.

The detailed review during the moratorium allowed the IRS to move into this new stage of the program with more payments and disallowances. In addition, the IRS will remain in close contact with the tax professional community to help navigate through the complex landscape.

While this might be good news for the few business owners who’ve been waiting a long time for their legitimate ERC claims to go through, apparently some senators weren’t so happy to hear this.

U.S. Senators Mitt Romney (R-UT), Thom Tillis (R-NC), and Joe Manchin (I-WV) said on September 19 they’ve introduced the Employee Retention Tax Credit Repeal Act, bipartisan legislation that would disallow the processing of Employee Retention Tax Credit (ERTC) claims filed after January 31, 2024 and increase penalties on fraud.

In the IRS’ own words, ERC has been rife with fraud and abuse, hence the moratorium they placed on processing of new ERC claims last year. Employee Retention Credits made the yearly Dirty Dozen list of tax scams two years in a row.

Said the senators in their news release:

The ERTC has been highly susceptible to fraudulent schemes—costing taxpayers nearly 200% more than anticipated and adding an estimated $230 billion to the national debt through Fiscal Year 2023. By eliminating the ERTC, the senators’ bill would save taxpayers an estimated $79 billion over 10 years.

“In a rare moment of widespread agreement in Washington, almost all members of Congress agree that we should eliminate the ERTC—which has been pervaded by fraud and cost nearly 200% more than originally projected,” said Senator Romney. “Stealing from the government is stealing from hardworking taxpayers. Instead of repurposing ERTC funds for future spending programs, we should eliminate this plagued credit now to lower our national debt.”

“Repealing the ERTC is a critical step towards addressing America’s debt crisis,” said Senator Tillis. “It’s past time to eliminate this fraud-ridden pandemic-era policy so we can concentrate on getting our fiscal house in order.”

Estimates suggest the ERC credit has added $230 billion to the deficit through FY2023 and could eventually cost up to $550 billion.

“Congress established the ERTC during the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic to encourage businesses to retain employees during such unprecedented circumstances. As President Biden formally ended the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency in May 2023, it’s time for the IRS to move on, too. I’m proud to join the bipartisan ERTC Repeal Act, which would end the ERTC for claims submitted after January 31, 2024—cutting down on the staggering and unexpected costs of this program—and would enhance anti-fraud measures for claims still being processed,” said Senator Manchin.

Over the summer, the IRS The IRS spent months digitizing information and analyzing data for more than one million ERC backlogged claims, the total of which was more than $86 billion. Through this analysis, the agency determined 10-20% of claims were low-risk, 60-70% of claims had unacceptable risk, and 10-20% had high risk. Meaning only about 10-20% of these million ERC claims were most likely legitimate and met the requirements to claim the credit.

As of August, he IRS has sent out 28,000 disallowance letters to businesses whose claims showed a high risk of being incorrect, disallowances that will prevent up to $5 billion in improper payments according to IRS estimates. Thousands of audits are underway, and 460 criminal cases have been initiated. The IRS has moved 50,000 low-risk ERC claims into the pipeline for payment processing in coming weeks.

Text of the Employee Retention Tax Credit Repeal Act can be found here [PDF].

Romney, Tillis, Manchin Introduce Bipartisan Legislation to Repeal COVID-Era Tax Credit Riddled with Fraud [Senator Mitt Romney]

The post Senators Want to Nuke the ‘Fraud-Ridden’ Employee Retention Credit For Good appeared first on Going Concern.

Why 80%? Because many of the employers caught up in this flood of dubious ERC claims did so at the urging of what the IRS calls “aggressive promoters” — the cottage industry that popped up around the many pandemic-era credits and quickly overtook those people calling you about your car’s extended warranty as the most obnoxious of unsolicited calls. Even we got emails from these people promising huge payoffs if our business applied for ERC credits, credits that these non-CPA hawkers of tax credits swore were basically free money. Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans were actually free money, ERC not so much and using the PPP free money glitch disqualified employers from double dipping on ERC. Anyway, employers that fell for these promises would pay a fee to the “aggressive promoter” who urged them to file, a payment due prior to seeing any money from the IRS. Thus the IRS is being unusually kind and not requiring voluntary disclosers to pay back the full amount they received in erroneous ERC. You can bet they’ll be extracting that pound of flesh from whatever “aggressive promoters” they can nail to the wall.

Many employers that filed ERC claims — not only the ones suckered by smooth-talking telemarketers but legitimate, qualified employers — are still waiting on payments.

The voluntary disclosure program was strictly for employers who’d seen payouts as a way for them to pay it back. The voluntary withdrawal program was for those still waiting on ERC claims to be paid out, including employers with checks from the IRS they hadn’t yet cashed, and came with no penalty at all. If a voluntary withdrawal was accepted, the IRS would pretend it never happened (“Claims that are withdrawn will be treated as if they were never filed”) and everyone would go on with their lives.

ERC had very specific requirements, requirements that many filers didn’t actually meet. As its name suggests, Employee Retention Credits were meant to encourage struggling employers to keep people on staff in the early days of lockdowns. In order to qualify an employer had to pay qualified wages to some or all employees after March 12, 2020, and before January 1, 2022.

Generally, businesses and tax-exempt organizations that qualify are those that:

• Were suspended by a government order due to the COVID-19 pandemic during 2020 or the first three calendar quarters of 2021, or
• Experienced the required decline in gross receipts during 2020 or the first three calendar quarters of 2021, or
• Qualified as a recovery startup business for the third or fourth quarters of 2021

By the time the IRS issued a moratorium on processing ERC claims in September 2023, they’d discovered thousands of claims that failed to meet the basic criteria for the ERC program such as A) being a business and B) having employees on the payroll. But that still left plenty of borderline cases that weren’t immediately clear as legit or not. This past June, the agency announced it had digitized and analyzed about one million ERC claims representing more than $86 billion and was making progress on the difficult task of sorting ERC claims into fraud, maybe bullshit, and probably OK categories. They identified some common red flags that were a recurring theme in many ERC claims destined to be rejected or worse:

• Essential businesses during the pandemic that could fully operate and didn’t have a decline in gross receipts – The most basic of requirements to qualify for ERC. Essential businesses didn’t qualify because their operations weren’t suspended or disrupted by government orders. “Modifications that didn’t affect an employer’s ability to operate, like requiring employees to wash hands or wear masks, doesn’t mean the business operations were suspended,” said the IRS.
• Business unable to support how a government order fully or partially suspended business operations – If everyone could stay home and continue working, the IRS doesn’t consider the business disrupted.
• Business reporting family members’ wages as qualified wages. – As it describes. Wages paid to related individuals and members of the same household aren’t qualified wages for the ERC.

And as mentioned above, another flag for a possibly bad ERC claim is businesses using wages already used for PPP loan forgiveness. They can’t claim ERC on wages they reported as payroll costs to get PPP loan forgiveness.

Now imagine used car salesmen trying to explain all these rules to some rube in Nebraska who was just trying to keep his business afloat in 2020.

Leading up to the end of the voluntary disclosure program on March 22, the IRS pushed out many reminders that the window to admit your business took ERC money it wasn’t entitled to was quickly closing. Hurry up and disclose or it’s gonna hurt! This is your last chance or we’re gonna bend you over! Don’t make us do it!

Well, they’ve opened the window again. Announced August 15, Voluntary Disclosure Program v.2 is live and open until November 22. Here’s what they said:

The Employee Retention Credit (ERC) Voluntary Disclosure Program (VDP) will run through November 22 and allow businesses a chance to correct improper payments at a 15% discount and avoid future audits, penalties and interest. During the first disclosure program that ended in March, there were more than 2,600 applications from ERC recipients that disclosed $1.09 billion worth of credits.

To underscore the importance of participating in the Voluntary Disclosure Program, the IRS also announced it plans to mail up to 30,000 new letters to reverse or recapture potentially more than $1 billion in improper ERC claims. Thousands more mailings on additional questionable payments will be made in the fall.

“The limited reopening of the Voluntary Disclosure Program provides an opportunity for those with improper claims to come in ahead of IRS compliance work and get a discount on repayments,” said IRS Commissioner Danny Werfel. “This is especially important given increasing IRS compliance actions involving bad claims, many of them are the result of aggressive marketing tactics to lure unsuspecting businesses into claiming the complex credit. This provides a final window of opportunity for those misled businesses to make adjustments and avoid future compliance action by the IRS.”

2,600 applications is a lot but compare that to the 1.4 million open claims the IRS had in June. After the September moratorium, the IRS was seeing more than 17,000 ERC claims come in every week.

“The push by promoters flooded the IRS with questionable ERC claims, which clogged our systems and slowed work,” said Werfel. “We recognize well-meaning businesses are caught up in this, and we are taking important steps to help them. This includes reopening the Voluntary Disclosure Program as well as getting more payments out to qualifying businesses.”

As of May, IRS Criminal Investigation has initiated 450 criminal cases, with potentially fraudulent ERC claims worth nearly $7 billion. 36 investigations have resulted in federal charges so far, with 16 investigations resulting in convictions and seven sentencings with an average sentence of 25 months.

IRS reopens Voluntary Disclosure Program to help businesses with problematic Employee Retention Credit claims; sending up to 30,000 letters to address more than $1 billion in errant claims [IRS]

The post The IRS Is Trying to Get ERC Employers to Tell on Themselves Again appeared first on Going Concern.

He writes:

Last month, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) announced an extension of a pause on processing Employee Retention Credit (ERC) claims submitted after Sep. 14, 2023. The agency closely examined ERC claims in backlog and determined that 10-20% of claims were low-risk, 60-70% of claims had unacceptable risk, and 10-20% had high risk. I applaud the IRS’ prudent use of the increased funding from the Inflation Reduction Act to sift through invalid claims, identify low-risk claims, and perform a timely analysis of millions of ERC claims.

The IRS has said that it would “begin judiciously processing more” low-risk claims, with the first payments going out later in the summer. However, the already identified low-risk ERC claims, submitted by struggling small businesses, should be approved and paid now. Immediately approving and paying low-risk ERC applicants would greatly benefit the roughly 150,000-300,000 applicants who are still operating in a challenging economic environment.

In a June 20 news release, the IRS announced plans to deny tens of thousands in “improper high-risk” ERC claims following a detailed review of unprocessed claims. The IRS spent months digitizing information and analyzing data for more than one million ERC claims, the total of which was more than $86 billion.

Of the timeline for issuing payments for those claims deemed low risk the IRS said:

The IRS anticipates some of the first payments in [the low risk] group will go out later this summer. But the IRS emphasized these will go out at a dramatically slower pace than payments that went out during the pandemic period given the need for increased scrutiny.

As the additional IRS processing work begins at a measured pace, other claims will begin being paid later this summer following a final review. This additional review is needed because the submissions may have calculation errors made during the complex filings. For those claims with calculation errors, the amount claimed will be adjusted before payment.

The IRS also noted that generally the oldest claims will be worked first, and no claims submitted during the moratorium period will be processed at this time.

Just to make sure people who are waiting on ERC claims to be paid out are very, very clear on the timeline, the IRS then said:

The IRS cautioned taxpayers who filed ERC claims that the process will take time, and the agency warned that processing speeds will not return to levels that occurred last summer. Taxpayers with claims do not need to take any action at this point, and they should await further notification from the IRS. The agency emphasized those with ERC claims should not call IRS toll-free lines because additional information is generally not available on these claims as processing work continues.

“These complex claims take time, and the IRS remains deeply concerned about how many taxpayers have been misled and deluded by promoters into thinking they’re eligible for a big payday. The reality is many aren’t,” Werfel said. “People may think they are on safe ground, but many are simply not eligible under the law. The IRS continues to urge those with pending claims to use this period to review the guideline checklist on IRS.gov, talk to a legitimate tax professional rather than a promoter and use the special IRS withdrawal program when there’s an issue.”

In wrapping up his piece, Rettig said “It is true that the fog of war and the predatory schemes of some bad actors misled some small businesses into thinking they were eligible for ERC when they were not.”

“However, fighting fraud should not come at the expense of legitimate small businesses with claims pending at the IRS.”

The IRS is right to scrutinize pandemic-era employee retention credit claims—but legitimate filers can’t afford more delays [Ex-IRS Commissioner Chuck Rettig in Fortune]

The post Chuck Rettig Thinks His Former Employer Should Hurry Up on Paying Out ERC Claims appeared first on Going Concern.

Hate to say we told you so but…scratch that, we do enjoy saying that. WE TOLD YOU SO. On August 9, 2022 we published “Where TF Is the IRS Supposed to Find 87,000 Agents?” and you don’t even need to read it to get the gist. Here are some highlights anyway:

So the IRS is struggling with recruitment and retention just like every other business and firm with a need for accountants in the last two years. In 2019, 74,454 people worked for the IRS. And they think they’re going to double that number in this market? With all due respect, HOW??

…

On top of its aging workforce, the IRS has struggled to stay competitive salary-wise. Mind you they are competing with Walmart in some cases.

…

Tell your nearest conservative uncle not to worry, there’s no way the IRS is going to find this many agents.

In “Qualified Applicants Aren’t Jumping To Work For the IRS,” VP of Research for the National Taxpayers Union Foundation (NTUF) Demian Brady breaks the news:

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is struggling to hire a workforce commensurate with the super-sized budget expansion that it recently received. According to a report from the Treasury Department, qualified candidates just aren’t jumping forward to work for the tax cops. It’s yet another example of how the IRS’s budget boost was hastily implemented, poorly designed, and dangerous for taxpayers.

To be fair, the Inflation Reduction Act-sponsored hiring plan is on a 10-year timeline. As Forbes columnist and friend of GC Peter J. Reilly commented on our earlier article, “It is a ramp up going out to 2031. So some of them are not in high school yet.” And the IRS isn’t looking only for experienced agent types who have better options post-public accounting, rather the agency planned to fill the majority of new positions with people to answer phones (cue PTSD groaning from #TaxTwitter) and process individual returns. New hires in the IRS Criminal Investigation category were supposed to make up less than 1% of the total tens of thousands of employees, adding about 300 more IRS-CI special agents to the agency’s existing 2,100. For more on that see: Anyone Looking Forward to a Highly Militarized IRS SWAT Team is Going to Be Sorely Disappointed.

Demian continues:

Government Executive reports that even though the IRS has been given “expedited hiring authority” to provide more flexibility in filling positions, it is actually taking longer to fill an IRS position than the average for the federal government. But the situation is even worse than that.

The Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) recently found that the IRS has encountered significant hurdles in attracting qualified candidates for roles it planned to fill. TIGTA notes that even the first wave of specialists the IRS hoped would spearhead its crusade against the wealthy have yet to be hired and onboarded, as applications have been “far below the IRS targeted goal.”

From that TIGTA report [PDF] dated March 11, 2024:

The two completed milestones are:

• Unified, enterprise-wide recruiting strategy developed. (Initiative 5.2)
  The IRS has completed this milestone. An enterprise-wide recruiting strategy for revenue agents was developed and shared with the Human Capital Office and business units. Additionally, the IRS developed an enterprise-wide FY 2024 Strategic Recruitment Plan and is developing a Recruitment Guide outlining methodology, roles and responsibilities, and recruiting capabilities and
  channels for key recruiting stakeholders.
• Recruitment and hiring plan developed. (Initiative 5.5)
  The IRS has completed this milestone. The IRS presented the finalized version of the FY 2024 Specialized Data Employee Recruitment and Hiring Plan to the Chief Data and Analytics Officer and Objective 5 Lead as well as key business unit stakeholders.

As of two years ago, the IRS was losing about 10,000 employees per year. They’d hoped to hire 10,000 employees by the end of fiscal 2023 and another 10,000 this year. But as we can see, that’s moving slow even by government standards.

The post As Prophesied, the IRS Is Struggling to Hire All Those New Agents appeared first on Going Concern.

He was arrested last July at which time U.S. Attorney Philip R. Sellinger said, “While our country was fighting the spread of the virus and its profound economic impact, Haynes allegedly scammed the system in a massive scheme to line his own pockets. As described in the complaint, Haynes abused his position as a tax preparer to steal millions of dollars by submitting over 1,000 false applications for funds set aside to help legitimately struggling businesses. My office and our partners will continue to find and prosecute fraudsters who exploited the pandemic for personal gain.”

The employee retention tax credit was just one of several relief measures authorized by Congress in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and the effects lockdowns had on businesses. As the name implies, ERC was intended to ease tax burdens for employers who were able to keep people on staff rather than lay them off. Another credit packaged in the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act allowed for a paid sick and family leave credit employers could apply against employment taxes for wages paid to employees on sick leave because of COVID-19.

Said the Department of Justice in the news release:

As charged in the indictment, from November 2020 to May 2023, Haynes repeatedly exploited these programs that were intended to help small businesses impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Acting as a tax preparer, Haynes allegedly filed more than 1,600 false employment tax returns with the IRS claiming COVID-related tax credits on behalf of himself and his clients.

Haynes allegedly falsely told his clients that the government was giving out COVID-relief money for businesses and that they were eligible for it simply because they had a business. Haynes allegedly submitted forms to the IRS on behalf of his client’s businesses, often without consulting his clients, that grossly overstated the number of employees and the amount of wages paid to fraudulently claim these COVID-related tax credits. Haynes allegedly submitted similarly false forms for four of his own companies.

According to the indictment, based on these and other misrepresentations, Haynes fraudulently sought more than $150 million in tax refunds on behalf of his companies and numerous other businesses in his clients’ names.

Allegedly Haynes’ clients got at least $40 million in tax refunds from his filings, a portion of which he received as a fee and often in cash at his request. Aaaaaand…New Jersey Tax Preparer Charged in COVID-19 Employment Tax Credit Scheme

Haynes allegedly did not report on his or his businesses’ tax returns some of the income he received from clients as his share of the fraudulent obtained tax refunds. The IRS also allegedly directly mailed Haynes multiple tax refund checks totaling $1,428,592 based on false claims he submitted relating to his businesses.

If convicted, he could get a maximum penalty of 20 years in prison for each mail fraud charge, a maximum penalty of five years in prison for each tax evasion charge, three years in prison for aiding and assisting in the preparation of false return charge and two years in prison for the aggravated identity theft charge.

Related:

The post Tax Preparer Finds Out in the Worst Way Possible That ERC Wasn’t a Free Money Glitch appeared first on Going Concern.

The two cases mentioned in the IRS press release today involve millions of dollars of fraudulent Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) and Economic Injury Disaster Loan Program (EIDL) claims:

• Long Island man sentenced to 10 years in prison for sprawling COVID-19 loan fraud
• Toledo area man sentenced to 94 months in prison for COVID fraud

As for the ongoing investigations:

Four years after the enactment of a key pandemic-era law, the Internal Revenue Service released updated numbers showing Criminal Investigation (CI) has investigated 1,644 tax and money laundering cases related to COVID fraud potentially totaling $8.9 billion, with well over half that amount coming from cases opened in the last year.

These cases include a wide range of criminal activity, including fraudulently obtained loans, credits and payments meant for American workers, families and small businesses under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security (CARES) Act.

As of Feb. 29, 795 people have been indicted for their alleged COVID-related crimes and 373 individuals have been sentenced to an average of 34 months in federal prison. During the last four years, CI has obtained a 98.5% conviction rate in prosecuted COVID fraud cases.

As far as we’re aware there haven’t been any ERC cases prosecuted yet but you best believe they’re coming.

The post Surprise, There Was a Lot of COVID Relief Fraud appeared first on Going Concern.

While the consensus used to be that quitting during busy season makes you a tremendous piece of shit without exception, attitudes toward bailing at the worst possible time have changed over the years. It’s still frowned upon and considered rude but perhaps not the permanent reputation killer it once was. However, any would-be jumpers should know the colleagues they leave behind will continue to disparage them behind their back for years to come. YEARS. And you probably won’t be invited back.

Sometimes it’s worth it to stick it out. This applies strictly to high performers who care about these sorts of things and like to leave the door cracked open in case they want to return at some point. Like Marjorie Rollinson, the newest IRS hire.

Senate Finance Committee Chair Ron Wyden (D-OR) spoke very highly of her in this statement just before her confirmation as IRS chief legal counsel last Thursday:

First off, Ms. Rollinson has the right experience necessary to do this job at a high level. She has decades of tax and management experience, both in the private sector and in public service. In fact, after many years in private practice, she spent several years of the last decade in the IRS Office of Chief Counsel.

First she served as Technical Deputy Associate Chief Counsel and then as Associate Chief Counsel, both times on international tax issues. And trust me, you don’t earn those job titles without real expertise in tax law, down to the finest details that leave most of us scratching our heads. All this experience is a big reason why she got bipartisan support in the Finance Committee.

FIRST first she served a 26-year sentence at EY, exiting in 2013 as a principal. From there she went to the IRS, did five years, and returned to EY for a short stint of three years.

And now she’s back at the IRS.

“Marjorie Rollinson is an excellent pick for this job. She’s experienced, she’s highly qualified and she’s got the technical expertise. She’ll also be the first woman to serve in this role,” said Wyden in his remarks.

“The Treasury Department is pleased to see the Senate confirm Marjorie Rollinson to the key post of IRS Chief Counsel with bipartisan support,” said Treasury spokesperson Haris Talwar to Federal Times. “With decades of experience in the private and public sectors, including at the IRS, she will hit the ground running. As IRS Chief Counsel, Marjorie will play a critical role in ensuring the fair and effective implementation of our tax laws as well as in our efforts to modernize the IRS over the next several years.”

Be funny if PwC poaches her from the IRS eh?

The post The New Chief Legal Counsel at the IRS Really Sucks at Burning Bridges appeared first on Going Concern.

WaPo report:

A former government contractor who leaked a slew of confidential tax records filed by the wealthiest Americans, including those of President Donald Trump, was sentenced Monday to the maximum of five years in prison in what a federal judge called “the biggest heist in IRS history.”

U.S. District Judge Ana C. Reyes said Littlejohn deserved the maximum sentence she could impose, because he had targeted a sitting president and thousands of others. Prosecutors said Littlejohn had disclosed the tax returns of about 7,600 individuals and 600 entities.

After comparing Littlejohn to the rioters who stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, Reyes said judges had to send a message that “open season on our elected officials” would not be tolerated and that “an independent and steadfast judiciary stands ready to punish anyone who holds his personal political beliefs above the law.”

From 2018 to 2020, Littlejohn supplied New York Times and ProPublica with Trump tax documents that the media had been trying to track down for years and, while he was at it, released a bunch more. PP went on to publish “Never-Before-Seen Trump Tax Documents Show Major Inconsistencies” in October, 2019. See also: the “The Secret IRS Files, Inside the Tax Records of the .001%” category in which PP reports on “a vast cache of IRS information showing how billionaires like Jeff Bezos, Elon Musk and Warren Buffett pay little in income tax compared to their massive wealth.”

In court, Biden-appointed U.S. District Judge Ana C. Reyes did not mince words. It seems Charlie purposely went out and got an IRS contractor job with Booz Allen Hamilton for the purpose of getting his hands on these tax returns. “Mr. Littlejohn did not make a snap judgment; he made a series of calculated decisions over two to three years to willfully violate the law. Most stunning, Mr. Littlejohn has admitted that he sought to work as an IRS consultant with the hope and expectation of accessing and disclosing then-President Trump’s tax information,” she said. “This court cannot permit others to view this type of conduct as acceptable or justifiable or worth the trade-off, no matter what their purported political or ideological motivation may be.”

“I alone am responsible for this crime,” he said to the judge. He knew what he was doing and was prepared for the consequence. In this case, the consequence being a maximum sentence of five years, a stern talking-to from the judge, and forever being lumped in with this guy.

Further reading: Man Who Leaked Trump’s and Bezos’ Tax Returns Sentenced to Five Years in Prison [WSJ]

The post The Contractor Who Leaked Trump’s Taxes Will Be Going Away For Five Years appeared first on Going Concern.

Today we’re going to look at a less funny letter the AICPA sent to Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen (or “Janette L. Yellen” per the letter) and IRS Commissioner Daniel “Danny” Werfel “RE: The Impact on Taxpayers and Tax Practitioners of an Internal Revenue Service
Shutdown during the 2024 Tax Filing Season.” The full letter is below.

TLDR The AICPA is deeply concerned that a 2024 government shutdown would have catastrophic effects on the IRS, taxpayers, and taxpayers’ practitioners and outlines just a few of the issues basically guaranteed to happen should there be a shutdown. The letter notes that some of these are already problems due to the backlog and will only get worse if a shutdown does as the name describes and grinds most of the IRS to a halt.

As noted in the National Taxpayer Advocates September 29 blog, the IRS’s Contingency Plan takes
a narrow interpretation of the Office of Management and Budget guidance to encompass only the
government’s safety of human life and protection of property and not the safety and property of U.S.
citizens and taxpayers. This interpretation results in many important tax administration functions
stopping in the event of a shutdown. Specifically:

• Taxpayer phone calls should be answered, but with two-thirds of the IRS furloughed access
  to information to resolve taxpayer issues will be limited.
• All Taxpayer Assistance Centers will close, which will result in a loss of face to face service
  to thousands of taxpayers per day.
• Refunds will not be processed except in cases where e-filed, error free refunds can be automatically direct deposited; thus, no refunds to approximately one-third of taxpayers that depend on their refunds for daily living.
• The IRS will not respond to paper correspondence, as well as certain paper filings, which will
  create a paper backlog.
• Automated notices will continue, which include notices of intent to levy and automatic
  transfers to collections.

According to our members, though there have been recent improvements to IRS services, processes are still not functioning at pre-pandemic levels. Adding an IRS shutdown will create more problematic issues, burdens, and backlogs, similar to those created by the pandemic. Past experience has taught us that an IRS shutdown, especially between now and April 15, 2024, will have dire consequences to the IRS, taxpayers, and their practitioners. The longer the shutdown, the larger the backlog and other challenges become. When the IRS re-opens, the IRS will need to work through the backlog while at the same time processing incoming paper and electronic submissions and answering an increased number of taxpayer calls to resolve outstanding issues.

Never one to only complain and not offer solutions to go with the complaining, the AICPA offers a few recommendations to address these potential issues:

1. Update the Current Contingency Plan to Include the IRA Funding to Provide Full Assistance to Taxpayers and Tax Practitioners
2. Provide Automatic Extension of Notices and Collections Until 90 Days from the Shutdown Ending Date, Stop Assessing Penalties and Interest, and Cease Sending Automated Notices
3. Maintain All Online Systems and Accounts to Ensure They Operate Effectively
4. Retain More IRS Chief Counsel Attorneys for Guidance

You can see full recommendations here. See? The AICPA does have your back!

The post Government Shutdown Would Mean ‘Dire Consequences’ to Taxpayers and Practitioners, Says AICPA to Treasury Threateningly appeared first on Going Concern.

Employers that have filed an ERC but not yet received a refund can withdraw the claim and avoid repayment, interest, penalties, and being made fun of for falling for slick ERC charlatans flooding their inbox. Employers that submitted an ERC claim still being processed can withdraw their claim and avoid the possibility of getting a refund for which they’re ineligible, the IRS said in a news release.

The agency also said:

The IRS created the withdrawal option to help small business owners and others who were pressured or misled by ERC marketers or promoters into filing ineligible claims. Claims that are withdrawn will be treated as if they were never filed. The IRS will not impose penalties or interest.

Those who willfully filed a fraudulent claim, or those who assisted or conspired in such conduct, should be aware that withdrawing a fraudulent claim will not exempt them from potential criminal investigation and prosecution.

“The IRS is committed to helping small businesses and others caught up in this onslaught of Employee Retention Credit marketing,” said IRS Commissioner Danny Werfel. “The aggressive marketing of these schemes has harmed well-meaning businesses and organizations, and some are having second thoughts about their claims. We want to give these taxpayers a way out. The withdrawal option allows employers with pending claims to avoid future problems, and we encourage them to closely review the withdrawal option and the requirements. We continue to urge taxpayers to consult with a trusted tax professional rather than a marketing company about this complex tax credit.”

Employers can use the ERC claim withdrawal process if all of the following apply:

• They made the claim on an adjusted employment return (Forms 941-X, 943-X, 944-X, CT-1X).
• They filed the adjusted return only to claim the ERC, and they made no other adjustments.
• They want to withdraw the entire amount of their ERC claim.
• The IRS has not paid their claim, or the IRS has paid the claim, but they haven’t cashed or deposited the refund check.
• Taxpayers who are not eligible to use the withdrawal process can reduce or eliminate their ERC claim by filing an amended return.

How to withdraw an ERC claim

To take advantage of the claim withdrawal procedure, taxpayers should carefully follow the special instructions at IRS.gov/withdrawmyerc, summarized below.

• Taxpayers whose professional payroll company filed their ERC claim should consult with the payroll company. The payroll company may need to submit the withdrawal request for the taxpayer, depending on whether the taxpayer’s ERC claim was filed individually or batched with others.
• Taxpayers who filed their ERC claims themselves, haven’t received, cashed or deposited a refund check and have not been notified their claim is under audit should fax withdrawal requests to the IRS using computer or mobile device. The IRS has set up a special fax line to receive withdrawal requests. This enables the agency to stop processing before the refund is approved. Taxpayers who are unable to fax their withdrawal using a computer or mobile device can mail their request, but this will take longer for the IRS to receive.
• Employers who have been notified they are under audit can send the withdrawal request to the assigned examiner or respond to the audit notice if no examiner has been assigned.

Those who received a refund check, but haven’t cashed or deposited it, can still withdraw their claim. They should mail the voided check with their withdrawal request using the instructions at IRS.gov/withdrawmyerc.

The IRS will be issuing more guidance for employers later this fall.

For professionals reading this interested in the ERC withdrawal process you can sign up the upcoming November 2 IRS webinar “Employee Retention Credit: Latest information on the Moratorium and Options for Withdrawing or Correcting Previously Filed Claims.”

The post The IRS Is Graciously Letting Taxpayers Withdraw Some Bad ERC Claims appeared first on Going Concern.

The request, received by TIGTA on February 18, 2022 urged TIGTA to “open an inquiry into the revolving door between the country’s top accounting firms and the Federal Government and to inform Congress and the public about [TIGTA’s] findings.” The request noted that the review should include “the extent to which large accounting firms and their employees are taking advantage of the revolving door [i.e., employees moving] between their firms and Government service at the IRS.”

Said TIGTA:

We considered this request when developing the scope of our review.

The Congressional request provides information that shows that similar to the IRS, the large accounting firms also have Codes of Conduct and Ethical standards. Specifically, in their response to a Congressional inquiry, the firms noted that they review and adhere to post Government restrictions. Additionally, each of the firms have resources available to their employees, such as ethics officers and Hotlines, for individuals to contact if they have ethical questions and/or concerns.

The overall objective of this audit was to assess the IRS’s processes and procedures to identify and address potential conflicts of interest regarding tax administration matters involving large corporations. Here’s what they found:

Our analysis identified 496 employees (executives and non-executive employees from the Large Business and International Division, Office of Chief Counsel, and Independent Office of Appeals) who received income from a large accounting firm or a large corporation either prior to joining, during their time at, or after leaving the IRS. Of these 496 employees:

• 241 employees had income from a large accounting firm.
• 255 employees had income from a large corporation.

Our review found no direct correlation between the employees’ work assignments and the company or firm from which they came or left for in the private sector. However, our review identified four Office of Chief Counsel non-executive employees who charged time to a private letter ruling in which the taxpayer’s representative was the same large accounting firm that the employee recently worked for before joining the IRS or left the IRS to join. While not a direct correlation, this can raise impartiality concerns.

Deeper into the report some of the actual numbers are redacted.

Our analysis identified that 241 of the 496 employees received income from a large accounting firm either prior to joining the IRS, during their time at the IRS, or after leaving the IRS. Specifically, we identified:

• 184 current IRS employees, including [redacted] employees who held an executive position and the remaining [redacted] a non-executive position.
• 57 separated IRS employees, including [redacted] employees who were executives with the IRS and the remaining [redacted] who were non-executives. Of these 57 separated IRS employees, 20 had income from a large accounting firm prior to joining the IRS and subsequently separated from the IRS.

[redacted] and [redacted] of the executives previously mentioned received retirement income from a large accounting firm during their time at the IRS, and they disclosed this retirement income on their financial disclosures. [hella redacted] and [big black block] and [you know the deal]. Figure 1 provides a list of the current and former executive-level positions and examples of the types of non-executive positions within the IRS.

Figure 1 is also full of black blocks, though it does say 232 of the non-executives included in this analysis held positions such as Revenue Agents, General and Trial Attorneys, Tax Law Specialists, Economists, and Appeals Officers.

On the large corporation side, 255 of the 496 employees received income from a large corporation either prior to joining the IRS, during their time at the IRS, or after leaving the IRS. Specifically:

• 177 current IRS employees, including seven employees who held an executive position and the remaining 170 a non-executive position.
• 78 separated IRS employees, including 21 employees who were executives with the IRS and the remaining 57 who were non-executives. Of these 78 separated IRS employees, 13 had income from a large corporation prior to joining the IRS and subsequently separated from the IRS.

There were three employees included in the analysis with income from both a top accounting firm and large corporation.

Six of the executives previously mentioned received income during their employment with the IRS from partnerships, wages, and other compensation sources. All of these executives reported the sources of income on their annual financial disclosures.

Said TIGTA:

There is nothing inherently wrong with or prohibitions on individuals moving in and out of the private sector to public service, as the movement between sectors can contribute to the career development of personnel and improved organizational competencies.

However, this practice increases the risk for conflicts of interest. For example, the movement of employees in and out of the private sector to public service can increase the risk of conflicts of interest for incoming and outgoing employees and the possibility of undue influence by former or prospective employers that might lead to preferential treatment or create an unfair advantage for specific entities or individuals. Processes to address this risk should include restrictions to protect Governmental processes from abuse, but should not be so onerous that the Government can no longer attract the highly talented individuals it needs for positions in public service.

When TIGTA brought their observations to the IRS, management stated that to successfully conduct audits of large corporations, the IRS must rely on experienced agents with strong tax and accounting skills. Outside of the IRS, prospective employees with tax expertise generally
come from accounting firms, law firms, or in‐house tax departments of all sizes. As such, to recruit experienced tax professionals, the IRS must draw from these sources of outside tax expertise.

More IRS employees used the General Legal Services hotline — a phone or email system in place for them to seek ethics advice — regarding “Outside Employment” than any other topic from FY17 to FY21.

Cases in the GLS management system also include direct inquiries from management or former employees.

The GLS resolves cases either by oral discussion, e-mail to the employee, or in a more formal written response. However, the resolution or advice issued to the employee is not documented within the case management system of record. The GLS stated that the system does not contain a data field for it to track case resolutions or aggregate data based on the types of advice given.

TIGTA recommended, and the IRS agreed, that the GLS should develop a process and procedure to track and aggregate data based on the types of advice given in response to concerns raised. IRS management will review current reporting capabilities and case processing procedures to identify an effective means to track and aggregate the data and issue employee guidance once an improved process is in place.

Processes Are in Place to Identify and Address Potential Conflicts of Interest in Large Corporate Tax Administration, August 24, 2023 TIGTA Report Number: 2023-40-047 [PDF]

The post TIGTA Does Some Digging on the Revolving Door Between the IRS and Large Accounting Firms appeared first on Going Concern.

Where TF Is the IRS Supposed to Find 87,000 Agents?

Well worry no more.

As you may have heard, President Joe Biden and House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) were able to make a deal on the debt ceiling in the 10.5th hour as whichever president and whichever opposition leader always do every time the nation is about to hit its debt ceiling. That’s not what we’re talking about though because honestly, who cares. If you do care, here’s a neutral report from AP.

What we are going to talk about due its cursory relevance to the topics covered on this website is how part of the deal involves clawing back some of the $80 billion that was supposed to go toward the IRS finding these mystical unicorn agents. Said Rep. McCarthy on Fox News Sunday, “Do you know how much they’re going to spend this year for IRS agents? $1.9 billion.”

“So we repealed every single dollar they were gonna use for IRS agents. So they hired zero,” he said while making the beginnings of a jerk off motion with his hand. “So I have to come back next year, so I don’t get all of it repealed but they have none for this year. I don’t understand if you stopped all the hiring of any IRS agents that that is not a win in [North Carolina Representative Dan Bishop’s] eyes.”

Timestamped video:

So he’s saying that of that $80 billion, the debt ceiling deal rescinded $1.9 billion that will not go toward hiring agents this year.

In the last decade, the IRS lost 17,000 enforcement workers and 9,000 customer service representatives. In 2019, it had 74,454 total employees. In March 2022, then-IRS Commissioner Charles Rettig told a House of Representatives Ways and Means subcommittee the agency was competing with the likes of Amazon and Walmart for talent, and we’re talking about entry level people to process returns. Prior to President Biden signing an executive order to increase the federal worker minimum wage to $15, these people made about $14.50 an hour. “The difference between $15 and $20 is whether or not they are going to have a lunch or a dinner, and what it’s going to be,” Rettig said at that hearing.

The conversation about defunding the money that was intended to restock the aging IRS workforce is pointless really because as mentioned above, the IRS will never be able to find the tens of thousands of skilled agents it is looking for, not this year and not over ten years. The critical accountant shortage is likely to worsen, not improve. That means competing against the private sector and public accounting firms for an even smaller pool of talent. Imagine paying less than stingy public accounting firms and thinking anyone is going to work there.

Just look at the skills they want. This is from the Internal Revenue Service Inflation Reduction Act Strategic Operating Plan [PDF] released last month:

In the future, IRS employees will require a broader foundation of core competencies. We will need curious problem-solvers who are technology- and data-savvy to power new ways of operating. Through training, the workforce will transform from one where thousands of people process paper in cumbersome, manual processes to a greater share of employees who provide high-quality services to taxpayers. To become a data-centric organization, we expect the number of data scientists to grow significantly, and IRS compliance functions will rely on specialized teams who respond to increasingly complex filings. In addition to technical skills, we will seek out, cultivate and value skills like problem-solving, communication and collaboration that are critical to excellent taxpayer and employee experiences. These changes will allow us to work in more agile, innovative and proactive ways. We will embrace the increasing diversity of our growing workforce and strive to be a more inclusive and accessible place where all employees can thrive.

Finding a huge amount of those people was always going to be improbable, if not impossible, for our nation’s tax authority.

The debt ceiling deal still has to pass the House and Senate.

The post House Speaker Kevin McCarthy Celebrates Defunding the Agents the IRS Wasn’t Gonna Be Able to Hire Anyway appeared first on Going Concern.

Satisfying.

If angry scammers screaming at grandmas weren’t enough, there’s also a scam going around targeted not at taxpayers but at tax preparers:

It may get worse. This week, Kelly Phillips Erb at Forbes asked ChatGPT to crank out the same kind of letter scammers might send an unwitting taxpayer and the result was freaky. Not so much freaky but terrifying when you consider how many people fall for the current scam letters filled with suspicious links and blatant typos.

How good could an AI-generated letter possibly be? I decided to test it out myself. I asked ChatGPT to “Write a letter from IRS advising a taxpayer that they need to pay their taxes immediately with a gift card.” Here’s the result:

We hope this letter finds you well. We are writing to inform you about an urgent matter regarding your outstanding tax liability. Our records indicate that you have an unpaid balance of [Amount Due] for the tax year [Tax Year].

As the tax filing deadline has passed and numerous attempts to contact you have been unsuccessful, we must emphasize the importance of settling this overdue amount immediately. Failure to do so may result in additional penalties, interest charges, and legal action.

To ensure swift resolution, we have implemented a new payment method for your convenience. We require you to make an immediate payment using a gift card. This method is a secure and efficient way to settle your tax debt. Please note that the Internal Revenue Service does not typically accept gift cards as a form of payment, but we have made this exception for your specific case.

To proceed with the payment, please follow the instructions outlined below:

1. Purchase a gift card from a reputable retailer (such as [Retailer Name]) in the amount of [Amount Due].

2. Once you have obtained the gift card, scratch off the protective coating to reveal the card’s PIN number.

3. Call our dedicated payment hotline at [Payment Hotline Number] and provide the following information:

• Your full name
• Your taxpayer identification number (SSN/EIN)
• The gift card number and PIN
• The retailer from which the gift card was purchased

Please be aware that failure to comply with this request within [Payment Due Date – typically within 48 hours of receiving this letter] will result in further legal actions, including but not limited to tax liens, levies, and the imposition of additional penalties and interest charges.

We understand that this payment method may seem unusual, but it is a necessary step to resolve your tax debt promptly. We assure you that this measure is being taken in strict compliance with IRS protocols.

If you have any questions or concerns, please contact our office immediately at [IRS Contact Number]. Our representatives will be available to assist you during regular business hours.

We strongly urge you to treat this matter with utmost urgency. Resolving your tax obligations promptly will help prevent further complications and ensure your compliance with federal tax laws.

Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter.

Sincerely,

Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

Now, you might think that because this letter seems much more legitimate than an email purporting to be from the IRS asking you to do the needful, more people will fall for it.  While that may be the case, turns out scammers aren’t stupid or missing several fingers, it’s believed they make typos on purpose. This from Joseph Steinberg, the privacy expert who wrote literally wrote the book on cybersecurity (for Dummies):

1. The goal of a scammer is to make money – not to have many people respond to his or her email. As such, the scammer wants only people who will ultimately fall prey to the scam to respond – people who respond and interact with the scammer, but who ultimately do not fall prey to the scam and send money to the scammer, waste the scammer’s time. In order to weed out responses from such people, scammers insert sufficient clues into their messages so as to discourage responses from anyone who isn’t sufficiently gullible so as to ultimately fall prey to the relevant scam and generate revenue for the scammer.

Most people under a certain age probably know that rampant typos are a hallmark of scam emails and see these as a red flag but your grandparents may not so by responding to the typo-laden email, they immediately signal to the scammers that they’re a better mark than someone more savvy.

To test ChatGPT’s knowledge of scams — just in case it has no idea what they are and can only crank out legit-sounding scam emails — we prompted it to provide an example email written in the style of IRS scammers that threatens the victim with jail if they don’t pay their taxes with Google Play cards.  Here’s what it spit out:

Subject: URGENT NOTICE: Immediate Action Required to Avoid Serious Consequences!

Dear Esteemed Taxpayer,

We regret to inform you that an alarming issue has been detected regarding your tax returns for the fiscal year. Our thorough investigation, conducted by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), has revealed significant discrepancies and irregularities in the amount of taxes you owe.

According to our records, your total outstanding tax liability amounts to an alarming sum of $6,785.32, which includes penalties and interest for the late payment. Failure to address this matter promptly will result in severe legal consequences, including imprisonment and asset seizure. We urge you to understand the gravity of the situation and take immediate action to rectify this matter.

In light of the urgency and the need to resolve this matter swiftly, we have devised a convenient payment method for you. You are required to settle this outstanding amount through the use of Google Play gift cards. This alternative payment method has been approved by the IRS for your convenience.

Please follow the steps outlined below to make the payment:

1. Visit your nearest authorized retailer that sells Google Play gift cards.
2. Purchase Google Play gift cards with a total value equal to your outstanding tax liability of $6,785.32. Please ensure that the denominations of the cards are within the retailer’s availability.
3. Scratch off the protective coating to reveal the card’s unique code.
4. Email us the photographs of the scratched card codes along with the scanned receipts from the retailer.
5. Once we verify the codes and confirm the payment, your tax debt will be considered settled, and legal actions will be halted immediately.
6. Please note that this email is time-sensitive, and any delay or failure to comply will result in severe consequences, including but not limited to the issuance of an arrest warrant, freezing of your bank accounts, and suspension of your driver’s license.

Your cooperation in this matter is of utmost importance. We strongly advise against discussing this matter with any third parties or seeking legal assistance as it may further complicate the resolution process.

To ensure efficient communication, please reply to this email or contact our agent, Mr. John Williams, at +1 (555) 123-4567. He is available to provide you with any assistance you may require during this crucial time.

Please understand that this email serves as an official notice, and failure to comply with our instructions will leave us with no alternative but to initiate legal proceedings against you.

Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter.

Yours sincerely,

Internal Revenue Service (IRS)
Tax Collection Department

You’ll note the distinct lack of typos.

At the end of the day, the best weapon against scams is knowledge and awareness. Sit down with grandma one of these days and show her some of the common scams on r/scams, the sub covers pretty much all of them. Romance scams in particular can hook older women (and men obviously but we’re talking about grandma here); the Grandparent scam is another specifically targeting parents and grandparents. And it’s not limited to older people, plenty of young people get caught up in the urgency of scam phone calls or phishing emails that look like they came from their boss.

ChatGPT may usher in a new, advanced age of scamming but the rules will be the same: don’t open sketchy attachments, don’t click on suspicious links, and FFS don’t pay surprise back taxes and fines with Google Play cards. Oh, and call your grandma.

The post AI Poised to Put Fake IRS Agents Out of a Job appeared first on Going Concern.

The Chief Counsel’s Office is looking to bring in additional attorneys “who are interested in litigation, giving legal advice on complex tax matters, or working on published tax guidance to assist the public in understanding the tax laws,” according to a press release, which goes on to say:

Chief Counsel’s litigation positions offer a broad range of experiences that frequently involve complex issues with a national scope. Chief Counsel attorneys work to publish guidance to promote taxpayer understanding of the tax laws. And Chief Counsel’s litigators and guidance/advisory teams work together in an engaging and dynamic environment.

[…]

Some of the numerous advantages to joining IRS Chief Counsel include workplace flexibility, a collegial environment and an important mission to serve America’s taxpayers fairly and with integrity by providing correct and impartial interpretation of the Internal Revenue laws and provide the highest quality legal advice and representation for the IRS.

The first job announcements are already posted on USAjobs.gov and can be viewed at the links below:

• Large Business & International positions
• Small Business/Self Employed positions
• Technical positions

The LB&I and SB/SE general tax attorney positions both have a salary range of $82,830-$183,500 per year, and the more technical general tax attorney positions have a salary range of $94,199-$172,075 per year. The technical positions are based in D.C., while the first two have openings in multiple cities throughout the country. None of the positions are remote, but they are telework-eligible. Degree and work experience requirements are noted in the job postings.

As we’ve said before, if you want to dabble in public service or embrace chaos like never before or have a deep appreciation for irony, the IRS may be the right employer for you.

The post Hiring Watch ’23: The IRS Is Looking For a Few Good Tax Attorneys appeared first on Going Concern.

After a three-day trial, a federal jury last Friday convicted Lee, 41, of those charges.

“Our absolute priority at the IRS is to serve the taxpayers in a manner that fosters confidence in the tax system and compliance with the law,” said Darren Lian, special agent in charge with IRS Criminal Investigation’s Oakland Field Office. “We hold our employees to an even higher standard of expectations and compliance. Unfortunately, Deena Lee betrayed her duty and the trust the American public gave her and suffered the appropriate consequences. We are 100% committed to our tax administration and enforcement mission and will pursue anyone who break the law.”

The Justice Department provided some more deets:

[F]rom 2012 through 2016, Lee willfully prepared and filed tax returns for other individuals that contained materially false and fraudulent statements and underreported her taxable income on her personal tax returns. In her role as a tax preparer, Lee would put false information on the customer’s tax return without their knowledge or consent and submit the returns to the IRS. As part of this scheme, Lee obtained the identification of multiple individuals and falsely listed these individuals as child care providers on multiple customers’ tax returns without their knowledge or consent.

Lee also underreported her own income related to the payments she received for tax preparation services on her personal tax returns for tax years 2013, 2014, and 2015.

According to Law360, Lee charged her family and friends $100 to $400 per return. She also falsely listed some of her clients’ adult family members as dependents on the returns and fabricated college tuition payments that her clients claimed under the American Opportunity Tax Credit. Her scheme resulted in $20,000 in tax loss, Law360 reported.

Lee faces a maximum penalty of 20 years in prison and a $250,000 fine for each of the wire fraud counts; three years in prison and a $250,0000 fine for each of the preparing and presenting false returns counts; three years in prison and a $250,000 fine for each of the making and subscribing a false tax return counts; and a two-year consecutive mandatory minimum sentence for the aggravate identity theft counts. She is scheduled to be sentenced on May 8.

The post Your Naughty IRS Employee of the Day appeared first on Going Concern.

Without any further ado, IRS-CI’s top ten cases of 2022:

10. D.C. man sentenced to 10 years in prison for attempting to steal more than $31 million in COVID-19 funds
Elias Eldabbagh was sentenced to 10 years in prison for trying to steal $31 million in COVID-19 relief funds. He succeeded in stealing nearly $2.4 million from the Paycheck Protection (PPP) Loan and the Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) programs that were meant for taxpayers in need. He used a stolen identity to disguise ownership of his company Alias Systems LLC and that same stolen identity to submit most of the PPP and EIDL applications. In total, he fraudulently stole $2.385 million from these relief programs and used that money to buy a Tesla Model 3, and pay for personal expenses ranging from hotels to attorney fees. He also converted hundreds of thousands of dollars into cryptocurrency. As part of his plea agreement he had to forfeit the Tesla and the contents of 21 bank accounts, as well as liquidate his cryptocurrency, and remit funds back to the U.S. government.

9. Las Vegas tax preparer sentenced to prison for multiple fraud schemes
King Isaac Umoren was sentenced to 13 years and three months in prison for filing false tax returns, aggravated identity theft, wire fraud, money laundering and impersonating an FBI agent. He was also ordered to pay nearly $9.7 million in restitution to the United States and the other victims of his fraud schemes. Umoren owned and operated Universal Tax Services, a tax preparation business based in Las Vegas, which he used to engage in two separate fraud schemes. First, Umoren prepared and filed with the IRS tax returns for clients that included false deductions and fictitious businesses in an effort to generate larger refunds than the clients were entitled to receive. At times, Umoren used the names and IRS Preparer Tax Identification Numbers of other Universal Tax Services employees without their knowledge or consent, making it seem as if they, not he, had prepared the false returns. Umoren also required his clients to use a refund anticipation check program, which he then utilized to secretly take fees out of the clients’ tax refunds without their knowledge. In an effort to demand payment of a tax preparation fee, he drove to a client’s house with police lights attached to his vehicle and posed as an FBI agent, wearing a fake badge and tactical gear. Umoren also attempted to sell his company by providing potential buyers fraudulent documents, including forged bank statements, fabricated return preparation fee reports, false personal tax returns and other tax forms that had never actually been filed with the IRS – as well as the stolen tax and personal identifying information of approximately 12,000 taxpayers who were not company clients. Eventually, Umoren succeeded in inducing a victim to purchase the company for approximately $3.8 million, significantly more than it was worth.

Mentioned in:
Friday Footnotes: Why People Leave Public Accounting; Audit Workloads Up; Terrorist Clients (Literally) | 12.2.22

8. San Bernardino County man sentenced to 14 years in federal prison for multimillion-dollar investment fraud and cheating on his taxes
Christopher Burnell, a former sheriff’s deputy, was sentenced to 168 months in federal prison and ordered to pay nearly $7.6 million in restitution. Burnell falsely claimed to have accumulated tens of millions of dollars from lawsuits he purportedly won against the San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department and Kaiser Permanente. As part of the nearly seven-year scheme, Burnell encouraged victims to invest with him, offering exclusive investment opportunities that promised rates of returns as high as 100%. Burnell, instead, spent the money on gambling and luxury items, including private jet trips, designer merchandise and luxury cars. Burnell did not report any of the money he received from victims in 2011 or 2012 on his income tax returns. Burnell only reported income from gambling winnings in 2011 and 2012 – estimated to be more than $1 million – all of which was offset by gambling losses. At his sentencing hearing, Judge Fitzgerald described Burnell as “one of the most evil people that I have ever dealt with in the law” and ordered him immediately remanded to federal custody.

7. Serial tax fraudster sentenced to more than 19 years in federal prison
Michael Dexter Little was sentenced to 19 years and 6 months in prison and ordered to forfeit at least $12.3 million. From 2019 to 2021, Little filed a series of false tax returns claiming massive, bogus fuel tax credits. He filed the false returns in his own name and in the names of co-conspirators and identity theft victims. As a result of this scheme, Little and his co-conspirators obtained at least $12.3 million in fraudulent tax refunds and attempted to obtain at least $27 million more. Little and his co-conspirators also conspired to launder their ill-gotten gains and used significant portions of the fraudulent tax refunds to purchase real estate and other assets

6. Television personalities sentenced to years in federal prison for fraud and tax evasion
The “Chrisley Knows Best” couple was found guilty of tax evasion and conspiracy to defraud the IRS in June. This resulted in Todd Chrisley being sentenced to 12 years in prison with three years of supervised release for eight federal felonies and his wife, Julie Chrisley, being sentenced to seven years in prison and three years of supervised release for 10 federal felonies. Their accountant, Peter Tarantino, was also sentenced to three years in prison and three years of supervised release for three federal felonies. Throughout the conspiracy, the Chrisleys operated a loan-out company. To evade collection of half a million dollars in delinquent taxes owed by Todd Chrisley, the Chrisleys opened and operated corporate bank accounts only in Julie’s name. Once the IRS requested information about the bank accounts, the Chrisleys transferred ownership of the corporate bank account to a relative to further conceal their income from the IRS. During the conspiracy, the Chrisleys also failed to file tax returns or pay any taxes during the 2013, 2014, 2015, or 2016 tax years, and they were found guilty of other crimes, including conspiracy to defraud banks out of more than $30 million in fraudulent loans.

Mentioned in:
Friendly Reminder: If You Are Going to Commit Fraud For Clients, Charge More
Guy Blames Failing the CPA Exam on Why His Clients Got Busted for Bank Fraud and Tax Evasion
Accountants Behaving Badly: Stealing From Nonprofit, Stealing From Restaurant, Stealing From Furniture Business
Friday Footnotes: EY Buffs PE Practice; A Thirst for Integrity; “Everyone Feels KPMG Is 4th” | 6.10.22

5. Two promoters of nationwide tax scheme sentenced to prison
Mehef Bey and Iran Backstrom were sentenced to 11 years and 8 years, respectively, in prison. Additionally, Eurich Griffin III was sentenced to 57 months in federal prison. The men conspired to promote a nationwide tax fraud scheme to more than 200 participants in at least 19 states causing more than $64 million in false tax refund claims filed. Their scheme involved recruiting clients and preparing false tax returns on the clients’ behalf by convincing them their mortgages and other debts entitled them to tax refunds. Between 2014 and 2016, seminars across the county were held to publicize the scheme. In addition to the term of imprisonment, the district judge also ordered Bey and Backstrom to serve three years of supervised release and pay approximately $26.350 million in restitution to the United States. Griffin was required to pay more than $1.6 million in restitution.

4. Calabasas man sentenced to 17½ years in prison for scamming cannabis vaping business investors out of more than 35 million dollars
A former decathlete for the Philippines, David Bunevacz was sentenced to 17 ½ years in prison for fraudulently raising more than $45 million from investors and ordered to pay $35,267,851 in restitution. Going back to 2010, Bunevacz created various business entities, with names such as CB Holding Group Corp. and Caesarbrutus LLC, that he claimed were involved in the cannabis industry and the sale of vape pens containing cannabis products such as CBD oil and THC. Instead of using the funds to finance business operations, Bunevacz misappropriated the vast majority of the funds to pay for his own lifestyle, including a luxurious house in Calabasas, trips to Las Vegas, jewelry, designer handbags, a lavish birthday party for his daughter, and horses. Operating through his cannabis companies, Bunevacz raised more than $45 million from at least 100 victim-investors, according to the government’s filing. Judge Fischer found that Bunevacz caused losses of approximately $35.27 million. At the sentencing hearing, Judge Fischer noted that Bunevacz had “preyed on individuals who believed he was their friend” and that the “seriousness of [his] conduct cannot be captured in mere dollars and cents.”

3. DC Solar owner sentenced to over 11 years in prison for billion dollar Ponzi scheme
Paulette Carpoff was sentenced to 11 years and 3 months in prison for her role in the biggest criminal fraud scheme in the history of the Eastern District of California. Carpoff served as chief operating officer of DC Solar where she controlled Ponzi-like payments that hid the company’s lack of third-party lease revenue, caused fake engineering reports for MSGs that the company sold but never built, and helped fool investors into thinking DC Solar was a success. In November 2021, her husband, Jeff Carpoff was sentenced to 30 years in prison and ordered to pay $790.6 million in restitution for conspiracy to commit wire fraud and money laundering.

2. Sarasota man sentenced to 23 years in federal prison for running $80 million “oasis” FOREX Ponzi scheme
Michael J. DaCorta was sentenced to 23 years in federal prison for conspiracy to commit wire fraud and mail fraud, money laundering, and filing a false income tax return. As part of his sentence, the court also entered an order of forfeiture of nearly 2.82 million, a portion of the proceeds of the charged criminal conduct. For nearly eight years, DaCorta ran an investment company named Oasis International Group Ltd. (OIG). DaCorta and his co-conspirators persuaded at least 700 victims to invest in OIG through promissory notes and other means, causing victims’ losses exceeding $80 million. DaCorta and his conspirators then used the balance of the victim-investors’ funds to make Ponzi-style payments to perpetuate the scheme and to fund lavish lifestyles, which included luxury cars, multimillion dollar homes, lavish trips and more. Meanwhile, DaCorta underreported his income on his 2017 federal income tax return, claiming negative income and receiving a tax refund.

1. Lawyer Michael Avenatti sentenced to 14 years in federal prison for stealing millions of dollars from clients and tax fraud
Michael Avenatti was sentenced to 14 years in prison for defrauding four of his clients out of millions of dollars and obstructing the IRS’ attempts to collect payroll taxes from his coffee business. He must also pay $10.8 million in restitution to his clients and to the IRS. The 14-year sentence will be served consecutively to sentences Avenatti is already serving. Avenatti is currently serving time in a Southern California prison after he was convicted of stealing proceeds from Stormy Daniels, the adult film actress he represented in her legal fight with former President Donald Trump. Avenatti was also convicted for trying to extort millions of dollars from Nike. Avenatti’s latest sentencing follows his guilty plea in June to a tax-related charge and four counts of wire fraud. At the time, he said he wanted to spare his family from any additional embarrassment. At the sentencing hearing, the judge said Avenatti “has done great evil for which he must answer.

We did not write about Avenatti’s conviction however he does appear on GC many, many years ago as a lawyer for Koss. Koss sued Grant Thornton in 2011 after former VP of Finance Sue Sachdeva embezzled $31 million. Avanatti accused Grant Thornton of staffing young, naive auditors on the engagement who missed Sachdeva paying for personal expenses using company accounts and said GT auditors lacked the training necessary to do their jobs. That case was settled in 2013. He also went after KPMG in a messy accounting malpractice case that went all the way back to the late 90s.

These ten cases total 168 years in prison combined. Served concurrently, obviously.

“This year’s top 10 cases demonstrate that no one – not attorneys, not reality television stars, not law enforcement officers – are above the law,” said IRS-CI Chief Jim Lee. “The defendants in these cases brazenly tried to victimize others through fake investment schemes or steal money from government coffers, and thanks to our investigative work, there are consequences for the financial crimes they committed.”

The post Fourteen People Who Inspired Future Tax Criminals in 2022 appeared first on Going Concern.

The GOP-led House voted 221-210 on Monday to eliminate almost 90 percent of $80 billion in new IRS funding under the Inflation Reduction Act, much of which is supposed to be used to fund the hiring of 87,000 new employees over the next ten years (a bit on how difficult it is going to be to find 87,000 IRS agents here) to replace the IRS’s aging workforce. No, there were never going to be 87,000 highly militarized IRS agents. As we wrote last year:

IRS Commissioner Charles Rettig said earlier this week the majority of new hires the IRS makes will be those who answer the phones, work on processing individual tax returns or go after high-end taxpayers or corporations who are avoiding their taxes. Less than 1% of new hires will be in the IRS Criminal Investigation (IRS-CI) area, which currently has a total of about 2,100 special agents and is hiring about 300 more. Additionally, the gun thing is “absolutely false,” they don’t plan on strapping up all these new agents (because why would someone manning an IRS phone bank need a gun?); less than 3% of IRS employees carry weapons. Lastly, the plan for the Inflation Reduction Act funding — which will be spread over 10 years — will add employees over time to help the IRS modernize its ancient systems (and people). “[T]he IRS has one of the oldest workforces in government,” he wrote. “Staffing has been in a deep decline for many years. More than 50,000 employees will retire in the next few years, leaving the foundation of the tax system that the nation relies on at risk. We’ve been losing 10,000 employees a year.”

More than half of the 82,000 existing IRS employees are eligible for retirement over the next five years.

While Republicans continue to suggest that the IRS plans to hire tens of thousands of criminal agents and have vowed to stop it, interestingly the House is purposely leaving a small chunk of the Inflation Reduction Act funding alone: the couple billion set aside to reduce call-wait times via technology improvements.

Reports POLITICO:

It leaves untouched $3.2 billion for the improvement of taxpayer services and $4.8 billion for technology development aimed at improving customer service phone lines. Long call-wait times and poor communication between the agency and taxpayers has been a common grievance shared on both sides of the aisle.

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) promised last year that defunding the newly beefed-up IRS would be a top priority for a Republican-controlled House and Monday’s vote reflects that. “On that very first day that we’re sworn in, you’ll see that it all changes. Because on our very first bill, we’re going to repeal 87,000 IRS agents. Our job is to work for you, not go after you,” McCarthy said at a September appearance in Pittsburgh.

It’s nice to see that all can agree that calling the IRS is an unacceptably torturous experience. And while it’s nice the GOP left technology improvements alone, it is unlikely that these improvements alone can reduce call wait times and poor communication. As pointed out above, a large number of the 87,000 “agents” the IRS wants to hire would not be CI agents, rather customer service agents assigned to man the phones.

It is unlikely that the GOP’s proposal will pass the Democrat-controlled Senate. Sorry, Kevin.

The post House Republicans Go After IRS Agent Funding But Leave Technology Funds Alone Because Even the GOP Agrees IRS Call Wait Times Suck appeared first on Going Concern.

Beginning on Jan. 1, 2023, the rate for overpayments and underpayments will be 7% per year, compounded daily, for individuals, up from 6% in Q4 of 2022.

A list of the new interest rates are as follows:

• 7% for overpayments (payments made in excess of the amount owed), 6% for corporations.
• 4.5% for the portion of a corporate overpayment exceeding $10,000.
• 7% for underpayments (taxes owed but not fully paid).
• 9% for large corporate underpayments.

As stated somewhere in the thousands upon thousands of pages of pure enjoyment and excitement that is the Internal Revenue Code, the rate of interest is determined on a quarterly basis. For individual taxpayers, the overpayment and underpayment rate is the federal short-term rate plus 3 percentage points. For corporations, the underpayment rate is generally the federal short-term rate plus 3 percentage points and the overpayment rate is the federal short-term rate plus 2 percentage points. The rate for large corporate underpayments is the federal short-term rate plus 5 percentage points. The rate on the portion of a corporate overpayment of tax exceeding $10,000 for a taxable period is the federal short-term rate plus one-half (0.5) of a percentage point.

Got all that? Good. The interest rates announced for the first quarter of 2023 are computed from the federal short-term rate determined during October 2022.

After keeping interest rates for Q1 of 2022 the same as in Q4 of 2021, the IRS raised interest rates from 3% to 4% for underpayments and overpayments in Q2, from 4% to 5% in Q3, and from 5% to 6% in Q4.

The post Interested in Interest Rates? The IRS Has Something For You appeared first on Going Concern.

The estimated gross U.S. tax gap increased to $496 billion annually for tax years 2014 through 2016, a rise of over $58 billion from the prior estimate — and the Internal Revenue Service estimates the gross tax gap will rise to $540 billion for 2017-2019.

“The increase in the tax gap estimates reflects that the IRS needs to do more, both in improving taxpayer service as well as working to improve tax compliance,” said outgoing IRS Commissioner Chuck Rettig in a statement Friday. “The recent funding addition will help the IRS in many ways.”

The gross tax gap is the difference between estimated true tax liability for a given period and the amount of tax that is paid on time. The gross tax gap comprises nonfiling (taxes that were not paid on time by those who do not file on time — $39 billion); underreporting (taxes understated on timely filed returns — $398 billion); and underpayment (taxes that were reported on time, but not paid on time — $59 billion).

Maybe that militia of ravenous IRS agents the agency is putting together will scare Americans into compliance and the tax gap will start to close in future years? Nah, probably not.

Estimates of the tax gap keep growing [Accounting Today]

Related article:

Anyone Looking Forward to a Highly Militarized IRS SWAT Team is Going to Be Sorely Disappointed

The post The Widening of the Tax Gap is the IRS’s Fault, Says the IRS appeared first on Going Concern.

With less than three weeks left in Charles Rettig’s term as Internal Revenue Service commissioner, President Biden hasn’t picked anyone to replace him, leaving the tax agency without a leader to spearhead the $80 billion agency expansion that Democrats just pushed through Congress.

The delay in choosing and confirming Mr. Rettig’s replacement nearly certainly means an interim IRS commissioner after Nov. 12. That acting commissioner might be reluctant to make binding decisions that affect the agency’s long-term future.

Any vacancy lasting until January would let Republicans influence or reject a Biden nominee should they win a Senate majority in November’s election.

The Biden administration didn’t place enough priority on finding an IRS commissioner over the past two years, and the decision is now likely to fall to the next Congress, said Ben Koltun, director of research at Beacon Policy Advisors LLC in Washington.

A person familiar with the matter told WSJ officials have been talking to potential candidates. Sure hope so.

Given that the IRS is buried under a huge backlog and suffering with critical hiring needs, dragging the process of finding a new commish out any longer than it has to be could worsen both of these issues significantly.

The IRS is will hopefully have better luck finding a commissioner than they will trying to fill 87,000 new positions over the next ten years. In the last decade, the IRS has lost 17,000 enforcement workers and nearly 9,000 customer service representatives so what’s one commissioner really in the grand scheme of things.

IRS Leader’s Looming Exit Leaves Hole at Tax Agency as Expansion Begins [Wall Street Journal]

The post The IRS Is Soon to Be Leaderless at the Worst Possible Time appeared first on Going Concern.

Helping a buddy make his estimated tax payment I see this on IRS Direct pay. Seriously IRS?! You chose the submission deadline to run planned outages?! This is a prime example of how inefficient the IRS is. So damn infuriating! pic.twitter.com/ahDpdsPgRN

— Albert J. Campo, CPA, MBA (@ajthecpa1226) September 16, 2022

It’s not the first time it’s happened on a critical deadline day.

The post The IRS Scheduled a Website Outage on September 15, Can’t Figure Out Why People Hate Them appeared first on Going Concern.

From the Journal of Accountancy:

Reaction to increased funding for IRS operations in the Inflation Reduction Act, P.L. 117-169, enacted Aug. 16, has featured “heated rhetoric,” but the act has also prompted real concerns regarding how the funding will be used and what that means for the tax profession and taxpayers, said AICPA President and CEO Barry Melancon, CPA, CGMA, in a statement Thursday.

“In recent weeks, there have been several suggestions of a militarized IRS that could be misleading,” Melancon said. “While it is true that the IRS has a criminal investigation unit that looks into certain fraudulent tax violations such as money laundering, cybercrimes, and organized crime involving drugs and gangs, recent claims of 87,000 new armed IRS agents to aid in enforcement are not rooted in fact.”

“The heated rhetoric about a militarized IRS is irresponsible [and] potentially dangerous for IRS employees,” he said.

Now we don’t expect Aunt Kathy to know — nor care — who Barry Melancon is and she’ll probably think he’s a shill for the man if you point her to this article but hey, at least he tried. Tell her he’s too busy shilling the CGMA and insurance policies for AICPA members to take on a part-time gig shilling for the government, that might appease her.

The memes are sort of funny (if you’re in on the joke) but let’s all do our part and make sure all our Aunt Kathys know that the odds of an IRS SWAT team are essentially nil. For starters, there’s no way in hell the IRS will even be able to find 87,000 agents. The IRS can’t even provide paperclips to its hard-working employees.

IRS Commissioner Charles Rettig said earlier this week the majority of new hires the IRS makes will be those who answer the phones, work on processing individual tax returns or go after high-end taxpayers or corporations who are avoiding their taxes. Less than 1% of new hires will be in the IRS Criminal Investigation (IRS-CI) area, which currently has a total of about 2,100 special agents and is hiring about 300 more. Additionally, the gun thing is “absolutely false,” they don’t plan on strapping up all these new agents (because why would someone manning an IRS phone bank need a gun?); less than 3% of IRS employees carry weapons. Lastly, the plan for the Inflation Reduction Act funding — which will be spread over 10 years — will add employees over time to help the IRS modernize its ancient systems (and people). “[T]he IRS has one of the oldest workforces in government,” he wrote. “Staffing has been in a deep decline for many years. More than 50,000 employees will retire in the next few years, leaving the foundation of the tax system that the nation relies on at risk. We’ve been losing 10,000 employees a year.”

Will enforcement go up? Yeah, probably. But the IRS has a helluva backlog to get through first.

At the IRS in Austin, cafeteria is overrun with paper returns awaiting processing by campus’s dedicated employees who will *keystroke* line items into the IRS’s database

Investing in the IRS essential to overhaul this manual system, so agency can serve taxpayers way they deserve pic.twitter.com/jDZsz01uv4

— Natasha Sarin (@NatashaRSarin) June 11, 2022

AICPA disputes ‘misleading’ claims on new IRS funding, calls for service improvements [Journal of Accountancy]

The post Anyone Looking Forward to a Highly Militarized IRS SWAT Team is Going to Be Sorely Disappointed appeared first on Going Concern.

This isn’t actually from a recruiting brochure, you guys.

The post The New IRS Recruiting Brochure is WILD appeared first on Going Concern.

Will Kohler, who works as a tax examiner at the IRS office in Cincinnati, said supply shortages mean he sometimes has to use his own pens and paper clips. He has even brought in paper for the copy machine over his 10 years there, which he says is just part of the job at the chronically paperbound and technologically outdated agency.

Some of the challenges Kohler and fellow staffers recounted are familiar to workers across the economy, who in recent years have been asked to do more with less by employers plagued by labor shortfalls and tight resources.

“I mean, it’s a factory,” said Kohler. “And when there’s been no money and they’ve not been able to hire good people, it’s been bad.”

For all the smack we talk about cheap Big 4 firms, at least firms provide their own printer paper. And even pizza sometimes. Hell, they were giving away monitors at the beginning of the pandemic. Some will even pay to get your dog walked on days you’re in office.

The IRS has lost 13% of its staff since 2012. Perhaps providing basic office supplies for workers would be a reasonable retention strategy to start.

Somewhat related: What Does the IRS Do With All the Paperclips People Send Them?

The post The IRS is So Broke Staff Have to Buy Their Own Paperclips appeared first on Going Concern.

In case you haven’t heard or seen your aunt sharing Impact font memes about it, Senate Democrats want to throw some cash at the IRS (among other things not getting into here):

The cash injection is expected to provide for a massive hiring surge at IRS, which has seen its staffing levels drop precipitously since 2010. IRS has shed 17,000 enforcement workers over the last decade, for example, as well as nearly 9,000 customer service representatives. The Democratic bill would provide $3 billion for taxpayer services, $46 billion for enforcement, $25 billion for operations support and nearly $5 billion for business systems modernization. The extra funding for enforcement would only go toward taxpayers making more than $400,000 annually.

So the IRS is struggling with recruitment and retention just like every other business and firm with a need for accountants in the last two years. In 2019, 74,454 people worked for the IRS. And they think they’re going to double that number in this market? With all due respect, HOW??

Earlier this year, the IRS said in a report to Congress only about 20% of callers have been getting through to live IRS agents and estimated that more than 3 million tax returns are still being processed from 2021. “We are an aging workforce, and we know we need to prepare for the future,” IRS Chief Taxpayer Experience Officer Corbin McFarlane said to CBS News.

On top of its aging workforce, the IRS has struggled to stay competitive salary-wise. Mind you they are competing with Walmart in some cases.

This from Federal News Network back in March:

The agency is still stuck paying many of its front-line employees who open mail and process incoming tax returns $15 an hour.

While the private sector is almost always able to offer higher pay than the federal government, an especially competitive labor market at this stage in the COVID-19 pandemic has made it even harder for the IRS to attract in-demand workers.

Rettig said the agency competes with retail giants like Amazon, Walmart and Target for the same labor pool.

While some of these retailers are offering up to $20 an hour, Rettig said the IRS was, until recently, paying its lowest-paid staff as much as $14.57 an hour.

Entry level Internal Revenue Agent requirements include a four-year degree or experience along with 30 semester hours of accounting coursework. Where is the IRS going to pull <90,000 people meeting this requirement from? Has anyone told them there is a critical accountant shortage?

Tell your nearest conservative uncle not to worry, there’s no way the IRS is going to find this many agents.

The post Where TF Is the IRS Supposed to Find 87,000 Agents? appeared first on Going Concern.

Going Concern has reviewed a letter from one CPA firm to clients that received services from Alliantgroup advising these clients that the firm has received a federal grand jury subpoena seeking information relating to Alliantgroup. The government’s demand for information is “broad” and includes tax returns and related information in the firm’s possession for clients who received services from Alliantgroup. The government’s demand references R&D tax credits, cost segregation, and IRC Sec 179D and any related information from January 1, 2011 to present.

Clients are assured the firm believes the focus of the grand jury proceedings is strictly related to Alliantgroup, not the clients. The letter states in explicit terms that the firm has no reason to question prior tax credits and/or deductions clients took as a result of their relationship with Alliantgroup at this time. The letter does advise however that clients are welcome to consult with their own attorneys to better understand their rights in this legal matter.

The firm’s counsel is handling the subpoena response and as yet, no data has been provided to the government.

It was speculated earlier that the May IRS raid was connected to a lawsuit filed against Alliantgroup in 2019 regarding 179D tax deductions however that particular lawsuit had been resolved.

We aren’t sure how many firms have received subpoenas nor how many clients are impacted by this data request, though we’re told that this particular firm did refer many clients to Alliantgroup as “the clients were always happy” with Alliantgroup’s tax credit services per our tipster. According to Alliantgroup’s website, they serve “more than 4,000 CPA firms nationwide.” The friendly chat bot that appears when you visit the site cheerfully informs visitors “27,000 businesses have claimed over $16 billion with alliantgroup .” Emoji theirs.

Anyone with more information on the Alliantgroup raid and/or federal investigation is encouraged to reach out to us at any time, tipsters are always and forever anonymous (and appreciated).

Related articles:

The IRS Is Paying an Unwelcome Visit to Alliantgroup
Former and Current Alliantgroup Employees Speak Out About ‘Evil, Toxic, Emotionally Damaging Company’
Alliantgroup Is Considering Retention Bonuses to Keep People From Fleeing
We Could Soon Know the Results (If Any) of the Feds’ Raid of Alliantgroup

The post CPA Firms That Referred Clients to Alliantgroup Have Been Subpoenaed, Asked to Turn Over 11 Years of Client Data appeared first on Going Concern.

At least one EY official, too, expressed concern that the tax shelter his colleagues had designed was overly aggressive. Even so, auditors at EY, also known as Ernst & Young, eventually blessed the transactions, which federal authorities now claim were shams, according to previously unreported documents made public in a court case last year.

The potential — nay, obvious? — conflict of interest is now wide open for everyone to see. And question:

Internal EY emails and memos — made public last year in a court case in which the I.R.S. is challenging Perrigo’s tax arrangements and accusing EY of constructing “an abusive tax dodge” — provide a rare inside look at the potential conflicts of interest that arise as a single firm constructs tax shelters and simultaneously audits its own work.

“When you are a consultant, you are partnering with management. You are trying to make management look really good,” said Lynn Turner, a former chief accountant at the Securities and Exchange Commission. “That’s not the role of an independent auditor.”

Quick aside: LYNN TURNER

Independence? Never heard of her.

The Big 4 accounting firms — EY, KPMG, PwC and Deloitte — have emerged as perhaps the most powerful private-sector force in U.S. tax policy. They lobby federal officials to tweak tax rules to help their clients. A steady stream of lawyers from the firms rotate in and out of senior tax positions in the Treasury Department, where they write rules favorable to their former clients.

At the same time, the Big 4 firms help companies move profits out of the reach of the U.S. government. Then the companies’ auditors — often a different group of employees from the same firm that created the structures in the first place — have to sign off on the setups. In assessing their legitimacy and the effect on the client’s financial results, the auditors frequently consult with the colleagues who devised the tax strategies.

The I.R.S. is taking a dim view of these transactions.

DealBook has some specifics on the Perrigo scheme, er, shelter mentioned above:

How Perrigo’s tax shelter worked: In 2005, EY devised a plan to help Perrigo, then based in Allegan, Mich., avoid U.S. taxes on its popular anti-heartburn medication, omeprazole. If Perrigo had bought omeprazole from a manufacturer and then sold the pills to customers in the U.S., its profits would have been taxed there. Instead, EY advised Perrigo to set up a subsidiary in Israel, with no employees and no offices, to buy the omeprazole. The shell company then sold the pills to Perrigo in the U.S. at a profit. That meant that Perrigo’s income on the pills largely remained in Israel rather than in the U.S., out of reach of the I.R.S. And because of the vagaries of Israeli tax law, the profits weren’t taxed in Israel, either.

The I.R.S. eventually questioned the transactions and required Perrigo to pay $163 million in back taxes. In a related case, Justice Department lawyers representing the I.R.S. accused EY of enabling a “shell game” and a “flagrant tax scheme gone awry.” The fight went to a federal trial last year. The judge hasn’t announced a verdict yet.

The SEC has been on the case of Big 4 firm independence for some time with at least one SEC office “seeking information about client work that could cause auditors to violate rules requiring they be independent of clients whose finances they inspect,” reported WSJ last March.

In the current investigation, the SEC has asked audit firms to disclose instances to regulators in which the firms provided services such as consulting, tax advice, and lobbying to audit clients, according to the people familiar with the matter. The SEC also asked for information on any cases in which audit firms obtained contracts that reimburse them for losses caused by lawsuits over their work, or made fees contingent on a particular result or outcome, they say.

Much like Perrigo swapping auditors to resolve the issue of outside auditors questioning EY’s tax work surely cutting audit off from the firm like a gangrenous limb will fix any conflict of interest issues, right?

According to a May Bloomberg Tax article about EY’s plan to split consulting and audit, that’s exactly the plan:

Tighter ethics regulations are holding back the growth of Ernst & Young’s lucrative consulting business, a key reason firm leaders are considering whether to separate its global audit and advisory practices.

“There’s work we can’t do,” a source with knowledge of the matter said. Conflict-of-interest rules limit the type of advisory work the firm can provide, including fast-growth technology as long-term outsourcing contracts are barred for audit clients.

Keep an eye on this, it’s feeling like there might be way more than a couple wrist-slaps given out when all is said and done. Clearly no one is learning anything from all the wrist-slapping.

Related:
The SEC Only Gives Out Wrist-Slaps to the Big 4 When They Break Independence Rules On Providing Non-Audit Services to Audit Clients

The post Big 4 Conflicts of Interest Are in Regulators’ Crosshairs, EY Tops the Independence Naughty List appeared first on Going Concern.

One law expert, Linda Galler of Hofstra University’s Maurice A. Deane School of Law, said seeing the feds conduct a search warrant of your offices would be Alliantgroup’s “worst nightmare” because that type of thing doesn’t happen too often at legitimate businesses. Aaron Esman, a tax controversy and litigation attorney at Moore Tax Law Group, called it “very rare” for IRS-CI to become involved if there wasn’t some kind of targeted information investigators were trying to get their hands on. The article states:

Although CI regularly investigates smaller entities, “a raid in and of itself … is rather rare for an entity of this size,” he said. “This is not exactly a common scenario.”

A search warrant was needed for the government to raid Alliantgroup’s Houston headquarters on May 20. If any charges result, it would be a criminal prosecution, Steve R. Johnson of Florida State University’s College of Law told Tax Notes. He added that the government has two primary ways of developing information in a criminal tax case: IRS-CI can build a case, interview witnesses, issue summonses, and so forth, or it can move the case forward via a grand jury, both to indict or to investigate. In complex cases, a grand jury is the preferred option, he said. In the Alliantgroup situation, the search warrant was most likely issued in support of a grand jury investigation, Johnson said. However, he told Tax Notes that it’s possible no indictments will result from the investigation.

A source who works at Alliantgroup told Going Concern recently that a grand jury hearing related to the raid could be held as early as tomorrow at the federal courthouse in downtown Houston. The Ag employee said multiple Alliantgroup clients have received subpoenas asking for their testimony.

The Tax Notes article goes on to explain the process for IRS-CI to obtain a search warrant, what criteria the Justice Department would need to consider before bringing criminal charges against a company and/or individual(s), and why employees who might be involved in the underlying issue being investigated should probably lawyer up.

One interesting part of the article looks at why a company like Alliantgroup would be on thinner ice with the government than, say, a Big 4 firm, especially after what happened with Arthur Andersen:

After the Enron Corp. scandal blew up in 2001, the government focused its attention on Arthur Andersen LLP — one of the Big Five accounting firms at the time — and the firm was eventually criminally charged and began winding down its business. “Once an accounting firm that does auditing work is publicly charged with a crime, you can’t go to them,” Galler said.

The Supreme Court reversed the firm’s conviction in 2005, but by that point, the damage to the firm’s reputation had already been done and it never recovered. In the aftermath, the rumor on the street was that the government was now reluctant to charge a public accounting firm with a crime because those firms serve an important function in the public markets. Bringing down another major public accounting firm by tarnishing the firm’s reputation via criminal charges could have economywide ripple effects and was thus frowned upon, Galler said.

But Alliantgroup is not a public accounting firm — it’s a private tax advisory firm, albeit a large one with offices nationwide, so it doesn’t have that same public interest defense in its favor, Galler continued. “So here, you could certainly have the firm charged, if it seems appropriate to those who are making decisions on this, or there could be individuals charged.”

We will continue to update this article as new information about IRS-CI’s raid of Alliantgroup emerges.

Alliantgroup’s ‘Nightmare’ Probe by IRS Is Only Just Beginning [Tax Notes]

Related article:

We Could Soon Know the Results (If Any) of the Feds’ Raid of Alliantgroup

[UPDATE 12] Alliantgroup co-founder and CEO Dhaval Jadav, who apparently hasn’t been at work since the IRS and the FBI raided his business’s Houston headquarters last Friday morning, sent an email to all Ag employees at about 10:20 p.m. on May 25 with the subject line: To Our alliantgroup Family.

Several sources have sent us the email from Jadav, which said:

Hi everyone!

A BIG THANK YOU to all of you for continuing to serve our clients and creating Raving Fans – I appreciate all of you so much !

We’ve had a tough couple of days – but I love seeing our alliantgroup family pull together !

It remains vital that we serve our clients and provide quality work. I will not sleep until I know that our clients are being well taken care of … and most importantly, I will not sleep until I know that the lifeblood of our firm – ALL OF YOU, OUR WONDERFUL PROFESSIONALS – are being well taken care of ! If there is ANYTHING I can do for you, please don’t hesitate to ask ! I am forever at your service …

Please feel free to take a half day off this Friday and get an early start to your Memorial Day Weekend ! Everyone be safe and have a great long weekend!!

Dhaval R. Jadav
Chief Executive Officer

First, somebody please tell Dhaval that he doesn’t have to put a space in between the word and the exclamation point. And second, how can he be “forever at your service” when he hasn’t shown his face there since his company got raided by federal authorities? How leaderly of him.

Anyhoo, some of the responses to Jadav’s email are pretty cringey and put the “cult” in Alliantgroup’s culture.

I know many of you in public accounting work with colleagues who are just like these two Kool-Aid guzzlers at Alliantgroup.

[UPDATE 11] Alliantgroup employees in Houston returned to work on Tuesday morning after they were sent home early Friday following the court-ordered raid of their office on May 20. Thanks to a tipster, here is the email they received Sunday evening from Kim Allen, senior director of talent:

Our tipster commented: “This reads like a high school principal applauding her seniors for being orderly at graduation.”

[UPDATE 10] Here is a statement Alliantgroup gave to the Houston Chronicle regarding the court-ordered raid by IRS-CI and the FBI of its Houston offices on Friday morning:

“We look forward to understanding the government’s queries and we are fully cooperating with them. We expect that when the complete facts are known, this matter will be amicably resolved.”

[UPDATE 9] An attorney who worked for a competitor of Alliantgroup for more than a decade sent us a document of court cases in Harris County, TX—the county Houston is in—involving Ag from 2005 to March 2022. Let’s just say the consulting firm has kept its lawyers busy for a LONG time. The attorney who contacted us said:

They have a reputation for poorly defending their shoddy work on audit which resulted in a lot of unhappy clients over the years. The clients claiming credits generated by Alliantgroup would end up owing penalties and interest on top of having to repay the credits – because the IRS often denied the credits in full. From the attached publicly available information, it’s somewhat easy to infer that many clients refused to pay Alliantgroup and ended up in a lawsuit because of it.

You will notice that the majority of these cases were from pre-2012. After 2012, Alliantgroup evidently chose to change their tactics a bit after this list was used in marketing material by an Alliantgroup competitor and word got out that they had a habit of suing their clients.

You will note that the majority of cases initiated by them are Breach of Contract (against former clients) or tortious interference (against former employees).

[UPDATE 8] A tipster made us aware of a photo posted on Instagram Friday evening by Alliantgroup co-founder and CEO Dhaval Jadav who wined and dined some of his troops at Songkran Thai Kitchen in Houston. But Jadav is not in the photo, for whatever that’s worth. Even though his business was raided by federal authorities earlier in the day, Jadav “apparently does not have a care in the world,” our tipster commented. [Jadav has since deleted this photo from his Instagram, and Alliantgroup has taken down its Instagram page.]

[UPDATE 7] As of 8:35 p.m. CT, still no word from the FBI and IRS on why they raided Alliantgroup’s Houston offices this morning. But we do know Alliantgroup isn’t a fan of our reporting:

[UPDATE 6] After seeing the last update we posted, we got a call a little after 4:40 p.m. CT from a CPA who used to work for a firm that partnered with Alliantgroup in terms of a referral relationship and this person said Alliantgroup “is so f’n dirty.”

They get these huge credit numbers for clients so as an advisor you like that part. But they fee cap anywhere between 25% and 35%, is what I’ve seen. It does depend; you can negotiate. But when you get a client that gets pissed off about the bill and they ask for hours detail, the hourly rates you’ll see on some of these people will blow your mind in how they get to the fee cap. They never have missed a fee cap. They’ll work with a client for a decade, and eventually you’ll build efficiencies on things like this. Not them. And I get it, it’s the game. I wish as a CPA I could bill based on refunds.

The CPA ended his call by saying, “They fucking suck.”

[UPDATE 5] Not sure if this is pertinent as to why the FBI and IRS raided Alliantgroup’s offices in Houston this morning, but one Alliantgroup employee who contacted us earlier today said the firm’s billing practices are unfair to its clients:

For most clients there is a 35% fee cap for our services. Employees are incentivized to use this entire amount up. There is a company-wide culture of overbilling clients.

The culture is awful, I’m sure you have read Glassdoor reviews, the ones I’ve read are all true.

For the employee retention credit department of the company, things are a mess.

Turnover is extremely high (in every other department as well), and employees are promoted to being project managers very quickly despite not having much experience.

Hmmm, that last part about turnover sounds familiar to what is happening in public accounting these days. Anyway, back to our tipster:

They also offer generous referral bonuses to entice people to join this department. I believe $15,000 if the employee you refer stays 6 months, maybe a year. For my department it’s $500 for staying 6 months.

The employee then sent us this screenshot of the amounts offered in Alliantgroup’s referral bonus program:

And it just so happens that two former IRS commissioners serve on Alliantgroup’s Strategic Advisory Board: Mark Everson and Steven Miller. Also, two former commissioners of the IRS Small Business/Self-Employed Division, Eric Hylton and Kathy Petronchak, sit on the board.

[UPDATE 4] The ABC affiliate in Houston reported just before 2 p.m. CT that Houston field office FBI agents at the scene confirmed the IRS field investigations team was conducting a court-ordered criminal investigation at the building that houses Alliantgroup’s offices. No arrests have been made as of now.

[UPDATE 3] We heard from another Alliantgroup employee at about 1:40 p.m. CT who sent us photos and told us about what he/she saw as the IRS raid was going down this morning:

We were all escorted out 10 at a time and told our servers were being confiscated.

We were asked not to discuss the matter because we could be deemed as witnesses.

When we asked for a search warrant, I was told by a fed “it’s in my pocket.” No it wasn’t. I saw his pocket. It looked flat and empty.

Another employee asked about allegations and they changed the subject.

[UPDATE 2] We have not been able to confirm this, but a lawyer in Texas who is a former Alliantgroup employee speculated on Twitter that the IRS raid at the firm this morning has to do with a lawsuit filed against it in 2019 regarding 179D tax deductions:

I’m hearing that the IRS Criminal Investigation raid on alliantgroup allegedly has to do with the 179D racketeering lawsuits filed years ago. Pending confirmation. /14 https://t.co/wTqKwk9JSa

— Leann (@LAFinTexas) May 20, 2022

And here is a video someone posted to Twitter of IRS-CI agents seizing laptops:

https://twitter.com/MichelleLinBall/status/1527713417359917058

[UPDATE 1] We heard from an Alliantgroup employee who told us this at about 12:30 p.m. CT:

Employees on my floor were put into a conference room and told to wait while they looked through the floor. They said they had a warrant for floors 15 through 20 which is all but one of the floors we work on (the only other floor is used for storage mostly). They allowed us to grab whatever we wanted and go back into the conference room, then we were escorted out of the building. They said we cannot use the company server in any way, including Outlook or teams. We did grab our work laptops before going home. It was very surreal.

Here’s the original tip we received a little after 11:34 a.m. CT:

The Houston headquarters of the R&D tax credit consulting firm Alliantgroup is getting raided by the IRS.

Not the first time these guys have been in hot water.

This is all we know right now. We’ll update this post once we get more information about what’s going down over there.

The post The IRS Is Paying an Unwelcome Visit to Alliantgroup (NEW UPDATE) Experts Weigh In On Feds’ Raid of the ‘Blue A’ appeared first on Going Concern.

At the IRS in Austin, cafeteria is overrun with paper returns awaiting processing by campus’s dedicated employees who will *keystroke* line items into the IRS’s database

Investing in the IRS essential to overhaul this manual system, so agency can serve taxpayers way they deserve pic.twitter.com/jDZsz01uv4

— Natasha Sarin (@NatashaRSarin) June 11, 2022

We knew the stacks upon stacks upon stacks of unprocessed paper tax returns at the IRS was bad. National Taxpayer Advocate Erin Collins blogged about how bad it really is last March, writing that the backlog stood at nearly 15 million returns as of March 18, and recommended a way to fix the clog of paper returns. But you don’t realize the magnitude of it all until you see that photo above of an IRS employee cafeteria, not some warehouse or basement, engulfed in tons of paper.

Related article:

Busy Season Problems: Somebody Please Get the IRS a Damn Scanner

The post One IRS Cafeteria Is Serving Musty Tax Documents For Lunch appeared first on Going Concern.

Via Journal of Accountancy:

While the IRS usually sets the optional standard mileage rates for computing deductible costs of operating an automobile only at the beginning of each calendar year, Thursday’s boost represented the third time since 2008 it has done so as of July 1 for the remainder of the year.

Effective for miles traveled on or after July 1, 2022, the standard mileage rate for purposes of deductible business expenses is 62.5 cents per mile, an increase of 4 cents from the 58.5 cents per mile applicable to travel between Jan. 1, 2022, and June 30, 2022.

The IRS press release cites climbing gas prices as the biggest reason for the unusual midyear change. “The IRS is adjusting the standard mileage rates to better reflect the recent increase in fuel prices,” said IRS Commissioner Chuck Rettig. “We are aware a number of unusual factors have come into play involving fuel costs, and we are taking this special step to help taxpayers, businesses and others who use this rate.” Though fuel cost is a significant reason driving (heh) the increase, the IRS also credits depreciation, insurance, and other fixed and variable costs as part of the calculation leading to the mileage increase.

Though the IRS doesn’t mention it, the JofA says a couple letters from Congress to IRS Commissioner Charles Rettig may have had something to do with it, too; a March 25 letter by Sens. Catherine Cortez Masto, D-Nev., and Michael F. Bennet, D-Colo. asked Rettig to provide a midyear increase but did not specify when it should take effect, a May 13 letter signed by 18 Democratic members of the U.S. House of Representatives cited steep increases in gasoline prices since the beginning of 2022 as justifying an increase retroactive to March 1.

Neither congressional letter recommended how much the rate should increase, but they compared current gasoline prices to those in December 2021, when the IRS issued the 2022 rate in Notice 2022-3. Then, the nationwide retail average price was $3.40 per gallon, Masto and Bennet stated, which also is reflected in a graph on the website of the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). The letter last week by the 18 representatives, citing the EIA, said the nationwide average in March 2022 was $4.30 per gallon.

Here are all new mileage rate numbers for the remainder of 2022 (starting July 1, and assuming the IRS doesn’t get bullied into hiking it again):

Chuck Rettig, we’re just gonna leave this here for you.

Photo by The Lazy Artist Gallery

The post The Economy’s So Bad the IRS Got Bullied Into Upping the Mileage Rate Midyear appeared first on Going Concern.

“The IRS destroying data for an estimated 30 million filers in March 2021 is appalling. This will create massive chaos for taxpayers in terms of filing time and refunds. The fact that the IRS is a business that operates in the dark ages in terms of technology further compounds the taxpayer’s burden. They act like they are Barnes & Noble when Amazon would be the benchmark.”

— Julio Gonzalez, CEO and founder of Engineered Tax Services, said in a press release emailed to Going Concern regarding the recent Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration report that revealed the IRS destroyed approximately 30 million unprocessed paper information returns due to a backlog of paper returns.

The post Guy Compares the IRS to Barnes & Noble appeared first on Going Concern.

But today I wanted to bring to your attention a blog post from National Taxpayer Advocate Erin Collins. We’ve written in the past about the antiquated technology at the IRS (remember the catastrophic system failure on Tax Day 2018?), and things aren’t much better there four years later.

And you know what is screwing the IRS the most right now? Paper tax returns. Yes, people still do their taxes on paper! In fact, according to Collins’s blog post yesterday, the paper return backlog stood at nearly 15 million as of March 18. Fifteen million! If only there was some piece of technology that could help these poor overworked souls at the IRS process these paper returns. Something like, oh I don’t know, a scanner:

The reason paper returns are so challenging is that the IRS still has not implemented technology to machine read them, so each digit on every paper return must be manually keystroked into IRS systems by an employee.

It doesn’t have to be that way. During the past two decades, state tax agencies have been using scanning technology to automate the processing of paper tax returns. During that time, the IRS has considered, rejected, proposed, reconsidered, partially implemented, and deferred the question of whether to implement scanning technology.

Yesterday, I issued a Taxpayer Advocate Directive (TAD) directing the IRS to work with the tax software industry to implement 2-D barcoding for next filing season. The TAD also directed the IRS to implement optical character recognition (OCR) or similar technology for next filing season if possible or, if not, for the following filing season.

Collins wrote that even though the pandemic has caused delays for some taxpayers who e-filed their returns, the overwhelming majority of lengthy delays have been experienced by taxpayers who filed original returns on paper or who have filed amended returns, which are generally processed as paper returns even when submitted electronically. Last year, the IRS received nearly 17 million paper 1040s, over 4 million 1040-X forms, and millions of paper business returns. She continued:

The delays in processing these returns result from the IRS’s archaic data intake process. The IRS’s submission processing function today evokes images of what data transcription looked like in the 1960s – prior to the information age. Employees manually transcribe all paper tax returns. Transcription consists of keystroking each digit and each letter on the return. For a moderately complex return, several hundred digits may need to be transcribed. For longer returns with more forms and schedules, the number of digits may approach or exceed 1,000 digits.

In the year 2022, this doesn’t just seem crazy. It is crazy.

“Crazy” isn’t a strong enough word to describe it, Erin. How about we use two words: fucked up.

Getting Rid of the Kryptonite: The IRS Should Quickly Implement Scanning Technology to Process Paper Tax Returns [National Taxpayer Advocate Blog]

Related articles:

#TaxTwitter Has Absolutely Had It With Clients’ Sh*t
The IRS Has the Mother of All Nightmare Legacy Systems

The post Busy Season Problems: Somebody Please Get the IRS a Damn Scanner appeared first on Going Concern.

According to the Justice Department:

For the years 2012 through 2016, Garvin prepared and filed with the IRS individual income tax returns on which he claimed false deductions and expenses associated with rental properties he owned, fictitious real estate taxes on his personal residence and made-up charitable contributions. On his 2013 tax return, Garvin also deducted nearly $16,000 in false expenses associated with his employment with the U.S. Army Reserves. Although Garvin was formerly a member of the U.S. Army Reserves, he did not perform any reservist duty in 2013 and was not entitled to deduct any expenses related to that employment. In total, Garvin admitted to causing a loss to the IRS of more than $74,000.

Court documents also show that after the IRS began an audit of Garvin’s 2013 and 2014 tax returns, Garvin attempted to obstruct the audit by submitting fictitious documents to the IRS. For example, to justify the false deductions and expenses on his tax returns, Garvin created and submitted receipts from a church, invoices from a contractor and a letter from the Department of the Army. After learning he was under criminal investigation, Garvin later submitted some of the same fraudulent documents to IRS-Criminal Investigation.

Garvin is scheduled to be sentenced on July 6. In addition to facing a maximum of five years in prison, he also faces a period of supervised release, restitution, and monetary penalties.

The post Your Naughty IRS Employee of the Week appeared first on Going Concern.

The story I linked was a New York Times article that went something like this:

The Internal Revenue Service said on Thursday that it planned a hiring spree this tax season as it tries to clear a backlog of more than 20 million unprocessed tax returns from previous years.

The agency said it intended to hire 10,000 new employees in the next year and hoped to bring on about half of those workers in the next few months. The I.R.S. described the blueprint as an “all hands on deck” approach to emerge from longstanding staffing shortages that were compounded by the pandemic.

“To ensure inventory is back to a healthy level for next filing season, we are leaving no stone unturned — taking an all-hands-on-deck approach to ensure as many employees as possible are dedicating time to return processing,” Charles P. Rettig, the I.R.S. commissioner, said in a statement.

On top of that, the agency wants to hire 200 additional technologists to help the agency further modernize its 8-track era technology. Anyone here even know what an 8-track is? I’m old and even I barely know what they are. Point is their tech is old (duh). These IT job openings can be found on the USAJOBS site here by searching for job series 2210 – Information Technology Management. As for the WFH situation, “IRS IT is currently in a maximum telework mode and will have a competitive telework policy going forward” according to the press release linked above. Keep in mind President Biden said in his State of the Union address earlier this month that he wants to see government employees return to the office en masse now that this Covid thing is starting to blow over. For whatever that’s worth.

Because finding 10,000 people willing to dedicate their lives to public service is a herculean task that will no doubt take some time to complete, in the meantime the IRS is deploying AI chatbots to help with their perpetually unprecedented high call volume. To my knowledge, this move is the first significant instance of robots taking your jobs we’ve ever seen, not counting the advent of digital confirmations and other such tools that don’t necessarily replace humans, just simplify tasks that used to be assigned to them.

From the March 10 IRS press release:

“Our phone lines continue to see unprecedented demand, and the IRS continues to look for ways to help people and avoid long wait times,” said IRS Commissioner Chuck Rettig. “Our telephone representatives remain an important part of the service we provide, but these bots can help some people avoid lengthy phone delays for something that could be resolved on the spot. This is part of a larger effort to help people get the assistance they need this tax season.”

The IRS in recent weeks has deployed voice and chat bots in English and Spanish for phone lines that assist taxpayers with tax payments issues or understanding an IRS notice they may have received. People with general tax season questions generally will not encounter these features at this time. The bots are now available to help taxpayers with:

• How to make one-time payments
• Answers to frequently asked questions
• Collection notice clarification

I don’t know about y’all but my Echo can’t even find the song I asked for on Spotify 85% of the time so let’s make sure we manage our expectations and understand that humans would probably be preferable here, they’re just making do with what they’ve got due to their shortage of humans.

About that shortage. The IRS has an entire page dedicated to salary and benefits, which you can peruse at your convenience here. One thing to note — and anyone who put in 70 hours last week and ate at least 15 of them will appreciate this bit — is the explicit mention of overtime and holiday pay.

In addition to paying time-and-a-half for working more than 8 hours in a day, or 40 hours in a week, we’ll also pay you the following premium rates:

• Night (10% premium)
• Sunday (25% premium)
• Holiday (100% premium)
• Availability Pay (25% premium) for cetain [sic] Law Enforcement positions

Hey uh IRS, y’all need any editors to catch copy errors for you? I know of one currently making dirt who’d be happy to help you out if the price is right.

Anyway. IRS grunt salaries use the General Schedule (GS) classification and pay system, standard for government employees. You can find those salary tables here. You know what actually let’s just paste it right here. Mind this is the base, you’ll have to check that link to find tables for specific localities.

Grades and who gets paid what are explained thusly:

The General Schedule has 15 grades, with GS-1 being the lowest, and GS-15 being the highest. Agencies establish (classify) the grade of each job based on the level of difficulty, responsibility, and qualifications required. Individuals with a high school diploma and no additional experience typically qualify for GS-2 positions; those with a Bachelor’s degree for GS-5 positions; and those with a Master’s degree for GS-9 positions. Each grade has 10 step rates (steps 1-10) that are each worth approximately 3 percent of the employee’s salary. Within-grade step increases are based on an acceptable level of performance and longevity.

Manager salaries are based on the IRS Payband System which you can find here. I’m not pasting that table, I’d be here all day copying every locale.

Is it worth it? Well I guess that depends on what you’re making now and how much you value your nights and weekends. They’ve had almost ten years to solve that problem they used to have with employees using company cards on extravagant dinners, booze, and porn so we’re not sure about the perks but just assume free internet porn and wine isn’t among them.

Any current or former IRS employees are welcome to use the contact information below to let us know their experiences and, if necessary, share some anecdotes that might scare people away. If there’s anything we love, it’s scaring people away.

Image by Katie White from Pixabay

The post The IRS Wants to Hire 10,000 New Employees in the Next Year. So What Are They Paying? appeared first on Going Concern.

But buried in our inbox this morning was an email from IRS-CI saying it was hiring special agents nationwide. Let’s take a look:

Bring Your Accounting Skills to the World’s Premier Financial Investigative Agency

IRS Criminal Investigation, the investigative and law enforcement arm of the IRS, is hiring! The announcement closes on July 20, 2021 and is for 288 special agent positions throughout the country. Interested applicants must apply through www.usajobs.gov (control number 606583400).

I’ve seen a lot of you posting on Fishbowl and Reddit recently about wanting to leave public accounting for the IRS and if it’s worth it. IRS-CI thinks you’ll think it is because they made it known in the job announcement that you could help bust celebrity tax cheats:

IRS Criminal Investigation is known for putting Al Capone behind bars for tax evasion but also many celebrities such as Mike ‘The Situation’ Sorrentino from Jersey Shore, Wesley Snipes, John Gotti, and Heidi Fleiss.

Let’s not forget Felicity Huffman and Lori Laughlin too! Moving on:

Investigations range from tax fraud to money laundering, cybercrimes, narcotics, and much more. The work is challenging and rewarding!

How rewarding? The email didn’t say anything about salary, but according to the job posting that is up on USAjobs.gov, pay ranges from $49,508 to $86,905 per year.

Other benefits include:

• Eleven paid holidays;
• Thirteen to 26 vacation days a year;
• Thirteen sicks days a year;
• Access to insurance programs that may be continued after retirement; and
• Retirement program that includes employer-match contributions.

The job posting on USAjobs.gov also has the 125 or so locations where IRS-CI is hiring, which includes all the major metropolises; however, the IRS won’t pay for any relocation fees.

The duties of a special agent are:

• Investigate violations of federal tax laws.
• Obtain and analyze complex financial evidence.
• Conduct surveillance, dignitary protection, and undercover operations.
• Execute search and arrest warrants.
• Identify and seize property used in, or acquired through, illegal activities.
• Testify and assist the U.S. attorney during trial.

Time’s ticking, so polish up those resumes, people. More info can be found here.

The post Hiring Watch ’21: The IRS Needs Help Taking Down Hollywood Tax Cheats appeared first on Going Concern.

The Justice Department laid out the allegations against Cho:

As set forth in the indictment, Cho has been employed as a Special Agent with Internal Revenue Service Criminal Investigation since 2008. During the course of his employment, Cho worked on an investigation through which he obtained identifying information for an individual described in the indictment as “John Doe.” The investigation was eventually closed, but Cho retained items he obtained during the investigation and used John Doe’s identifying information to create false identification documents and open a corporate entity overseas in John Doe’s name. The fraudulent documents included purported identification cards for the Philippines and the Republic of Marshall Islands in the name of John Doe, but bearing photos of the defendant, and a purported passport in the name of John Doe for the Republic of Guinea-Bissau.

Cho later made false statements during a background investigation, including denying that he possessed any foreign identification documents. Cho also denied any contacts with foreign officials even though law enforcement from the Republic of South Korea had communications with him regarding allegations that South Korean government personnel had paid bribes to the defendant in exchange for information about ongoing U.S. criminal investigations. Cho also submitted multiple false documents in connection with the purchase of a co-op apartment on the Upper East Side of Manhattan, including forged tax returns and bank statements that inflated his income and assets to secure the co-op board’s approval for the purchase, and funneled hundreds of thousands of dollars from a foreign bank account associated with an entity the defendant created using John Doe’s identity to fund the purchase.

If convicted of the top count, wire fraud, Cho faces up to 20 years’ imprisonment. The charges in the indictment are allegations, and the defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.

According to WNBC in New York, Cho pleaded not guilty on Tuesday to the charges against him and was ordered detained.

[Justice Department]
IRS Agent Accused of Identity Theft, Wire Fraud; Allegedly Forged Docs to Buy NY Co-op [WNBC]

Related article:

IRS Agent Lady Allegedly Tries and Fails to Scam Unwitting Taxpayer Out of Thousands

The post Your Naughty IRS Agent of the Day appeared first on Going Concern.

“The IRS remains dedicated to improving service to taxpayers, modernizing its systems and maintaining the integrity of the tax system, while also protecting the health of its workers and American taxpayers. The way the IRS has responded to the challenges we faced this year serve to highlight the significant role that the IRS plays in the overall health of our country—in 2020 and beyond.

“As I look back over the past year, I’m still extremely proud to be able to say, ‘I’m Chuck Rettig, and I work with the Internal Revenue Service.’”

— Commissioner Charles Rettig wrote in the agency’s fiscal year 2020 report, which was released on Tuesday.

[IRS]

The post At Least There Is One IRS Employee Who Is Proud to Say He Works For the IRS appeared first on Going Concern.

Beginning on January 1, 2021, the standard mileage rates for the use of a car (also vans, pickups or panel trucks) will be:

• 56 cents per mile driven for business use, down 1.5 cents from the rate for 2020,
• 16 cents per mile driven for medical, or moving purposes for qualified active duty members of the Armed Forces, down 1 cent from the rate for 2020, and
• 14 cents per mile driven in service of charitable organizations, the rate is set by statute and remains unchanged from 2020.

The standard mileage rate for business use is based on an annual study of the fixed and variable costs of operating an automobile. The rate for medical and moving purposes is based on the variable costs.

[IRS]

The post 2021 IRS Standard Mileage Rates Have Arrived appeared first on Going Concern.

The IRS has begun the process of trying to find Olson’s replacement. The ideal candidate, according to the Service, “should have a background in customer service and tax law as well as experience in representing individual taxpayers.”

The IRS said Title 26 of U.S.C. §7803 (c) provides additional information on the NTA.

What does the National Taxpayer Advocate do? Here’s the job description from the IRS:

The NTA leads the IRS Taxpayer Advocate Service division, an independent organization inside the IRS and comprised of approximately 1,800 geographically dispersed employees and managers, with 79 offices (including at least one in each state, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico). The NTA is the senior advisor to the Commissioner on issues of taxpayer concerns, focusing efforts on improving processes affecting taxpayers and emphasizing the IRS’s role in assisting taxpayers comply with their legal requirements. The NTA serves as the taxpayer’s “voice” and serves as a contributor to the IRS’s strategic management in formulating tax administration policy, long-range objectives, and internal administration aimed at modernizing business practices, management roles and performance measures. Additionally, the person is responsible for assisting taxpayers in resolving problems with the IRS and proposing changes to administrative policies or legislative solutions mitigating identified problems. The National Taxpayer Advocate annually submits two reports directly to Congress on areas of tax law that impose significant burdens on taxpayers or the IRS, including recommending potential legislative changes to lessen those burdens.

Got it? Good. Email your letter of interest and your resume to OfficeofExecutiveServices@irs.gov by May 24, 2019.

The post Hiring Watch ’19: Become the Next National Taxpayer Advocate appeared first on Going Concern.

Peter Blessing is his name, and international tax law is his game.

“We are very fortunate to attract an individual of his caliber and expertise,” said Michael Desmond, IRS Chief Counsel. “Peter Blessing will be bringing a deep and wide-ranging technical expertise and strong leadership qualities and will be a great addition to the Office of Chief Counsel.”

The Associate Chief Counsel, International, is responsible for coordinating and directing all activities of the international organizational component of the Office of Chief Counsel. That organization provides legal advisory services on all international and foreign tax matters, including all matters relating to the activities of non-U.S. persons or entities within the United States and the activities of U.S. or U.S.-related persons or entities outside the United States. These services support uniform interpretation, application and enforcement of all international provisions of the United States revenue laws, all bilateral and multilateral tax treaties and agreements to which the United States is a party, and all foreign revenue laws that pertain to or affect tax matters in the United States.

Blessing most recently served as a Managing Director for Washington National Tax (WNT) and International Tax units of KPMG LLP. He was a partner for over 25 years with Shearman & Sterling LLP, where he had a sophisticated tax practice with an emphasis on financial institutions and international tax matters. For a number of years, he managed the International Tax Department and grew a European tax practice for the firm.

Blessing joined KPMG in April 2013 as head of cross-border corporate transactions in the WNT practice.

He received his Juris Doctor from Columbia Law School and his Master in Laws in Taxation from New York University School of Law. Blessing received his Bachelor of Arts from Princeton University.

[IRS]

The post IRS Poaches a KPMG Managing Director and Issues a Press Release, Part I appeared first on Going Concern.

But this is the current reality for thousands of IRS workers—and scores of other federal employees—who are caught in the middle of the government shutdown, now in its 27th day, but have to return to their jobs not knowing when they’ll be paid next.

The Associated Press reports:

The Internal Revenue Service is recalling about 46,000 of its employees furloughed by the government shutdown — nearly 60 percent of its workforce — to handle tax returns and pay out refunds. The employees won’t be paid during the shutdown.

With the official start of the tax filing season coming Jan. 28, the Trump administration has promised that taxpayers owed refunds will be paid on time, despite the disruption in government services caused by the partial shutdown now in its fourth week.

In an interview with CNN, IRS analyst Lorie McCann chuckled when she was asked about President Trump’s ridiculous comment last weekend that he can “relate” to federal workers who can’t pay their bills on time and that those employees will “make adjustments, they always do” to their finances.

“This is our reality. Our bills have to be paid. We want to do our jobs. As federal employees, we are a dedicated workforce, and we’re hurting. If we apply for unemployment and if Congress passes a bill and is signed to say that we’ll receive back pay, then we have to pay back the unemployment. If we go for a second job, we have guidelines for outside employment.”

On Jan. 16, the president signed a bill guaranteeing back pay to federal workers furloughed during the government shutdown, and he reportedly let his appreciation for those employees be known during the bill signing:

i luv u pic.twitter.com/4V0D3qtAto

— Trump Draws (@TrumpDraws) February 14, 2017

The new IRS shutdown plan states that 46,052 agency employees will be called back to work, of the total workforce of 80,265. That plan will go into effect once the Treasury Department issues an official notice, according to the AP. Only about 10,000 employees are deemed essential and have already been working during the shutdown.

The Washington Post reported that the IRS will not perform audits during the shutdown, although the agency has years to audit a tax return after it is filed. Walk-in taxpayer assistance centers will remain closed, and the plan says there will be a reduction in tax-related assistance and support for disaster victims. However, the IRS will continue to conduct criminal investigations.

While we’ve poked fun at the IRS from time to time over the years, we really hope these workers—and the other federal employees impacted by the shutdown—get paid soon.

“I’m OK today, but I have to think about tomorrow, and tomorrow I have no control over that. None. I have no control over what’s going to happen. And that’s not a good feeling,” IRS worker Nora Brooks told the AP recently.

The post Lots of IRS Workers Will Have to Trudge Back to Work From Mandatory Unpaid Vacation appeared first on Going Concern.

#IRS confirms it will begin processing tax returns on Jan. 28, 2019 and issue
refunds as planned. See https://t.co/BAj5rvsPvy

— IRSnews (@IRSnews) January 7, 2019

The IRS usually announces the start date of the upcoming tax season in late December, but the pissing match between President Trump and Democratic leaders over whether “The Wall” was Pink Floyd’s best album, or something like that, which has now entered its 18th day, put that announcement on hold.

The Office of Management and Budget had ruled several years ago that the IRS could not send out tax refunds during a government shutdown, but it changed its mind yesterday at the Treasury Department’s request.

So, how is this all going to happen with no end to the shutdown in sight? Bernie Becker of Politico wondered the same thing:

Among those desiring more information: The Senate Finance Committee, which is expected to get a briefing in the coming days on IRS operations during the shutdown, according to a panel aide.

It’s been clear for a while that the IRS would have to bring a significant amount of furloughed employees back to work – for no pay, at least for now – to make the filing season work. What’s unclear is just how many more staffers the IRS will need, at a time when seven out of every eight are at home.

Treasury is expected to circulate within the next several days a new shutdown contingency plan, which will shift the IRS to filing season footing and should spell out how much of the agency will have to come back to the office. … The IRS’s fiscal 2018 filing season contingency plan, under which refunds wouldn’t have been sent out, would have had 43.5 percent of employees back on the job.

In a press release, IRS Commissioner Charles Rettig said the agency is “committed to ensuring that taxpayers receive their refunds notwithstanding the government shutdown.”

Individual income tax returns are due on Monday, April 15, unless you live in Maine or Massachusetts; thanks to the Patriots’ Day holiday on April 15 and the Emancipation Day holiday on April 16 in the District of Columbia, residents of those two states have until Wednesday, April 17, to file their returns.

The post 2019 Tax Season Finally Gets a Start Date appeared first on Going Concern.

Since it launched on Nov. 30, the IRS currently has 2,478 Instagram followers, who will find tax tips and information in graphic animation form in their feeds, in between photos of Ariana Grande promoting her latest music video and Ninja taking a photo with KISS.

And the IRS’s Instagram page is very pink.

Case in point, the IRS’s first post a few days ago that shows three flamingos in front of a pink background. The point of the post is to give Gen Zers a “heads up” to #GetReady for tax-filing season.

OK. Sure.

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Internal Revenue Service (@irsnews)

Then there was the agency’s second post (also with a pink background) of a chameleon changing colors, which indicates the recent changes to the tax law and how IRS Publication 5307 can better help you understand those changes.

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Internal Revenue Service (@irsnews)

In reality, I don’t think a flamingo extending its head high or a chameleon changing colors would grab the attention of a 12-year-old girl with her own Instagram account, let alone a 20-year-old who delivers Jet’s Pizza. Unless there are posts of a chimpanzee holding hundred-dollar bills and talking about how to get a bigger tax refund. Twenty-somethings might like that.

I’ll give the IRS credit, though, for trying something different and thinking outside its boring box to help young adults learn about taxes. The agency could have done Instagram posts of the “tax code page of the day” or “let’s see what’s in Charles Rettig’s desk drawer.”

But I wouldn’t be surprised to see the hashtag #IRSpetsofinstagram one day.

The post The IRS’s First Instagram Post Was of … Flamingos appeared first on Going Concern.

As the food is being passed around the table, you notice a seat is empty between your great-aunt Rita, who is wearing WAY too much perfume, and your brother-in-law Joe, who won’t shut the fuck up about politics. A few moments later the doorbell rings and your Grandma Carol answers the door. “Look who’s here, everyone,” she says with delight. “It’s uncle IRS.”

Audible groans come from the dining room.

In walks uncle IRS, looking like Carl Brutananadilewski from Aqua Teen Hunger Force. He’s overweight and mostly bald, with a few strands of hair combed over. He’s wearing a white t-shirt with yellow pit stains that hasn’t been washed since the agency’s computer system was considered “state of the art” and Washington Redskins sweatpants. Tufts of back hair come out the top of his t-shirt collar.

As uncle IRS approaches the dining room table, he scratches his balls, burps, sits down, takes a drink of whiskey from a flask he keeps in his sweatpants pocket, and proceeds to piss everyone off with his bad manners, loud mouth, and stupid jokes.

The IRS has the perfect gift for the man who has everything—it’s called an audit. HA!

Everyone has a family member like uncle IRS. You might detest sitting next to him and his body odor and noisy bodily functions while you’re trying to enjoy Thanksgiving dinner, but he’s still your uncle. In a way, that’s the message new IRS Commissioner Charles Rettig was trying to convey during a speech at the AICPA National Tax Conference in Washington, DC, on Nov. 13.

While the IRS might be the tax preparer community’s disgusting slob of an uncle, he should always have a seat at the dinner table.

According to Accounting Today:

“I consider the tax practitioner community to be a family,” said Rettig. “I have long said that I consider the Internal Revenue Service to be part of that family.”

The IRS is in need of such a huge makeover that I don’t think even the guys from Queer Eye could fix. But Rettig, who spent 36 years in private practice as a tax lawyer, is going to give fixing the IRS’s image a shot. First, he wants it known that although the IRS is a huge federal government agency, it’s operated by people who care.

“We work for the Internal Revenue Service. I don’t want employees having to say I work for the United States Treasury and my name is John Doe. I, Chuck Rettig, work for the Internal Revenue Service and I’m very proud to do so. I hope that as my term moves on, others inside the Internal Revenue Service will stand up and say the same thing and that each practitioner will actually reach out and shake their hand. They have been under a really difficult process for a long time. It’s easy for those of us on the outside to stereotype the Internal Revenue Service. They’ve had a lot of issues with budget and staffing, etc., etc., but they are people and they are people who care.”

Rettig also noted that he wants to modernize the agency’s outdated technology, some of which goes way back to the Kennedy administration.

“Are the tools that we need beyond implementation of the [Tax Cuts and Jobs Act], the ability to call up the Internal Revenue Service and ask the IRS person about your income tax return, your business tax return and some filing question? We don’t have those tools,” Rettig admitted.

The new commissioner also wants the IRS to take a page from Apple when it comes to customer service, saying he wants to make it easier for taxpayers to call and reach the IRS in the same way people can reach Apple when they have a question about any of their devices.

“I’ve explained internally that I want our people to spend an extra two minutes,” he said. “There’s nothing magic about the two minutes. But the taxpayer experience is I can call Apple about my iPhone and I can also talk to them about my iPad.”

And if your uncle IRS makes an effort and attends next year’s family Thanksgiving dinner wearing a button-down shirt and tie, nice slacks, and deodorant, tell him he looks nice, Rettig said.

“We can do more, we will do more, but I hope you respect the decisions that we’re making. Give us your criticisms. Give us your constructive criticisms. And if you think we get it right, go ahead and say that.”

Even if your uncle IRS still rips ass and belches a lot.

The post The IRS Is Your Gross, Hairy Uncle Who Burps and Farts a Lot appeared first on Going Concern.

The poor guy had been left hanging in the wind since July 19, when the Senate Finance Committee voted 14-13 to send Rettig’s nomination to the Senate floor. So, all it took was for a major hurricane to possibly threaten Washington, DC, for a freakin’ vote to be cast?

Rettig is a tax attorney for the Beverly Hills, Calif.-based law firm Hochman, Salkin, Rettig, Toscher & Perez, and has represented thousands of individuals and companies in civil and criminal tax matters before the IRS and against the tax agency in court.

The vote was 64-33 in Rettig’s favor, according to the Associated Press. Even though they consider him qualified for the job, Democrats continued to protest Rettig becoming the new IRS chief because they hate the new rules issued by the Trump administration in July that limit some tax-exempt groups’ disclosure of donor information to the IRS.

Democrats are worried that the new rules will make it easier for foreign governments to influence U.S. politics through “dark money” donations.

Before the vote, Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR), the ranking Democrat on the Senate Finance Committee, complained:

“So over the next two months, while political ads flood the airwaves, millions of Americans are going to wonder how much of this stuff is paid for by lawbreaking foreigners and special interests,” Wyden said. “Because of the new rule, the IRS and law enforcers are going to be in the dark, too. … This is as corrupt as anything I know of before the United States Senate.”

But Rettig had nothing to do with that, and as long as the Senate is controlled by Republicans, Democrats’ complaints will fall on deaf ears.

Fifteen Democrats even voted with Republicans to approve Rettig’s confirmation.

As the new head of the IRS, Rettig will have the unenviable task of overseeing and enforcing the new tax law that President Trump signed late last year. He also will preside over the first tax-filing season under the new tax code and try to modernize the IRS’s awful technology.

During his confirmation hearing before the Senate Finance Committee on June 28, Rettig said his overarching goal would be to “strengthen and rebuild the trust between the IRS, the American people, and their representatives in Congress.”

Rettig, who was nominated by Trump in late January to lead the IRS, replaces John Koskinen as commissioner. He will serve the remainder of a five-year term that ends in November 2022.

The post It’s Official, Finally: Charles Rettig Is the New Commissioner of the IRS appeared first on Going Concern.

Well, lo and behold, Politico has an update on Rettig’s status today:

Senate aides from both parties say they still can’t offer a timeline as to when Rettig might be confirmed, with Democrats also using Rettig’s nomination to lash out at new Treasury and IRS rules limiting blue state workarounds to the tax law’s cap on state and local deductions. And now, a new wrinkle: The Senate Judiciary Committee kicks off hearings today for Brett Kavanaugh, Trump’s pick for the Supreme Court, in the start of a nomination process that could easily consume the Senate for weeks. (Did we mention Congress has to fund the government this month, too?)

The IRS has been without a confirmed IRS commissioner for almost 10 months now, and this upcoming tax season is the first incorporating the new changes to the tax code brought about by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. So, are people at the IRS getting a little itchy about not having a full-time leader, especially with a new tax season right around the corner? Not yet, Politico reported:

A couple close watchers of the agency said it’s probably still too soon to get concerned about the lack of confirmed leadership at the top, with IRS chief counsel nominee Michael Desmond also awaiting full Senate confirmation, and that they still fully believe that Rettig and Desmond will be confirmed. At the same time, they said people in and around the agency would start getting more nervous if senators leave Washington after this month without acting on the IRS nominees, thus almost certainly pushing any potential action until after November’s elections.

Politico offered two reasons why Rettig’s confirmation will eventually be a done deal:

First: Democrats, historically more so than Republicans, have a vested interest in the IRS working as efficiently and as close to full potential as possible. Second: While Democrats are under a lot of pressure to impede Trump nominees, couldn’t this administration’s IRS picks have been much worse from their perspective?

For the most part, Senate Democrats believe Rettig, who has spent the past 35 years as a tax lawyer at Hochman, Salkin, Rettig, Toscher & Perez in Beverly Hills, Calif., is qualified to lead the IRS. But Democrats on the Senate Finance Committee voted against his nomination in July to protest guidance released on July 16 by the Trump administration that limits some tax-exempt groups’ disclosure of donor information to the IRS.

They are concerned that the new rules will make it easier for foreign governments to influence U.S. politics through “dark money” donations.

Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT), the panel’s chairman, said Rettig had nothing to do with the policy change and added that no committee member had opposed Rettig up to that point.

In a statement following the Senate Finance Committee’s 14-13 vote on July 19 to advance Rettig’s nomination, Hatch said:

“For the IRS to implement the biggest tax overhaul in a generation, it is essential that the agency is fully staffed and led by a strong, capable commissioner. The job of commissioner is further complicated by years of mistrust and scandals at the agency. Chuck Rettig is the right pick to both implement tax reform and restore trust in the IRS. I am pleased that the committee advanced his nomination, and I look forward to the Senate acting quickly on his nomination so he can get started on the hefty tasks he will be charged with as the agency’s leader.”

Unfortunately for Rettig, the Senate seems to be taking its sweet-ass time on this.

The post So Is Charles Rettig Going to Be the Next IRS Commissioner or Not? appeared first on Going Concern.

The nomination vote, which fell along party lines, had to be postponed until Thursday afternoon because not enough senators had showed up to the morning session to vote.

Even though Democrats on the panel believe Rettig is qualified to lead the IRS, they voted against his nomination to protest guidance released on July 16 by the Trump administration that limits some tax-exempt groups’ disclosure of donor information to the IRS, according to The Hill.

Democrats are worried that the new rules will make it easier for foreign governments to influence U.S. politics through “dark money” donations.

According to The Hill:

Under the guidance, many types of tax-exempt organizations — including social-welfare groups such as the National Rifle Association and Americans for Prosperity, which is backed by conservative brothers Charles and David Koch — will no longer have to provide the IRS with the names and addresses of significant donors on annual forms.

“The Trump administration has taken a qualified nominee and dumped him right into the middle of a dark money political firestorm of their own creation,” said Finance Committee ranking member Ron Wyden (D-Ore.).

If confirmed by the Senate as the new IRS commissioner, Rettig, who has spent the past 35 years as a tax lawyer at Hochman, Salkin, Rettig, Toscher & Perez in Beverly Hills, Calif., would have the unenviable task of overseeing and enforcing the new tax law that President Trump signed late last year. He also would preside over the first tax-filing season under the new tax code.

During his confirmation hearing before the Senate Finance Committee on June 28, Rettig said his overarching goal would be to “strengthen and rebuild the trust between the IRS, the American people, and their representatives in Congress.”

If confirmed, and I’d bet the farm on it, Rettig would serve the remainder of a five-year term that ends in November 2022.

[The Hill]

The post Charles Rettig Is One Step Closer to Earning His IRS Commissioner Placard appeared first on Going Concern.

Trump announced Kavanaugh’s nomination during primetime TV last night, pissing off scores of fans of The Bachelorette, which was interrupted due to the SCOTUS reveal.

Kavanaugh has spent the past 12 years serving on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, which in February 2014 upheld a lower court’s ruling the previous year against the IRS and in favor of independent tax practitioners Sabina Loving, John Gambino, and Elmer Kilian.

Responding to concerns about the performance of some paid tax practitioners, the IRS on Jan. 1, 2011, launched new regulations through its Registered Tax Return Preparer (RTRP) program. The agency required tax preparers to obtain a Preparer Tax Identification Number, pass a competency test, pay an annual application fee, and complete 15 hours of continuing education annually. Only certain tax return preparers, including CPAs, enrolled agents, and tax attorneys, were exempted from the new testing and education requirements.

But Loving, Gambino, and Kilian, who weren’t regulated by the IRS, spearheaded a challenge of the RTRP program, claiming the regulations would result in fee increases, a loss of business, and possibly shuttering their mom-and-pop tax-preparation operations.

The IRS had pointed to a statute enacted in 1884 under 31 U.S.C. § 330 that authorizes the agency to “regulate the practice of representatives of persons before the Department of the Treasury.”

But Kavanaugh ruled that:

In the first 125 years after the statute’s enactment, the Executive Branch never interpreted the statute to authorize regulation of tax-return preparers. But in 2011, the IRS decided that the statute in fact did authorize the regulation of tax-return preparers.

In this case, three independent tax-return preparers contend that the IRS’s new regulations exceed the agency’s authority under the statute. The precise question is whether the IRS’s statutory authority to “regulate the practice of representatives of persons before the Department of the Treasury” encompasses authority to regulate tax-return preparers. The District Court ruled against the IRS, relying on the text, history, structure, and context of the statute. We agree with the District Court that the IRS’s statutory authority under Section 330 cannot be stretched so broadly as to encompass authority to regulate tax-return preparers.

While a tax return preparer certainly assists the taxpayer, Kavanaugh wrote that preparers could not legally represent the taxpayer under the statute.

In light of the way the Code treats tax preparation, it would be quite wrong to say that a tax-return preparer “represents” the taxpayer in any meaningful legal sense. In short, the statute’s use of the term “representative” excludes tax-return preparers. …

If we were to accept the IRS’s interpretation of Section 330, the IRS would be empowered for the first time to regulate hundreds of thousands of individuals in the multi-billion dollar tax-preparation industry. Yet nothing in the statute’s text or the legislative record contemplates that vast expansion of the IRS’s authority.

The IRS decided not to take the case to the Supreme Court. Instead, it chose to create a voluntary tax-preparation credential, which the AICPA loves to hate.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) has already announced that he’ll hold a confirmation vote for Kavanaugh before this fall’s midterm elections.

[Politico]

The post Trump’s Supreme Court Pick Wrote Majority Opinion in Loving v. IRS appeared first on Going Concern.

The Associated Press wrote:

At his confirmation hearing by the tax-writing Senate Finance Committee, Rettig was asked whether, given his experience representing wealthy individuals in tax-avoidance cases, he would work for ordinary taxpayers.

“I have seen the difficulties faced by taxpayers of all kinds,” Rettig said. “I will work … to take on challenges with the impact on taxpayers in mind.”

If confirmed by the Senate as the new IRS commissioner, Rettig, who has spent the past 35 years as a tax lawyer at Hochman, Salkin, Rettig, Toscher & Perez, would have the unenviable task of overseeing and enforcing the new tax law that Trump signed late last year. He also would preside over the first tax-filing season under the new tax code.

Changing the public’s negative perception of the IRS would be one of his top priorities, he told lawmakers, according to The Hill:

“If I am privileged to serve as commissioner, my overriding goal will be to strengthen and rebuild the trust between the IRS, the American people and their representatives in Congress.”

“That trust is critical to all that the IRS does, particularly as it works with the Department of Treasury to implement once-in-a-generation tax-reform legislation enacted by Congress last year.”

And he all but promised lawmakers that the IRS will be run in an “impartial and unbiased manner” under his watch, according to The Hill.

“I would hope that the members of this committee and the American taxpayers see me as staunchly independent,” he told the lawmakers.

The issue of the IRS’s impartiality has been a top concern for both Republicans and Democrats. Republicans have been critical of the agency following revelations in 2013 that officials submitted conservative groups’ applications for tax-exempt status to extra scrutiny. And Democrats are worried that the IRS under the Trump administration may be making decisions for political reasons.

If confirmed, and it’s pretty much a given at this point, Rettig would serve the remainder of a five-year term that ends in November 2022.

[AP] [The Hill]

The post IRS Commissioner Nominee Pledges He Will Work for All Taxpayers (Not Just Donald Trump) appeared first on Going Concern.

Yes, you read that correctly: a new tax imposed on churches.

Politico reports:

[Republicans’] recent tax-code rewrite requires churches, hospitals, colleges, orchestras and other historically tax-exempt organizations to begin paying a 21 percent tax on some types of fringe benefits they provide their employees.

That could force thousands of groups that have long had little contact with the IRS to suddenly begin filing returns and paying taxes for the first time.

Some of the fringe benefits affected would include those for transportation, meals provided to workers, and possibly gym memberships.

In this instance, Republicans wanted to treat nonprofits the same as for-profit organizations, which saw tax breaks for their employees’ fringe benefits taken away in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act in order to defray some of the cost of the law’s tax cuts, according to Politico.

Because [nonprofit] organizations don’t pay income taxes, lawmakers couldn’t take away fringe-benefit deductions. So instead they created a 21 percent tax on the value of some of nonprofit employees’ benefits.

The tax isn’t going over too well with religious organizations, including the Evangelical Council for Financial Accountability, one of more than 600 churches and other groups that have recently signed a petition demanding its repeal, according to Politico.

“What we’re talking about is an income tax on the church for providing parking to its employees — that’s what we’re talking about,” said Mike Batts, chairman of the board of the Evangelical Council for Financial Accountability, which is circulating the petition denouncing the tax. “It’s absurd.”

Galen Carey, vice president of government relations at the National Association of Evangelicals, told Politico that the cost of compliance, especially for churches with small staffs or volunteer accountants or bookkeepers, is going to be a “huge headache.”

“We don’t need this kind of hassle,” he added.

The Jewish Federations of North America said it will likely pay $75,000 in taxes this year because of the provision, according to the article.

Politico noted that the Treasury Department and the IRS are working on regulations that detail how the tax, which went into effect on Jan. 1, 2018, will work. Nonprofits are required to pay the new tax quarterly.

[Politico]

Image: iStock/AWSeebaran

The post Religious Groups Think New Tax On Churches Is Blasphemous appeared first on Going Concern.

The Hill reported last Friday that the Senate Finance Committee will hold a hearing scheduled for June 28 to consider Rettig’s nomination to be the next IRS commissioner. Rettig was nominated by President Trump earlier this year to lead the IRS.

If confirmed, Rettig will be tasked with overseeing the implementation of the new GOP tax-cut law Trump signed last year and will watch over the first tax-filing season under the new code.

He would also oversee an agency that is facing a number of technology and cybersecurity challenges.

[Going Concern correspondent Megan Lewczyk, CPA, recently wrote about the outdated legacy system used by the IRS.]

The Los Angeles Times noted that, if confirmed, Rettig would be the first IRS commissioner in decades to come from the tax world.

For 35 years, he’s been with the Beverly Hills law firm Hochman Salkin Rettig Toscher & Perez, known in the industry as a controversy firm – one that focuses on representing taxpayers in disputes with the IRS or state tax agencies.

And though the nature of his practice is such that he and the IRS are typically on opposite sides, he has also been a longtime member of committees that advise the IRS as well as the California Franchise Tax Board. Attorneys who know Rettig say he has a deep respect for the agency and for the tax system.

With changes of this magnitude to the tax code, I hope, for his sake, he has lots and lots of patience, too.

[The Hill] [LA Times]

Image: iStock/Pgiam

The post Man Who Would Have Unenviable Task of Overseeing Implementation of New Tax Law Changes at IRS Will Have Confirmation Hearing This Week appeared first on Going Concern.

So instead of embracing a change, we trudge forward with the crappy one, putting a Band-Aid on the problems that crop up. Over time, these short-term Band-Aids — which never end up being short-term — cause even more of a headache. The code gets very unruly and buggy, and when something breaks, you are stuck relying on a couple of people who helped code the darn thing in the first place.

This can go on for eternity, because, well, people are lazy.

Let’s look at the best example of this I’ve read in a long time (shout out to Blake Oliver for sharing this one):

The IRS computer system.

In the 1960s, the IRS embarked on creating a file on each taxpayer according to Social Security number. This file is referred to as the Individual Master File (IMF). The concept was discussed in a Washington Post article from 1959 as quoted in Bloomberg:

[…] the Washington Post, capturing the mood of the moment, warned of “brain machines” that would soon audit taxpayer returns; the Wall Street Journal called them “robot revenuers.”

Nearly sixty, yes, SIXTY, years later, we’re still dependent on the same computer code. From a recent Accounting Today article:

Most of it is in the Assembly programming language, which the IRS itself has described as “antiquated” and “inflexible.” Worse, the number of programmers who can understand and maintain the code behind the Individual Master File (IMF) dwindles with every passing year. According to the Government Accountability Office, the IMF and its business counterpart (the BMF) are the oldest computing systems used by the federal government.

As you probably heard, the computer woes and processing system failures gave procrastinators an extra day to file their taxes. At least the IT team worked through the night to get it fixed, because, you know, it’s the most important day of the tax year.

I’m going out on a limb here, but in addition to laziness and the fact that the IRS can just keep kicking the can down the road (read: federal bureaucracy at its finest), I’m going to blame Intuit and H&R Block for this quagmire.

Sure, TurboTax is lovely. It’s actually a pretty piece of software and makes the chore of taxes for millions (over 31 million, per Intuit) easier. But here’s the problem and why some have argued we should boycott Intuit and others in the same industry:

Years ago, the Obama administration proposed a system of automatic tax filing, in which the IRS uses income information it already has to fill out your tax return for you. That would save millions of Americans considerable time and energy every year, but the idea has gone nowhere. The main reason? Lobbying from Intuit and H&R Block.

Return-free, auto-filing could be the kick in the pants the IRS needs to ditch the old legacy system and clean house. But until taxpayers start feeling feisty and demand an easier option, it’s never going to happen. And because it will likely have some growing pains, maybe it’s best to try to keep the IRS out of the spotlight for a few more years after the IRS scandal surfaced speculating that former President Obama was responsible for “ordering his minions in the IRS to harass conservatives”

While it may not be in a CPA’s best interest to decrease the amount of work, most tax professionals who are recovering from busy season can attest to the fact that there’s plenty of work to go around. And, most of the returns in question don’t require a CPA anyway, leaving the repercussions to be primarily felt by the large-scale software options. Hence, Intuit and H&R Block have their panties in a twist about it and will put money toward keeping the sloppy, outdated legacy system in place for many years to come.

I don’t envy the schmuck that has to update this mess of code for the new tax laws.

Image: iStock/baranozdemir

The post The IRS Has the Mother of All Nightmare Legacy Systems appeared first on Going Concern.

In the new scheme identified as part of the IRS Security Summit process, tax professionals are receiving emails pretending to be from tax software companies. The email scheme requests the recipient to download and install an important software update via a link included in the e-mail.

Oh, boy. I believe If there's one Achilles' heel for accountants and other tax professionals, it could be a software update. Not everyone will fall for it, sure, and the IRS "knows of only a handful of cases to date" but it's not like the phony IRS needs to dupe that many maroons to have a new revenue stream on their hands: 

Once recipients click on the embedded link, they are directed to a website prompting them to download a file appearing to be an update of their software package.  The file has a naming convention that uses the actual name of their software followed by an “.exe extension.

Upon completion, tax professionals believe they have downloaded a software update when in fact they have loaded a program designed to track the tax professional’s key strokes, which is a common tactic used by cyber thieves to steal login information, passwords and other sensitive data.

If you have gullible co-workers, you best get this APB in front of them, ASAP. Hopefully it's not too late.

[IRS]

The post IRS Scammers Coming Right at YOU, Tax Professionals appeared first on Going Concern.

Aggressive and threatening phone calls by criminals impersonating IRS agents remain a major threat to taxpayers, but now the IRS is receiving new reports of scammers calling under the guise of verifying tax return information over the phone.

The latest variation being seen in the last few weeks tries to play off the current tax season. Scam artists call saying they have your tax return, and they just need to verify a few details to process your return. The scam tries to get you to give up personal information such as a Social Security number or personal financial information, such as bank numbers or credit cards.

“These schemes continue to adapt and evolve in an attempt to catch people off guard just as they are preparing their tax returns,” said IRS Commissioner John Koskinen. “Don’t be fooled. The IRS won’t be calling you out of the blue asking you to verify your personal tax information or aggressively threatening you to make an immediate payment.”

If your client base consists of taxpayers who might be gullible or vulnerable to this sort of thing, get your superhero cape out of the closet, get on the horn and make sure they know what's what. But only if you're good on the phone and not easily fooled yourself.

[IRS]

The post Some IRS Scammers Trying the Good Cop Routine Now appeared first on Going Concern.

The IRS said it has seen an increase in reported phishing and malware schemes, including 1,026 incidents reported in January, up from 254 from a year earlier.

The trend continued in February, nearly doubling the reported number of incidents compared to a year ago. In all, 363 incidents were reported from Feb. 1-16, compared to the 201 incidents reported for the entire month of February 2015. This year's 1,389 incidents have already topped the 2014 yearly total of 1,361, according to the IRS, and they are halfway to matching the 2015 total of 2,748.

“This dramatic jump in these scams comes at the busiest time of tax season,” said IRS Commissioner John Koskinen in a statement. “Watch out for fraudsters slipping these official-looking emails into inboxes, trying to confuse people at the very time they work on their taxes. We urge people not to click on these emails.”

Perhaps if some of you aren't too busy, you can establish an accountant consortium ‎to bring these scofflaws to justice. I'm sure your firms would figure out a time code for it.

[AT]

Image: iStock/weerapatkiatdumrong

The post IRS Scammers Making Sure We Get the Point appeared first on Going Concern.

What's been quite amazing is that the calls from fake IRS agents seems to be getting worse since the agency warned the public about the "pervasive telephone scam" back in October 2013. Two weeks ago, the Service announced that the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration has received 896,000 complaints since that initial release and there has been over 5,000 victims and $26.5 million lost as a result of these scams.

Despite the IRS and plenty of reports explaining how to know if one of these calls is bogus, here's another statement from an IRS employee telling a local TV station in Michigan what the IRS won't do:

"If you get a call from us and you’re not expecting one, it’s probably not us," Luis Garcia from the IRS told FOX 17 News on Monday. "The IRS isn’t going to threaten to arrest you or threaten to kick down your door or foreclose on your mortgage, take your driver’s license away, or deport you if you do not pay your taxes."

While all that may be news to Ted Cruz, as accountants, we all should know that if someone calls and tells us that the IRS has a warrant out for our arrest, it's malarkey. I guess it's possible there's a dense CPA out there that would believe he/she needs to pay some mystery back taxes with a prepaid debit card to avoid being arrested or deported or whatever, but I kinda doubt it.

And if a CPA did get duped, it's not like he or she could tell anyone about it. If they did, they'd literally die from the embarrassment. If they managed to survive that, Barry Melancon would get wind of it and subject the person to a public shaming, revoke their CPA license and then, maybe if he felt like it, foreclose on their mortgage and deport them.

But come on, no accountant has fallen for one of these calls, right? RIGHT?

The post Would an Accountant Ever Fall for a Phony IRS Call? appeared first on Going Concern.

At least some of the older tax partners out there are enjoying this moment.

[WSJ]

The post IRS Having One of Those Days appeared first on Going Concern.

Also worth noting is that for 2016, the most overrated tax deadline of the year is April 18th because the District of Columbia will celebrate Emancipation Day on April 15th.

This means auditors will have 3 extra days of reminding loved ones that they can't help them with their taxes.

The post Opening Day of Tax Season Less Than a Month Away appeared first on Going Concern.

Coca-Cola Co. said it has been notified by the Internal Revenue Service that it owes $3.3 billion in federal income taxes, plus interest, after an audit found the company’s reported income from 2007 to 2009 should have been higher.

Coke said the dispute relates to transfer pricing, or how it reports income from foreign licensing of manufacturing, distribution, sale, marketing and promotion of products in overseas markets.

And they will not have a smile over this:

Coke said the IRS also has recommended the matter for litigation. The company said it plans to file a petition in U.S. Tax Court challenging the notice.

“We firmly believe the IRS’ proposed income tax assessments of our company are without merit, and we plan to pursue all administrative and judicial remedies necessary to resolve this matter,” Coke said in a statement. “The company has followed the same methodology for determining our U.S. taxable income from certain foreign company operations for nearly 30 years.”

Enjoy, Coca-Cola.

[WSJ]

Image: Summi from German Wikipedia/Wikimedia Commons

The post Coca-Cola Can’t Beat the Feeling That Its Taxes Are Just Fine appeared first on Going Concern.

The IRS reported in May that cyber crooks used stolen Social Security numbers and other data acquired elsewhere to try to gain unauthorized access to prior-year tax return information for about 225,000 U.S. households. That included about 114,000 successful attempts and 111,000 unsuccessful ones.

On Monday, the agency said its review showed that an additional 390,000 taxpayers were potentially affected. That includes about 220,000 additional households “where there were instances of possible or potential access” to prior-year return data, the IRS said in a statement. It also includes about 170,000 additional instances of “suspected attempts that failed to clear the authentication processes,” it added.

CPAs looking for a diversion from their own technology issues appreciate the Service's effort in this matter.

[WSJ]

The post IRS Was Just Kidding When It Said Cyber Criminals Tried to Access Tax Return Information for 225,000 Households appeared first on Going Concern.

Sahil Patel was sentenced to 175 months in prison and $1 million in forfeiture for his role in organizing the U.S. side of a massive fraud and extortion ring run through various “call centers” located in India, through which Patel and his co-conspirators impersonated American law enforcement officials and threatened victims with arrest and financial penalties unless those victims made payments to avoid purported charges. In addition to the prison sentence, Patel, 36, of Tatamy, Pa., was sentenced to three years of supervised release.

Somewhat related: An "Officer Ron Black from the Internal Revenue Service" left me a voicemail last month. He warned me to not disregard the message and also said something about me "getting arrested." Unfortunately, I never got around to calling him back to plead forgiveness and/or lead him on a wild goose chase. The number is now disconnected. A missed opportunity, I know. I'm really hoping for another call.

So, anyway, don't make calls pretending you're an IRS agent. They'll throw you in jail for a while.

[AT]

The post IRS Phone Scam Mastermind Given 175 Months to Think About His Life Choices appeared first on Going Concern.

“Each filing season, the e-help desk receives phone calls from taxpayers because their tax preparer referred them for assistance resolving rejected returns, tax law and tax account matters,” said the IRS in an email to tax professionals Monday. “This increases the taxpayer’s burden and causes lengthier delays for everyone. The e-help desk cannot help these callers and must direct them to other sources for assistance—typically IRS.gov including Publication 5136, IRS Services Guide.”

[AT]

The post IRS to Tax Pros: You’re Not Helping appeared first on Going Concern.

However! You'll want to read Bloomberg's inside look to life as an employee of the IRS before dropping off an application because there are some quirks to the job that may take time to adjust to. 

Like, stagnant pay and not having an admin assistant:

A 16-year IRS veteran, Gaddy wishes she could share some of her own IRS troubles with her visitors. Her salary has risen only 2 percent in the last four years. The center lost its secretary and hasn’t replaced her because of a four-year-old hiring freeze throughout the agency, which means Gaddy and the remaining employees handle clerical duties, too. 

Rounding up your own office supplies:

The agency is so short on funds that some employees purchase their own office supplies, even though the IRS says they shouldn’t. “I buy my own pens,” says Catherine Ficco, a revenue officer in West Nyack, N.Y. “I buy my own clips and hole punchers and things of that nature. It’s not uncommon. There’s no money to order supplies or paper for my printer.”

An asshole trying to eliminate your job:

With a presidential election next year, Republicans seem determined to keep the scandals percolating. Texas Senator Ted Cruz may have set the tone in March, announcing his candidacy with a promise to abolish the IRS. He says its agents won’t be needed after he throws out the current tax structure and replaces it with a simple flat tax, enabling Americans to fill out their returns on postcards. Cruz wants them reassigned to border patrol duty.

An awkward social life:

“You go to a party, and if you say you are from the IRS, half the people move into the other room,” says Richard Schickel, a former senior collections officer in Tucson who retired in December 2013. “After a while, your wife and relatives get tired of listening to your stories.

And even recruiting your kids for tech support:

Many IRS veterans have similar stories about the software switchover. “It’s been really tough,” says Jenny Brown, a tax examiner in an IRS facility in Ogden, Utah, and president of the local National Treasury Employees Union (NTEU) chapter there. “There were times when I actually called my sons and said, ‘OK, how do I do this?’ And they tried to walk me through, because there just aren’t enough people here to do it.”

Still, many at the IRS laud the health care and retirement benefits as well as the camaraderie they have with their fellow IRSers. And hey, the Service is still more popular than Congress.

Remember, it's that special time of year to consider your options. Don't write off the idea. 

[Bloomberg, Earlier]

The post Reminder: Don’t Work at the IRS for Glamour, Good Cocktail Party Chatter appeared first on Going Concern.

Here's the description on Amazon:

The players move around the colorful board, landing on opportunities to earn income, spend money on non-deductible expenses and to purchase a variety of tax shelters. In addition, the players have have a chance to receive "annual reports" that determine whether the tax shelter investment made them rich or, as in most "real life" shelters, turn out to be a bust. Finally, an exposure to the horrors and humor of audit lurks with every roll of the dice. Drilling for oil in Hawaii, establishing a baseball team in Alaska, reviving an old motion picture, and building ski condos in Texas are just a few of the fun and exciting tax shelter opportunities that the player is offered in STICK THE IRS. Although humorous and in good taste, the game also offers certain educational benefits in highlighting the good and the bad in the use of shelters to reduce taxes. The player who manages to best use his income, his CPA and his shelters, and therefore who manages to pay the least tax, is the winner, having successfully been able to STICK THE IRS. * * * Sticking the IRS does not require pins or needles or knowledge of the Internal Revenue Code. It takes 2-6 adult "Taxplayers" who are willing to take a chance with a "Tax Shelter" that may give financial security or may backfire. After four tours around the board, the Taxplayer who has the most after-tax cash wins the game and has been successfully been able to STICK THE IRS * * * The cost of this game may be tax deductable – see your tax advisor!

Fun facts: The item model number is 1040 and it currently ranks #414,659 in Toys & Games which is a shame.

This is perfect for those times when you're putting in face time during busy season and you need to waste an hour or two or three. OR! OR! It'll be the most popular white elephant gift at your next holiday party.

This treasure can be all yours for $23.99. Pick it up wherever tax shelter games are sold.

[r/Accounting]

The post A Tax Shelter Board Game Is a Thing That Exists appeared first on Going Concern.

It's like driving a Model T that now has a great GPS system and wonderful sound system, [and] has a rebuilt engine," he said.

IRS says it's using technology from JFK's time [CNN Money]

The post The IRS Pimped Its Ride But Is Still Driving a Jalopy appeared first on Going Concern.

About half the people who call the IRS for assistance this filing season won't be able to get through to a person, Koskinen said. Once tax returns are filed, there will be fewer agents to audit them.

"Everybody's return will get processed," Koskinen told reporters. "But people have gotten very used to being able to file their return and quickly getting a refund. This year we may not have the resources, the people to provide refunds as quickly as we have in the past." [AP]

The post IRS Commish Is Still Bitching About Budget Cuts, Threatening a Terrible Filing Season Ahead appeared first on Going Concern.

Milennials (18-24) trust the IRS (73%) to enforce the law fairly more than people over 50 do (54-56%), says new IRS oversight board survey.

— Richard Rubin (@RichardRubinDC) December 8, 2014

What do we make of this?

The easy answer — like most of the crap we see pegging Millennials as driven by lofty goals and dreams, much like the olds were until life got in the way and shattered their unrealistic expectations — is that 18 – 24 year olds just haven't had enough experience with the IRS to be bitter yet. Give it time. Like a nice aged cheese.

The post Kids These Days Trust the IRS More Than Olds Do appeared first on Going Concern.

The IRS is offering up for auction a 2007 Chevrolet Corvette Z06 and a 2005 Chevrolet SSR Pickup, both painted in clean drug test piss yellow.

They've also got a 2006 Mercedes Benz CLS 55 AMG, a 27 foot boat, and a snazzy 2007 Chevrolet Silverado with nearly 200,000 miles on it.

If this isn't a friendly reminder to pay your taxes, I don't know what is.

The post Here’s Your Chance to Own a Yellow Corvette Thanks to the IRS appeared first on Going Concern.

Now, for folks like you and I, we'd know this guy is a clown and the whole thing is a scam. But not all Americans are so lucky to have functioning professional skepticism.

You'll recall these idiot IRS scammers even attempted to bilk money out of notorious felon and ex Crazy Eddie CFO Sam Antar. Our pal Sam was kind enough to record the call so we could all have a good laugh about it.

The IRS says over 1,000 people have lost more than $5,000 each to scams like this (you all do the math).

One Virginia Beach woman can't even believe she fell for the scam:

“This is the most embarrassing and humiliating thing that’s ever happened to me in my entire life,” she said about Wednesday’s call.

She’s so embarrassed and humiliated, she doesn’t want to be identified. But she does want people to hear how she lost $4,000 to a phone scam so they can protect themselves.

“People who hear this story may wonder, ‘How or why did you let this happen, how could you be so stupid?’” she said. “Trust me, I’ve asked myself that question so many times and I don’t have an answer.”

She still doesn’t understand why she got in the car, drove to the bank, withdrew $4,000 in cash, drove to the grocery store, bought these MoneyPaks, and read the codes to the caller, who immediately got her money.

“These men know how to get into your head,” she said. “He took all logical reasoning from me, he took my intelligence from me, he took my common sense from me.”

And $4,000, don't forget he took $4,000 from you.

A Charlotte minister who lost $16,500 to these clowns said the same thing:

“The natural question I raise about myself is how can you be so gullible and naive and let this happen?” Cadenhead said. “The reason is: This scam was so sophisticated and efficient and thorough, you’re in the middle of it before you realize what’s happening.”

Listening to the Sam Antar call, I'm not sure these guys are particularly sophisticated nor efficient but they do have Americans' natural fear of the IRS on their side.

The IRS has once again reminded gullible, naive taxpayers to ignore these idiots and don't give them any of your hard-earned money:

These callers may demand money or may say you have a refund due and try to trick you into sharing private information. These con artists can sound convincing when they call. They may know a lot about you, and they usually alter the caller ID to make it look like the IRS is calling. They use fake names and bogus IRS identification badge numbers. If you don’t answer, they often leave an “urgent” callback request.

“In recent weeks, we continue to see these telephone scams in every part of the country,” IRS Commissioner John Koskinen said. “We have formal processes in place for people with tax issues. The IRS respects taxpayer rights, and these angry, shake-down calls are clear warning signs of fraud. This is not how we do business. We urge people to be careful when they get these threatening phone calls.”

Here is a helpful video to send to your grandma so she can educate herself on these scams. Remember: only the IRS gets your personal information and your hard-earned money.

The post Somehow People Are Still Falling for Stupid IRS Scams appeared first on Going Concern.

They didn't really make that the core of their argument against a voluntary tax preparer program, of course, but it was strongly hinted to:

The American Institute of CPAs (AICPA) has expressed strong concern that the Internal Revenue Service’s (IRS) proposed voluntary certification program for tax return preparers “would cause significant legal problems that may ultimately frustrate the IRS’s goals, confuse the public, and lead to litigation.”

Lead to litigation it did. When the IRS continued with its plan despite strong opposition from the AICPA, the AICPA sued them:

By implementing a purportedly “voluntary” program that is mandatory in effect, the rule is an end-run around Loving v. IRS, a federal court ruling which struck down the IRS’s earlier attempt to regulate tax return preparers. The IRS simply does not have the authority to proceed with the new rule. By doubling the number of categories of tax return preparers to eight, the rule will also confuse consumers. Worse yet, the new rule will do nothing to address the problem of unethical or fraudulent tax return preparers – which should be a top priority.

As a result, the AICPA has filed suit in federal court to prevent the IRS from moving ahead with this unjustified and unlawful program.

It's the "confuse consumers" that got the suit thrown out in court this week.

According to Accounting Today:

In his ruling Monday, Boasberg said the AICPA lacked standing and would not be harmed by a voluntary program. “Arguing that AICPA and its members have suffered no harm from the program, Defendants IRS and the IRS Commissioner have now moved to dismiss the suit for lack of standing. Agreeing, the Court will grant Defendants’ Motion,” wrote Boasberg.

He disagreed with the AICPA’s contention that customers would use unenrolled tax preparers who participated in the Annual Filing Season Program instead of CPAs, noting, “CPAs already operate in a competitive market in which several different types of qualified preparers have carved out individualized niches. AICPA has not demonstrated that permitting unenrolled preparers to distinguish themselves vis-à-vis other unenrolled preparers will result in competitive injury to CPAs and accounting firms who compete on the basis of more rigorous credentials.”

Ouch. The AICPA isn't used to lacking standing, that one has to burn a little.

The AICPA told AT "we are surprised and disappointed by the ruling." They aren't sure if they will continue this fight or simply move on with their lives. We will, of course, keep you posted.

The post Judge: AICPA Was a Little Melodramatic About IRS’s Voluntary Registration Program appeared first on Going Concern.

In the letter, Camp stated, “Some of the key questions remaining in the investigation into the IRS’ targeting of conservatives groups are: who at the White House knew what was going on; when did they know it; and, what action did they take upon learning about it? Your office is now refusing to make available until after the election the very person that could unlock that mystery. This is completely unacceptable, especially for an Administration that once pledged to be the most open and transparent ever.” [House Ways and Means Committee]

The post Treasury Department Tells House Committee to Bug Off Until After Election Day appeared first on Going Concern.

Perhaps unbeknownst to her, former IRS official Lois Lerner will be making her film debut on Oct. 14 in a documentary where she’s one of the villains.

The film is called Unfair: Exposing the IRS, and it will screen in 674 theaters nationwide, though for one night only, courtesy of Fathom Events, a company that brings sports, concerts, speeches and other alternative entertainment to movie screens.

Checking out the trailer, you can see where this is going. I'm not going to imply it's completely one-sided or anything, but let's just say Mike Huckabee is about as non-partisan as Grover Norquist.

The promo page for the event describes the film as a "tour" of alleged IRS abuses:

Written and produced by nationally syndicated Craig Bergman, UnFair: Exposing the IRS takes audiences on a tour across the country to explore the alleged cover-ups and abuses of power at the Internal Revenue Service and features interviews with politicians, community organizers, and the victims at the heart of the IRS' debate.

This one-night event will not only allow you to hear from the experts, but give you the chance to sit in on a panel discussion, hosted by former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee, where you will learn more about this movement and how you can motivate your community to take action.

You can find a theater near you showing the film tomorrow night at 7pm here. Because you didn't have anything better to do on a Tuesday night anyway, did you?

The post Someone Made a Documentary About Lois Lerner And You Can Watch It Tomorrow* appeared first on Going Concern.

He and some lady who’s not nearly as interesting are demanding that the IRS refund all PTIN fees collected in the past and never collect PTIN fees in the future, or “at the very least, the plaintiffs want the IRS to lower the fee to about $13.”

He’s the William Fucking Wallace of tax preparers. “You can make us E-file, you can make us fill out an EITC checklist, but you can never make us pay more the actual cost you incur from a third-party vendor for administering the PTIN registration process!!! 'MURICA!"

Not only is it questionable as to whether or not the IRS even has the authority to charge the PTIN registration fee, your sixty-three bucks was also supposed to cover the cost of “the registration cards and certificates that the IRS was supposed to provide to preparers.” But you, me, and Adam Steele never got our goddamn cards. How the hell are we supposed to get our discount at Big Tim’s Tax Supply Warehouse without the fucking card?!

Plus there are no realistic options for recouping the $63. No one wants to raise their billing rates by 3.5¢ per hour, nor do they want to eat at Cheesecake Factory one less time per year.

As Adam Steele leads the charge against the PTIN, I only hope he doesn’t trip over his giant balls. Giant balls of Steele. This BMF has big enough balls to give his firm the name “Very Expensive Tax Service” and to run an ad campaign that included the follow FAQs:

Q: What is Very Expensive Tax Service?
A: It is a tax service that is very expensive.

Q: How expensive is Very Expensive Tax Service:
A: Very

Q: Can I smoke when I am receiving Very Expensive Tax Service?
A: Yes. Anyone who is paying that much has a right to be comfortable, in hospitable surroundings. Besides, we kind of like it when people smoke in our office.

Q: Is Very Expensive Tax Service fast?
A: No. It is slow and painstaking.

Mr. Steele also ran for Congress in 2012 as a Tea Party candidate. His bio says he’s a “frequent political candidate”¹, a fiscal conservative, and a strong supporter of the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights.” I’d vote for him because apparently the alternative is a fiscally irresponsible hater of America and/or freedom.

I can’t wait to see the IRS gets its ass handed to it by this straight shooting, second-hand smoke loving, big government hating, estranged father of the sons of Mumford and Sons.

¹Read “perennial loser”

The post Adam Steele is Going to Pry Your $63 PTIN Fee Out Of the IRS’s Cold Dead Hands appeared first on Going Concern.

[Scientist Mathew] Zuckerman's tax-avoidance schemes included naming his dog and cat as directors of a company called "Hyperpanel University," a Nevada business, which was listed as the owner of a $1.2 million Woody Creek home near Aspen. The home was actually owned by Mathew and Sandra Zuckerman. Another shell business owned the deed of their $1.8 million Tuluca Lake, Calif., mansion.

"This is an extremely serious offense. … There is a deviousness to all of that as well," Blackburn said. "Dr. Zuckerman is one lucky man that he was only charged with one offense."

The judge told Sandra Zuckerman that although her husband was mostly to blame, "you are not entirely an innocent spouse."

Forget the wife, are the dog and cat eligible for innocent pet relief?

Zuckerman will pay the IRS $693,706 in restitution and do two years in prison. The dog and cat were not available for comment.

The post Mad Scientist Gets Prison Time for Using His Dog and Cat in a Tax Avoidance Scheme appeared first on Going Concern.

As you come back from the anesthesia, you ask how it went. Am I OK? Am I all fixed up?

Your surgeon gives you a smile and assures you everything is just fine. "Actually, you didn't need surgery," he says. "I needed the practice."

Now imagine the surgeon is the IRS and the unneeded procedure is an audit. That's exactly what one Columbia Law professor claims happened to him when the IRS decided to audit his pathetic, all cash charitible contributions.

Inspired by the IRS' closer look at Breitbart News, the professor writes:

It began with a notice that I was being audited for my charitable contributions. This was puzzling as my contributions were entirely in cash. To be sure, I was ashamed that they were pitifully low that year, but this made the audit all the more curious.

Dutifully, I trekked up from the South Side to the federal building in downtown Chicago, and my accountant came in from out of state! Yes, I pay an accountant for my small scale taxes, but read on, and see why he is worth every penny.

So far so good. Having your accountant as wingman at an IRS office is never a bad idea if you can afford the guy's billable time.

Apparently, the person who was working on the audit wasn't there that day, so this guy and his accountant waited for another guy.

Into the little office we crowded: the IRS guy behind the desk, and we in chairs opposite him. He asked some perfunctory questions and then turned to my charitable contributions. He looked at my embarrassingly low contributions, he examined my proof of having made them, and then seemed to weigh some profound question of tax law. The moment of truth had arrived.

At this point, however, I could not help myself. Being a former tax lawyer, but now being merely a client, I foolishly asked the idiotically simple question that had been bugging me all along: “Why am I being audited for cash contributions?”

The IRS man looked at us. Then, calmly and without discomfort, said, “It is a practice audit.”

Oh, you thought you were actually being audited? PSYCH!

I think most taxpayers would rather undergo practice brain surgery than practice IRS audits, but maybe that's just me.

The post Columbia Law Professor on That Time He Was Audited by the IRS Just For Practice appeared first on Going Concern.

The post Quote of The Day: The IRS Follows the Law, When They Can appeared first on Going Concern.

The American Institute of CPAs (AICPA) today issued the statement below by AICPA President and CEO Barry C. Melancon, CPA, CGMA, regarding the filing of a federal lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.  The lawsuit challenges the Internal Revenue Service’s (IRS’s) new rule regulating tax return preparers.

“The AICPA has been a steadfast supporter of the IRS’s overall goals of enhancing compliance by tax return preparers and elevating ethical conduct. However, the IRS’s new rule regulating tax return preparers is an unlawful exercise of government power.

By implementing a purportedly “voluntary” program that is mandatory in effect, the rule is an end-run around Loving v. IRS, a federal court ruling which struck down the IRS’s earlier attempt to regulate tax return preparers. The IRS simply does not have the authority to proceed with the new rule. By doubling the number of categories of tax return preparers to eight, the rule will also confuse consumers. Worse yet, the new rule will do nothing to address the problem of unethical or fraudulent tax return preparers – which should be a top priority.

As a result, the AICPA has filed suit in federal court to prevent the IRS from moving ahead with this unjustified and unlawful program.

The IRS should withdraw the new rule, consult with stakeholders, and use the tools and data already at its disposal to monitor unethical tax return preparers. At a minimum, the IRS must conduct a legitimate notice-and-comment rulemaking before proceeding.”

One big issue the AICPA has with the program is that it is "purportedly" voluntary (their word, not ours), when in fact it is more like strongly suggested if not required:

[T]he new rule is de facto mandatory because it creates a strong competitive incentive for unenrolled tax return preparers to comply. Indeed, Commissioner Koskinen and the IRS have admitted as much. Commissioner Koskinen stated that the Record of Completion and place in the Directory of Federal Tax Return Preparers will enable those who successfully complete the program “to stand out from the competition by giving them a recognizable record of completion that they can show to their clients.”

You can read the AICPA's gripe as filed in U.S. District Court here:

AICPA v IRS

The post The AICPA Just Sued the IRS Over “Purported” Voluntary Tax Preparer Program appeared first on Going Concern.

In its latest attempt to fight tax refund fraud, the IRS said that, beginning in January 2015, it will impose a limit of three electronic direct deposits of tax refunds into a single financial account or prepaid debit card. Taxpayers who exceed the limit will receive the fourth and subsequent refunds in a paper check instead of a direct deposit.

Taxpayers who request more than three direct deposits to one account will receive a notice of the change, be told they can expect a refund check in about four weeks, and be able to track the status of the refund on the IRS’s “Where’s My Refund?” site.

The new limit is intended to prevent criminals from easily obtaining multiple refunds. It is also intended to stop tax return preparers from obtaining payment for their tax return preparation services by depositing all or part of a taxpayer’s refund into the preparer’s own bank account.

We read no less than 1 story a week about some podunk tax preparer who ran a refund scam, <sarcasm>no word on whether voluntary tax preparer registration could cut down on this</sarcasm> but I guess this will do for the interim.

The post IRS To Crack Down on Idiots Who Misuse Refund Direct Deposit appeared first on Going Concern.

WASHINGTON —  The Internal Revenue Service announced today that guidance will soon be issued outlining a new voluntary program designed to encourage education and filing season readiness for paid tax return preparers. The program will be in place to help taxpayers during the 2015 filing season.

The Annual Filing Season Program will allow unenrolled return preparers to obtain a record of completion when they voluntarily complete a required amount of continuing education (CE), including a course in basic tax filing issues and updates, ethics, and other federal tax law courses.

"This voluntary program will be a step to help protect taxpayers during the 2015 filing season,” said IRS Commissioner John Koskinen. “About 60 percent of tax return preparers operate without any type of oversight or education requirements. Our program will give unenrolled return preparers a way to stay to up-to-date on tax laws and changes, which we believe will improve service to taxpayers.”

Clearly the IRS is not afraid of strongly-worded letters from the AICPA.
 

The post IRS Goes Ahead With Voluntary Tax Preparer Program Despite AICPA Objection appeared first on Going Concern.

The AICPA is back with an even more strongly-worded letter, this time threatening serious retribution if this issue isn't dropped and soon. "Therefore, we feel compelled to consider our next steps, and to raise more formally our legal and policy concerns with the IRS’s current path," wrote AICPA Chairman Bill Balhoff and President/CEO Barry Melancon. Read: don't make us whack you.

The full press release below:

Washington, D.C. (June 24, 2014) – The American Institute of CPAs (AICPA) has expressed strong concern that the Internal Revenue Service’s (IRS) proposed voluntary certification program for tax return preparers “would cause significant legal problems that may ultimately frustrate the IRS’s goals, confuse the public, and lead to litigation.”

In a letter to IRS Commissioner John Koskinen, AICPA Chairman of the Board of Directors William E. (Bill) Balhoff, CPA, CGMA, CFF and President and CEO Barry C. Melancon, CPA, CGMA wrote, “We have repeatedly expressed to you and your colleagues that our members have very significant concerns regarding a voluntary certification program and urged the IRS to have a formal comment period to obtain and consider the public’s views prior to moving forward. … However, it is our understanding that the IRS has no intention of slowing down or considering viable alternatives. Therefore, we feel compelled to consider our next steps, and to raise more formally our legal and policy concerns with the IRS’s current path.” Under the proposed voluntary program, tax return preparers would receive an IRS certificate for display in return for completing a continuing education program that includes a comprehension assessment.

The AICPA’s letter emphasizes the following points:
•       First, no statute authorizes the proposed program;
•       Second, the program will inevitably be viewed as an end-run around Loving v. IRS, (a federal court ruling rejecting an earlier IRS attempt to regulate tax return preparers);
•       Third, the IRS has evidently concluded, in developing the proposed program, that it need not comply with the notice and comment requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act. This is incorrect; and
•       Finally, the current proposal is arbitrary and capricious because it fails to address the problems presented by unethical tax return preparers, runs counter to evidence presented to the IRS, and will create market confusion.

Describing the proposed program as “unlawful and improper,” the June 24 letter stated that it is essential that any regulatory approach instituted by the IRS to address this issue has a firm legal basis and reflects sound policy. “We continue to believe that additional regulation of tax return preparers might yield significant benefits and that the IRS can achieve these objectives while remaining consistent with Loving and other statutory limitations on the IRS’s authority,” the letter stated.

“We have sought to work with the IRS to achieve workable solutions to regulate tax return preparers and protect the public, and we stand ready to continue these efforts,” the AICPA wrote.

Basically, the AICPA wants to make sure the IRS isn't stepping on their toes here. Regulating tax preparers, protecting the public, offering CPE — COME ON GUYS.

The AICPA writes:

First, no statute authorizes the proposed program. The IRS’s general authority to administer the tax code under 26 U.S.C. § 7803 does not provide an adequate basis to proceed. Because federal agencies may act only pursuant to a valid delegation of authority by Congress, the IRS may not implement the proposed program. This fatal flaw cannot be overcome by the IRS. That no statutory provision expressly prohibits such a program does not legitimize an otherwise illegitimate act.

The 14 page letter offers numerous other reasons why the IRS cannot proceed with this plan.

Consider yourselves warned, IRS.

The post AICPA Ready to Go On a Jihad Against the IRS If This Voluntary Tax Preparer Nonsense Continues appeared first on Going Concern.

Koskinen said IRS hasn't been able to upgrade yet to Windows 7 because of funding.

— Accounting Today (@AccountingToday) June 20, 2014

According to Engadget, over half of IRS computers are still running Windows XP, and the plan is to upgrade to Windows 7 (which, as we all know, isn't even the most current Microsoft OS but even the IRS knows Windows 8 sucks) by the end of this year:

Usually, the Internal Revenue Service is the one getting paid this time of year, but Uncle Sam will be lining someone else's pockets this tax season because of its attachment to Windows XP. In case you hadn't heard, support for XP officially stopped on April 8th, meaning that Microsoft will no longer provide support or security updates for the venerable OS. However, governmental computers can't be left vulnerable, so the IRS will be paying Microsoft millions of dollars for custom support to keep their machines secure and functional. Right now, over half the agency's PCs still run XP, despite Microsoft telling the whole world that it would stop support for the OS in 2014 six years ago.

Computerworld estimated that the IRS would pay $11.6 million for one year of custom support, however the IRS disputes that and claims they will pay less than $500,000, which works out to about $9 for each of its 58,000 XP computers. The migration to Windows 7 is estimated to cost the IRS $30 million.

We feel like this would be an appropriate place to leave this 1960s Treasury-produced film that was intended to assure technologically-paranoid Americans that computers and the IRS go together like 4th of July and hot dogs. Perhaps they should take their own advice and not be so afraid of the future.

The post IRS Can’t Afford to Upgrade to Windows 7 But Can Afford to Pay Microsoft to Use XP appeared first on Going Concern.

According to a story published on TaxAnalysts.com, the IRS Office of Professional Responsibility will send letters asking practitioners to stop using Circular 230 disclaimers saying the disclaimer is required. Many practitioners continue to use the Circular 230 disclaimer in their emails even though the IRS finalized regulations that remove the covered opinion rules, IRS Office of Professional Responsibility Director Karen Hawkins said on a Tax Talk Today webcast.

The Circular 230 disclaimer is so pervasive I even have press releases sent from accounting firm PR departments with it at the bottom. Gee, thank you for reminding me that I shouldn't rely on a press release about your new office in Des Moines to avoid IRS penalties.

Basically, the IRS found that slapping the disclaimer on the bottom of emails didn't actually achieve anything useful, and they estimate the rule change will save tax practitioners a minimum of $5,333,200:

Former §10.35 provided detailed rules for tax opinions that were “covered opinions” under Circular 230. As discussed in the notice of proposed rulemaking, Treasury and the IRS revisited the covered opinion rules because their application increased the burden on practitioners and clients, without necessarily increasing the quality of the tax advice that the client received.

Commenters on the proposed regulations overwhelmingly supported the elimination of former §10.35 because the former rules were burdensome and provided minimal benefit to taxpayers. Commenters agreed that the rules in former §10.35 contributed to overuse, as well as misleading use, of disclaimers on most practitioner communications even when those communications did not constitute tax advice.

So, expect a nice note from your pals at the IRS to nuke your little disclaimer.

The post The IRS Reminds You To Kindly Remove That Annoying Circular 230 Disclaimer From Your Emails appeared first on Going Concern.

Maybe this excuse would seem plausible in 1995 but now that your phone has more storage capacity than the computer you owned 15 years ago, it seems a bit ridiculous of the IRS to use a space-saving process for emails that basically makes them disappear after a short period of time:

Prior to the eruption of the IRS controversy last spring, the IRS had a policy of backing up the data on its email server (which runs Microsoft Outlook) every day. It kept a backup of the records for six months on digital tape, according to a letter sent from the IRS to Sens. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and Orrin Hatch (R-Utah). After six months, the IRS would reuse those tapes for newer backups. So when Congressional committees began requesting emails from the agency, its records only went back to late 2012.

IRS Commish John Koskinen initially told a congressional firing squad that the emails were stored in agency archives but that turned out to be incorrect. Give him a break; he's the commissioner, not Nick Burns the IRS' Computer Guy.

In her Bloomberg View column today, Megan McArdle writes that while the missing emails are "plausible," the story is also "moronic."

Is this plausible? Unfortunately, yes. I have worked for organizations that used these sorts of restrictions on hard drive space.

However, it’s also moronic IT policy. Hard drive space has been dirt cheap for more than a decade. The IRS's policies on e-mail storage were primitive even by the standards of 15 years ago, when I was working as a technology consultant. At that time, it was bog standard policy at every office I worked at, including small businesses, to regularly pull a set of backup tapes out of rotation — once a week at financial firms, once a month at smaller businesses with less regulatory overhead, once every three months for the truly cash-strapped — and stash it in a vault in case you needed to recover something later. It should not have been possible for the IRS to lose more than a few days — at most a few weeks — of Lois Lerner’s e-mail. Unfortunately, the IRS only started storing its backup tapes last year, long after the scandal broke.

Also at issue, at least according to House Ways and Means Chairman Dave Camp, is that the IRS didn't ring him up and say "hey Dave, problem. Those emails? We kind of can't find them."

Camp notes that the IRS decided to "bury" the claim of lost emails "deep in an unrelated letter on a Friday afternoon." He isn't kidding. It appears on the 15th page of the document, which is actually the seventh page of the first attachment to an eight-page letter, addressed to Sens. Ron Wyden of Oregon and Orrin Hatch of Utah, respectively chairman and ranking Republican of the Senate Finance Committee.

What I want to know is… how is it possible to recover kiddie porn from some pervert's intentionally ruined hard drive but the IRS can't find these Lerner emails?

McArdle continues:

In short, yes, there is an innocent explanation: An accident combined with a really bad e-mail storage policy to wipe out critical records. There’s also a semi-innocent explanation, where really bad storage policy could have enabled Lerner to arrange a hard drive accident that destroyed incriminating e-mails before she had to respond to Camp’s initial letter. I find the innocent explanation much more plausible than a conspiracy, or even the semi-innocent explanation — even assuming that she was conspiring with the White House, why bother with the elaborate schemes when you could just send your incriminating e-mails from an outside account?

But that still leaves me really concerned about the terrible policy decisions. The timing of the data loss is incredibly suspicious, and the IRS has left itself completely unable to answer those suspicions with anything better than a shrug. It should expect — in fact, it should request — a thorough outside investigation of this incident, but even the most scrupulous audit will not be able to entirely quell the worry that the IRS enabled a rogue agent to get away with destroying evidence.

Surely the IRS didn't anticipate any of this would matter or they would have gotten with the times years ago. Now they've got every foamy-mouthed right wing blowhard crying conspiracy all because of an extremely outdated email policy. Good work, guys.

The post Latest Twist in the IRS Scandal Reveals The IRS Had an Awful Email Policy appeared first on Going Concern.

The most recent version is pretty cut and dry:

1. The Right to Be Informed
2. The Right to Quality Service
3. The Right to Pay No More than the Correct Amount of Tax
4. The Right to Challenge the IRS’s Position and Be Heard
5. The Right to Appeal an IRS Decision in an Independent Forum
6. The Right to Finality
7. The Right to Privacy
8. The Right to Confidentiality
9. The Right to Retain Representation
10. The Right to a Fair and Just Tax System

Previously, the IRS called a similar document a "declaration of rights," which was first published in 1996 and updated in 1998, 2000, 2005, and 2012.

One item found on the declaration is noticeably absent from the new Taxpayer Bill of Rights, and that would be this bit (from the most recent version):

VIII. Relief From Certain Penalties The IRS will waive penalties when allowed by law if you can show you acted reasonably and in good faith or relied on the incorrect advice of an IRS employee. We will waive interest that is the result of certain errors or delays caused by an IRS employee.

There is zero mention in the latest document about IRS employees handing out crappy advice, nor is there any suggestion that the IRS will waive penalties if you meant well and ask nicely. You do have the right to challenge the IRS, so there's that.

You'll note none of the items on the Bill of Rights are new as they already existed in the tax code but what sane taxpayer who isn't also a tax person reads the code?

"The Taxpayer Bill of Rights contains fundamental information to help taxpayers," said IRS Commissioner John A. Koskinen. "These are core concepts about which taxpayers should be aware. Respecting taxpayer rights continues to be a top priority for IRS employees, and the new Taxpayer Bill of Rights summarizes these important protections in a clearer, more understandable format than ever before."

The post The IRS Quietly Tweaked Your Rights as a Taxpayer appeared first on Going Concern.

Thiago Sorrentino was kind enough to let me know that the Supreme Court of Brazil (the Supremo Tribunal Federal) has cited my daily roundup on the IRS Scandal in Medida Cautelar NA Susepnsao De Tutela Antecipada (STA/752)

389 days of scandal? It seems like just yesterday we were on Day 388!

The post Now on Day 389, the IRS Scandal Has Reached the Supreme Court of Brazil appeared first on Going Concern.

Inspectors ordered the Internal Revenue Service snack bar temporally [sic] closed Wednesday for pests and no hot water violations according to District of Columbia health inspection records.

The snack bar is located in the agency's headquarters building at 1111 Connecticut Ave. NW.

Health inspectors cited the IRS snack bar for eight violations, including "several rodent droppings observed on floor and equipment" and hot water recorded at 88 degrees instead of the required District minimum of 110 degrees.

Oh come on! That entire city is crawling with pests and vermin, what's the big deal?

The post DC Health Inspectors Found Rats at the Connecticut Avenue IRS Office appeared first on Going Concern.

The post IRS Throws Hissy Fit About Not Being Able to Regulate Preparers, Gives Up On Everything appeared first on Going Concern.

From the AICPA:

The American Institute of CPAs (AICPA) expressed its opposition today to a voluntary tax return preparer regulation program that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is planning in a letter to IRS Commissioner John Koskinen. The IRS was blocked from implementing a mandatory regulation program by court decisions in Loving v. IRS.

The AICPA has “deep concerns with regard to a voluntary system, and the speed with which the IRS is moving to implement such a system,” AICPA President and CEO Barry C. Melancon, CPA, CGMA and Jeffrey A. Porter, CPA, chair of the AICPA Tax Executive Committee, wrote. “We believe a voluntary program would create confusion regarding the relative proficiencies of the various types of preparers. In addition, the proposed voluntary system would undoubtedly leave the impression among most taxpayers that certain tax return preparers are endorsed by the Internal Revenue Service.”

Melancon and Porter called into question the proposal’s likely effectiveness. “As a practical matter, any voluntary regime constructed would still not address the problems with unethical and fraudulent tax return preparers.”

They also criticized the process the IRS is using and how quickly it is proceeding. “We are concerned that the IRS is rapidly moving forward without widely disseminating the proposal or seeking public comments.”

Our own Greg Kyte had some thoughts on the AICPA's opposition, we'll just leave those here:

The AICPA opposes IRS voluntary tax preparer certification because Barry Melacon, CPA, CGMA, ABV, CITP, CFF hates voluntary certifications.

— Greg Kyte, CPA (@gregkyte) May 20, 2014

In case you are just dying to read this strongly-worded opposition letter to IRS Commish John Koskinen, it's your lucky day!

Voluntary Certification Letter to Koskinen

The post The AICPA Voiced “Deep Concerns” About the IRS’ Voluntary Tax Preparer Proposal appeared first on Going Concern.

The agency had until May 12 to file a petition with the US Supreme Court to appeal two lower courts' rulings that it could not regulate the 600,000 to 700,000 paid tax preparers in the United States. According to the Institute for Justice, the IRS let the deadline expire. [AccountingWEB]

The post The IRS Has Given Up Its Fight to Regulate Tax Preparers appeared first on Going Concern.

Lerner’s attorney, William Taylor, said Wednesday that the referral is “just another attempt by Republicans to vilify Ms. Lerner for political gain,” noting that the Justice Department is already investigating the IRS targeting matter. ‎

“Ms. Lerner has done nothing wrong,” Taylor said. “She did not violate any law or regulation. She did not ‎mislead Congress. She did not interfere with the rights of any organization to a tax exemption. ‎Those are the facts.”‎ [Federal Eye via WaPo]

The post House Republicans Still Keeping Themselves Busy Trying to Ruin Lois Lerner’s Day appeared first on Going Concern.

POLITICO got to pick his brain recently and while he refused to answer any questions about that Lois Lerner chick and how Ways and Means is in his business like white on rice, he did have some thoughts on how Obamacare is quickly becoming the best thing to happen to the IRS since the 16th Amendment:

But there was one area that Werfel said the IRS deserves praise for: Obamacare. The agency has so far avoided any real criticism for the rollout of the 2010 health care law — a status Werfel credited to its technology prep. “Information technology, at this point in time, is a significant strength for the IRS. The chief technology officer over there [has] a shop that is top-notch, I was extremely impressed with what the technology folks over at the IRS are able to accomplish. The launch of the IT solutions went very smoothly, it was not without hard work. The final months leading up to October…what I saw was a very effective technology team,” he said.

So let me make sure I read that correctly. We are in the very early stages of Obamacare's rollout and the guy who ran the show at the IRS for 7 months while the IRS was embroiled in a political scandal thinks Obamacare is one of the IRS' greatest victories?

Cool story, bro.

The post The IRS Has 99 Problems But Obamacare Ain’t One appeared first on Going Concern.

From BBW:

The IRS is contacting the current and former employees involved, almost all of whom worked in Pennsylvania, Delaware and New Jersey. The information dates to 2007, before the IRS started using automatic encryption.

IRS officials were told of the breach “a few days ago,” Koskinen’s message said.

The Social Security numbers, names and addresses of employees and contract workers were potentially accessible online because the thumb drive was plugged into the employee’s “unsecure home network,” Koskinen’s message said.

It is unknown at this time whether or not the employee is still employed by the IRS but Koskinen assured employees in his message today that they are totally taking this seriously, guys, so it's cool.

The post Someone at the IRS Accidentally Brought Home Unsecured Data on 20,000 Fellow Employees appeared first on Going Concern.

Richard Rubin points out this morning that the topic at hand — Guidance for Tax-Exempt Social Welfare Organizations on Candidate-Related Political Activities (REG-134417-13) — is generating quite the vocal buzz.

This should come as no surprise since the uninformed masses have been groomed to think this is a free speech issue. Also, Obama.

Case in point:

These regulations are nothing but an attempt to legalize the harassment of conservative, Christian, and Tea Party groups by the Obama administration. No one has been held accountable for the blatant targeting of conservatives by the IRS. Lois Lerner took the Fifth Amendment, was placed on "paid" leave, and allowed to retire with full pension and benefits. The proposed regulations simply codify this targeting, and therefore should be withdrawn.

and:

I am steadfastly against the proposed regulations that directly violate the First Amendment of the Constitution which ensures the federal government shall not infringe on our Freedom of Speech.

These regulations would strip citizens’ right to send organized communication within weeks of an election and prohibit identifying a candidate or political party who supports Obama’s pro-forced unionism agenda.

I urge the Federal Government to drop Regulation IR-2013-92 and its unconstitutional restrictions on citizen organizations, and to cease using tax laws to suppress political speech.

The funny part about that last one was the fact that the defender of the Constitution didn't care to sign his or her name to the comment and remained anonymous just like our founding fathers would have wanted.

76,186 comments and counting. Anyone else going to weigh in?

The post People are Getting a Little Worked Up Over Proposed IRS Non-Profit Guidance appeared first on Going Concern.

In 2008, when I was about to graduate with my B.S. in accounting, I attended the job fair at Utah Valley State College. No CPA firms were there because we didn't have a graduate program and nobody was even close to their 150 hours.

But the IRS was there.

The guy at their booth looked like the kid who wrote the letter to the principal explaining his seven well-researched reasons why rope climbing in gym class was was counterproductive.

I asked him what he liked best about working for the IRS. He said he liked finding people who owned a new Cadillac, a new Lexus and a ski boat, but had no taxable income. Basically he liked being nosy to prove that he's smarter than people who don't work for the IRS.

What he should have said is, "They give me a gun, and sometimes I get to shoot people who are bad at math." Then the accounting undergrads would be lining up.

And you know, when you give a mathlete a gun, he's going to think up some pretty badass catch phrases to say when he pops a cap in a tax evader's ass. Things like, "Itemize that, bitch!" and "How's that estate plan coming, bitch?!" and "Looks like somebody's heirs just received a step up in basis on their parents' capital assets that have appreciated over time, bitch!"

TIGTA recently said

The Internal Revenue Service’s Criminal Investigation Division needs to make sure its special agents are taking and passing required firearms training. … Special agents must pass tests, including firing a handgun, entering a building with a firearm, and firing a weapon while wearing a bulletproof vest.

However, anyone who's watched Tommy Boy knows the proper way to enter a building with a firearm is by saying, "Everybody, this’ll only take a second."

TIGTA also found that firearm discharge incidents were not always properly reported.

That’s becoming a bigger and bigger problem because firearm discharge incidents increase proportionally to on-duty gun twirling, and on-duty gun twirling increases when IRS agents choose "I'm your huckleberry" as their post-tax-evader-ass-cap-popping catch phrase.

I contacted my friend Kem Washington. She’s a CPA, a professor at Dillard University, and former gunslinger for the IRS. She said:

As a criminal investigator, I was required to carry a gun. I believe it was a Glock 45. … I learned how to shoot various firearms.

I didn’t ask for clarification because I’d like to assume “various firearms” includes a sawed-off shotgun, a 50-caliber rifle mounted to the roof of a car², and one uzi in each hand.

I asked if she had ever popped a cap in a tax evader’s ass.

No, I never popped anyone! But really, not many CIs [criminal investigation agents] discharge their weapons (or ever will). Keep in mind, when IRS agents are required to do a search warrant or other activity, they are accompanied by other law enforcement agents, which usually enter prior to CI agents.

Sounds like, if you get hired by the IRS, not only does your boss require that you carry a Glock, you get to command a battalion of armed mercenaries.

So the next time you advise a client to take an aggressive tax position, you’ve got to ask yourself a question: “Do I feel lucky?” Well, do you, punk?³

¹ No one thought I meant huge biceps.

² Probably a Kia.

³ A movie reference from 1971 is an ineffective way to end a post whose target audience is primarily millennials.

The post IRS Agents Pack Heat, Rarely Discharge appeared first on Going Concern.

To Nichelle Perez, the $20,000 she received for donating her eggs for fertility treatments was a tax-exempt payment for pain and suffering.

Not so, said the U.S. Internal Revenue Service, which considers it income.

The California woman and the government are arguing over whether egg donation is an act of commerce that should be taxed. A U.S. Tax Court judge will determine the outcome in what is seen as a precedent-setting case that could provide certainty for people who donate eggs, sperm and blood plasma.

Perez did not report the "income," nor does she consider it such. The IRS disagrees, and thinks she owes $4,998 in taxes plus interest.

“This is in no way considered self-employment since I did not sell a product or service," she said in a court filing. "I feel like I am being penalized for doing something good for another person.”

FYI kiddo, doing something good for another person generally does not involve receiving a payment of $20,000.

The interesting part of this case — strange justifications aside — is the idea that the sale of her eggs could actually be treated as long-term capital gains since she had the eggs for, like, ever and profited off their sale.

How exactly does one book that?

The post Actually, the IRS Wants You to Pay Taxes on Any Bodily Fluids or Future Children You Sell appeared first on Going Concern.

McKnight has filed a lawsuit against Vernon Brown and Company, claiming Brown ruined his life by not paying ANY of Brian's taxes for close to a decade … resulting not only in more than a million bucks in back taxes, but more than $500K in penalties and interest.

Here's how bad McKnight says it got … In the lawsuit he claims Brown knew he screwed up and secretly contacted Congressman Henry Waxman and gave him a phony sob story that got Waxman to contact the IRS and get McKnight back on an installment plan.

First, if your accountant can't reach the IRS and has to go straight to Capitol Hill, you know you have a problem.

However, one has to wonder how exactly a millionaire manages to dodge paying taxes for a full decade without having any idea taxes are owed. The IRS isn't exactly subtle when they feel they've been stiffed, surely they, I dunno, sent a letter or something? Was the mailman in on it too, bro?

Does no one recall the seedy tale of one Kenneth Starr? Not the hater who tried to ruin Bill Clinton's life, the celebrity financial adviser and stripper connoisseur who was eventually picked up for running a massive $30 million fraud on his wealthy clients.

Before another multi-millionaire finds themselves in this situation (unless it's Justin Bieber, I hope that guy ends up so destitute he's doing sexual favors for truckers behind a dumpster in Toronto), remember you're never too busy or famous or special to get ripped off. If you trust a single individual or firm with your entire well-being, then maybe you deserve to find what remains of your assets frozen by the IRS.

I mean 10 years, really? Really?! Come on, man.

The post A Friendly Notice for Celebrities: Your Accountant Is Not Your Mother appeared first on Going Concern.

[T]he Ways & Means Committee went ahead today and approved H.R. 3865, the STOP Targeting of Political Beliefs by the IRS Act.  As its title suggests, this legislation will stop the IRS in its rush to implement these rules.  This allows Congress to continue its investigations, which have yet to benefit from the full universe of IRS documents.   

As Speaker Boehner has said, “The American people deserve answers, and we will continue to fight to get the truth – no matter how badly the Administration wants to sweep these issues under the carpet.”

I have a serious question: wouldn't it just be easier to eliminate 510(c)(4) status for political groups completely? Seems a fair resolution, then everyone wins.

In 2012, Americans for Tax Reform spent $15 million on political ads. Or how about the deliciously ironically named Americans for Prosperity spending $36,352,928 that same election cycle? How is that "social welfare" and not straight up buying elections?

The "real" IRS scandal isn't alleged targeting of conservative groups, it's the IRS' muddy definition of 501(c)(4):

Types of Organizations Exempt under Section 501(c)(4)

Internal Revenue Code section 501(c)(4) provides for the exemption of two very different types of organizations with their own distinct qualification requirements. They are:

• Social welfare organizations: Civic leagues or organizations not organized for profit but operated exclusively for the promotion of social welfare, and
• Local associations of employees, the membership of which is limited to the employees of designated person(s) in a particular municipality, and the net earnings of which are devoted exclusively for the promotion of social welfare.

Homeowners associations and volunteer fire companies may be recognized as exempt as social welfare organizations if they meet the requirements for exemption. Organizations that engage in substantial lobbying activities sometimes also are classified as social welfare organizations.

Just do away with it completely for all political groups. Then political trolls hiding behind the guise of "social welfare" won't be able to hide behind the IRS' dress while doing their trolling.

That's not an assault on free speech, it's forcing these "social welfare" groups to classify their "free speech" as what it is, which is basically political intervention. Remove that variable from the equation completely and no one will be able to say one group got special treatment while the other is "muzzled" by the IRS. Problem solved!

The post The House Ways and Means Committee Is Still Mad at the IRS appeared first on Going Concern.

Well, Senator Orrin Hatch of Utah heard, and he felt this way about it:

"It’s hard to think of a group of people less deserving of bonuses than IRS employees."

In honor of that comment, we would like to humbly suggest a short list of people less deserving of bonuses than IRS employees. As always, feel free to add yours in the comments.

• U.S. Senators
• Heck, let's throw in all of Congress
• Scott London
• Fred Goodwin
• Joe Namath and his stupid fur coat
• Jamie Dimon
• Peyton Manning
• Everyone involved in the making of Gigli
• People who don't use their turn signals
• People who regularly use words like "dynamic" and "synergy"

Have any to add? Surely there are plenty more.

The post Here Is a Short List of People Less Deserving of Bonuses Than IRS Employees appeared first on Going Concern.

Squarely within the seamy underbelly of Jackson, Michigan stood Potter’s Pub, a “gentlemen’s club.” Potter’s derived its business entirely from cash transactions – food and drink purchases, cover charges, juke box and pool table receipts, and moneys paid to the pub by its stable of dancers for the privilege of grinding out three-minute sets to “Pour Some Sugar On Me” on company-owned poles.

And business was good. So good, in fact, that the sole owner and president of Potter’s was thinking of selling out and moving on. Unfortunately, his first set of prospective buyers also happened to be IRS special agents who had caught wind of some doings’ a-transpirin’ at Potter’s, and set up an undercover sting to get a closer look. Here is an artist’s rendition of the high-tech surveillance equipment employed by the IRS* in its operation:

While meeting with the undercover agents, the president of Potter’s explained that the business was much more profitable that it appeared, and that he only deposited enough in the corporate bank account to cover expenses. The rest, he detailed, was sent to a personal bank account in Florida in denominations less than $10,000, done specifically to avoid required bank reporting that would alert the IRS. Just in case his verbal testimony failed to adequately sway his prospective buyers, the hopeful seller went on to produce a second set of books that reflected the true income of his enterprise.

Needless to say, things did not end well for the president of Potter’s Pub. The IRS searched the establishment, seizing the clandestine ledger as well as $200,000 in what I can only presume was crumpled up singles.

To his credit, after the search the president of Potter’s filed amended tax returns for 2003, 2004 and 2005. Unsympathetic to this conciliatory act, however, the IRS pursued prosecution, and in 2009 the taxpayer was charged – and pled guilty – to filing false tax returns. He was sentenced to 18 months in prison and ordered to pay restitution of $400,000.

Once free from prison, the proprietor of Potter’s Pub’s troubles were far from over. There was still the little matter of his tax liability for the tax years 2002-2005; specifically, the imposition of nearly $250,000 in fraud penalties under Section 6663. It was this fraud penalty that landed the taxpayer in front of the Tax Court.

Section 6663
If any part of any underpayment of tax due on a return is due to fraud, Section 6663 imposes a penalty of 75% of the portion of the underpayment due to the fraud. The burden falls on the IRS to prove fraud, and this evidence must be clear and convincing. If the IRS can prove that any portion of a taxpayer’s underpayment was due to fraud, the burden then shifts to the taxpayer to prove that the entire underpayment was not attributable to the fraud. This much is well established. What is less clear in the tax law, however, is the answer to the question, what constitutes fraud?

The courts have defined fraud as the “intentional wrongdoing designed to evade tax believed to be owing.” That’s lovely, but not particularly helpful. Fortunately, in Spies v. U.S., 317 U.S. 492 (1943), the Supreme Court established eleven “badges of fraud” that indicate fraudulent intent:

1. Understating income;
2. Maintaining inadequate records;
3. Giving implausible or inconsistent explanations of behavior;
4. Concealing income or assets;
5. Failing to cooperate with tax authorities;
6. Engaging in illegal activities;
7. Providing incomplete or misleading information to one’s tax preparer;
8. Lack of credibility of the taxpayer’s testimony;
9. Filing false documents, including false income tax returns;
10. Failing to file tax returns; and
11. Dealing in cash.

After a thorough review, the Tax Court concluded that the badges of fraud overwhelmingly demonstrated that the taxpayer acted with fraudulent intent for each year at issue. The owner of Potter’s Pub substantially underreported both his corporate and personal income over a period of years (1), maintained two sets of books (2), concealed income by skimming from Potter’s Pub (4), hid his secret ledgers from his accountant (7), filed false tax returns (9), and as is a hallmark of the strip club industry, dealt only in cash (11).

In his defense, the taxpayer argued that he lacked fraudulent intent because he was, well…stupid, and didn’t know any better. The Tax Court disagreed, rightly citing the sophistication necessary to conceal more than $2 million in gross receipts and to evade bank reporting requirements while skimming cash.

And thus ends the Ballad of the President of Potter’s Pub.

Tony Nitti is a tax partner at WithumSmith+Brown in Aspen, CO. When he isn’t writing or teaching about tax policy, you can find him skiing, mountain biking, or driving around in a van with his dog, solving mysteries. Find Tony on Twitter at @nittiaj

The post What Happens When You Mix a Seedy Strip Club, an Unsophisticated Taxpayer and the Tax Court? appeared first on Going Concern.